Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Beards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2020 | 01:10 PM
  #41  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,137
Likes: 798
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Tell me, how many HR cases arise each year at any airline over hairstyle?
I know of one recent mohawk debacle. At a legacy.
Reply
Old 10-02-2020 | 02:20 PM
  #42  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,253
Likes: 257
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I know of one recent mohawk debacle. At a legacy.
was the problem tonsorial? Or cultural appropriation?


Reply
Old 10-02-2020 | 06:25 PM
  #43  
OldSF3Dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: O-2 pilot
Default

RAF pilots had beards.
Attached Images
Reply
Old 10-02-2020 | 06:38 PM
  #44  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio
Yeah that was the old way of thinking but has since been disproved. Carriers all over the world allow modest beards.
I have always heard if it is fully inside the inside of the sealing surfaces, it is okay. If it interferes with the sealing surfaces in a substantial way (big bushy beard) then that should not be allowed.
Reply
Old 10-02-2020 | 07:44 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Default

Of all the things to fuss about right now...
Reply
Old 10-02-2020 | 08:16 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 129
Default

Over pressure fed oxygen masks work fine with beards.

this will eventually be changed by a lawsuit of some sort one day
Reply
Old 10-03-2020 | 04:37 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,177
Likes: 159
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast
Of all the things to fuss about right now...
I dont think anyone is fussing about it, but it is a fun distraction right now and something that none of us are passionate about either way. Just a fun conversation, which honestly is exactly what we all need right now. If we can just keep Thekooj out of the conversation it will be a complete success.
Reply
Old 10-03-2020 | 07:01 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Default

If you want beards. Outline specifics n wait for the airline to need something. Stick in the TA , just like the politician.
Reply
Old 10-03-2020 | 07:11 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flippedr6
ExpressJet was about to make the change at the beginning of this year right when all this bs happened. They were going to use it as a recruiting tool. But we know the end to that story.
They were clearly in trouble then if they needed to use that as a recruiting tool.
Reply
Old 10-03-2020 | 08:07 AM
  #50  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,137
Likes: 798
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
Over pressure fed oxygen masks work fine with beards.
Actually the mil analyzed that because of all the SOF guys who need facial hair to blend in at various foriegn locations.

They found that oxygen saturated beads are EXTREMELY flammable (explosive actually), and will pretty much burn your face right off. But that's OK for SOF, because they use O2 during insertion/extraction transport, not when they're actually in combat. If there's a fire on an aircraft the crew, not the pax, will fight it.

You can accept the risk that an O2-saturated beard could be a problem during fire-fighting (we don't do that very often) but you can't pretend it's not a risk.


Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
this will eventually be changed by a lawsuit of some sort one day
Not a chance. It's already very well-established law that employers can set grooming standards... future lawsuits would only trigger the existing precedent (and waste money). The only thing you *might* see is legislation (which WOULD over-turn established legal precedent) preventing employers from banning some traditionally ethnic or religious grooming fashions (ex, dreads, cornrows). That's already happening in some places.

But unless some legislation just straight up bans ALL employer-defined grooming standards, or specifically authorizes beards for white guys, it won't help most pilots.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices