Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
The problem with inexperienced, young pilots >

The problem with inexperienced, young pilots

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The problem with inexperienced, young pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2007, 01:42 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
azvandriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: BE99 Single Pilot
Posts: 115
Default

Airlines like KLM have 500 hour FOs flying in 747s. So why won't it work for Mesa and others like that?
[/QUOTE]


KLM was also responsible for the deadliest airline crash ever.
azvandriver is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 02:00 PM
  #32  
New boss = Old boss
Thread Starter
 
mike734's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Ca B737
Posts: 2,762
Default

Originally Posted by azvandriver View Post
KLM was also responsible for the deadliest airline crash ever.
The KLM captain, (who was the KLM poster boy) was responsible for the accident. Also remember the PanAm crew missed an intersection and should not have been on the runway. (Perfectly understandable under the circumstances.)

A more experienced FO may have spoken up and prevented the accident. I don't know how experienced he was but I think he was fairly junior.
mike734 is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 02:21 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: L Side
Posts: 409
Default

I hate biting on these threads but my sense of reason can only bare so much. For those of us who think, we may be aware of what are known to as Logical Fallacies. This topic of low-timers being responsible for a disproportionate number of accidents and incidents brings a few to mind:

Contrary To Fact Hypothesis
Common Belief
Appeal To Ignorance
False Anology
Hasty Generalization

If you are not familiar, get on your fave search engine and do a search.

Only a certified (insert choiceof words here) could ever try to place the blame for the KLM/Pan Am disaster on the low experience of the crew. For the person who made that claim, please research and post the flight times for each and every crew-member involved in that accident.
dundem is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 03:21 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Flight Instructor
Posts: 623
Default

Originally Posted by mike734 View Post
In theory you can crew an aircraft with an experienced Captain and a very new FO. It was done that way for years. Sure there were plenty of accidents but todays aircraft and flying environment are much safer. Airlines like KLM have 500 hour FOs flying in 747s. So why won't it work for Mesa and others like that?

The answer is longevity. Since Meas and those types are not career airlines the FOs will be "trained" by relatively low time Captains. Senior captains will move on rapidly and create upgrade opportunities too soon for fresh FOs. Also, since the upgrade time is minimal the FOs will not get enough experience in the right seat to be good mentors for new hire FOs that replace them. The cycle will continue until there are a series of tragic accidents cause by crew error by young inexperienced, (ambitious) crews.

I think guys like JO have not thought this through. They believe there is a never ending supply of 500 hour wonders willing to work for peanuts until they can upgrade. I don't believe this will continue in the near future. Majors will be in a better position to hire very young FOs because of the lengthy upgrade time. Mesas and the smaller airlines like them will be forced to raise pay and working conditions to retain good mentors or be faced with dangerous crews.

I'm just thinking out loud. That's what occurred to me today.
You say Regionals are NOT career airlines? Iknow plenty of Captains that have been with Regionals for 20 years
N6724G is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 03:59 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
btwissel's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Q400 survivor
Posts: 537
Default

and there are people that spend 20yrs working at burger king. not a preferable way to live, but if your situation requires it, i can be done
btwissel is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 06:42 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,807
Default

Originally Posted by btwissel View Post
and there are people that spend 20yrs working at burger king. not a preferable way to live, but if your situation requires it, i can be done
Ouch...I hope you didn't just compare the Regionals with Burger King!!
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 06:51 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dashdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 433
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB View Post
Ouch...I hope you didn't just compare the Regionals with Burger King!!
Alright, I'll say it before someone else does:

Your right, Burger King pays way better!
Dashdog is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 07:06 PM
  #38  
La Familia Delta
 
ghilis101's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 2,467
Default

come on, who aspries to be an RJ captain for the rest of their life. thats downright ridiculous. its a stepping stone. people who stay there may have a good reason, but dont justify it by saying thats where you wanted to be. right, ever since you were a little kid you dreamt of flying 6 legs a day to farm towns and getting harrassed whenever you couldnt turn the airplane in 27 minutes.
ghilis101 is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 08:30 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
azvandriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: BE99 Single Pilot
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by dundem View Post
I hate biting on these threads but my sense of reason can only bare so much. For those of us who think, we may be aware of what are known to as Logical Fallacies. This topic of low-timers being responsible for a disproportionate number of accidents and incidents brings a few to mind:

Contrary To Fact Hypothesis
Common Belief
Appeal To Ignorance
False Anology
Hasty Generalization

If you are not familiar, get on your fave search engine and do a search.

Only a certified (insert choiceof words here) could ever try to place the blame for the KLM/Pan Am disaster on the low experience of the crew. For the person who made that claim, please research and post the flight times for each and every crew-member involved in that accident.
Well I got you to bite. I didn't say the low experience of the crew was to blame. I just said KLM caused the worst airline disaster in history and you took the bait.

I really don't care how much time people get hired with. I just prefer that he or she can fly well.
azvandriver is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 09:14 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

"Well I got you to bite. I didn't say the low experience of the crew was to blame."

Do you get a medal for that? Is it good entertainment posting at this site simply to get a reaction out of someone else?

You don't score points at this site, or in the career, for "I got you to bite".

Just letting you know for future reference.
de727ups is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nw320driver
Foreign
35
10-15-2010 07:41 PM
aerospacepilot
Regional
59
07-01-2007 04:57 PM
Was That For Us?
Major
22
06-03-2007 07:53 AM
rjlavender
Major
26
10-19-2006 08:48 PM
RockBottom
Major
40
01-03-2006 05:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices