Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

LA base?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2021, 05:01 PM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
jayhook's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 12
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Engine-under wing time. Definitely.
When comparing TPIC does engine under wing really make a difference? I haven’t flown both but I imagine the general complexity and handling between a crj/e140,5 can’t be all too different than an e170,5 (other than a marginally wider thrust centerline). The job of regional pilot is certainly the same.
jayhook is offline  
Old 01-24-2021, 05:51 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

^^^ Matters not, but there are advantages to getting experience in next generation aircraft. Nothing wrong with the CRJ, but its very old technology. No VNAV, No Autothrottle, No CAT3 and no RNP-AR.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 01-24-2021, 06:20 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,121
Default

Originally Posted by PerfInit View Post
^^^ Matters not, but there are advantages to getting experience in next generation aircraft. Nothing wrong with the CRJ, but its very old technology. No VNAV, No Autothrottle, No CAT3 and no RNP-AR.
No auto brakes on the CRJ as well. Flown both equipment, I thought it was an upgrade having FADEC with the CRJ700/900 compared to the 200 which feels and flies like a massive Piper Archer. CRJ requires substantially more workload for the pilots IMO. You’re more of a manager on the ERJ175, confirming VNAV and auto throttles are behaving. That has it’s downfalls as you lose your hand flying skills.

I would much rather be in a 175 out of the left seat, my first couple of simulator lessons in the 175 had me smiling ear to ear, it’s a sweet jet, can’t believe I didn’t fly it sooner. VNAV took some time for me, which is common with our CRJ men and women transitioning to the 175 at OO. It’s my belief majors would consider that time more valuable due to VNAV experience, which naturally would result in lower training costs for any new hire.

Last edited by LAXtoDEN; 01-24-2021 at 06:37 PM.
LAXtoDEN is offline  
Old 01-24-2021, 06:43 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 120
Default

Originally Posted by ezydriver View Post
For regionals with a base in LAX.
Is LA a city that a lot of pilots ask for as base?
I live in LA and my wife is too tough to leave town.
Unless you want to try and survive on regional pay or big three come calling, LA is mostly a Pt135 gig area if you want to make money. You really have to get out of LA to have more airline options if you don’t want to commute.
Minepza is offline  
Old 01-24-2021, 08:02 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by jayhook View Post
When comparing TPIC does engine under wing really make a difference? .
No....it’s a joke. It’s something that is said to make fun of people for thinking the plane matters. The company issuing the check is what matters. Period.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Old 01-24-2021, 09:48 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,121
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7 View Post
No....it’s a joke. It’s something that is said to make fun of people for thinking the plane matters. The company issuing the check is what matters. Period.
I’d say adding any new type rating places a prettier picture on the resume. Before COVID sucker punched the whole industry we had pilots going right seat regional to right seat ULCC to right seat Legacy.
LAXtoDEN is offline  
Old 01-24-2021, 10:09 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 203
Default

Originally Posted by LAXtoDEN View Post
No auto brakes on the CRJ as well. Flown both equipment, I thought it was an upgrade having FADEC with the CRJ700/900 compared to the 200 which feels and flies like a massive Piper Archer. CRJ requires substantially more workload for the pilots IMO. You’re more of a manager on the ERJ175, confirming VNAV and auto throttles are behaving. That has it’s downfalls as you lose your hand flying skills.

I would much rather be in a 175 out of the left seat, my first couple of simulator lessons in the 175 had me smiling ear to ear, it’s a sweet jet, can’t believe I didn’t fly it sooner. VNAV took some time for me, which is common with our CRJ men and women transitioning to the 175 at OO. It’s my belief majors would consider that time more valuable due to VNAV experience, which naturally would result in lower training costs for any new hire.
please tell me you’re joking because that comment just made me dumber.
LAX2MSP is offline  
Old 01-24-2021, 10:17 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,121
Default

Originally Posted by LAX2MSP View Post
please tell me you’re joking because that comment just made me dumber.
Which part I went on sort of a ramble, also have you flown both?

Last edited by LAXtoDEN; 01-24-2021 at 10:37 PM.
LAXtoDEN is offline  
Old 01-25-2021, 02:45 AM
  #19  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by LAXtoDEN View Post
Which part I went on sort of a ramble, also have you flown both?
To be clear the CRJ 900 does in fact have VNAV.

Best advice I ever got when choosing a regional was to ignore plane envy. Whatever you do, do not choose a regional based off the fleet. I’d say the only exception in today’s environment is to maybe veer away away from 50 seat only regionals. At the end of the day TPIC is TPIC. Choose a regional because of their ability to withstand times like these, plus having a base that you won’t need to commute to. It makes all the difference. Besides we know the chicks dig CRJ pilots
citabriacaptain is offline  
Old 01-25-2021, 04:42 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by LAXtoDEN View Post
I’d say adding any new type rating places a prettier picture on the resume. Before COVID sucker punched the whole industry we had pilots going right seat regional to right seat ULCC to right seat Legacy.
Sure....every type you can add is another point in the system....but people who talk about “under-wing engine time” are usually making fun of people. If you don’t realize that....you are the one being made fun of. Just sayin.

As to your comments about right seat to right seat......I can’t actually agree with you that when that happens it has ANYTHING to do with complexity or modernity of aircraft flown. That’s usually a function of HR and/or how much hustle that individual put forth.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
verticalspeed
Part 135
5669
03-25-2024 04:02 PM
mike734
Horizon Air
4027
01-30-2023 06:00 PM
Around123
Regional
73
01-09-2014 09:37 AM
flyingfarmer
United
31
03-01-2012 05:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices