Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Mesa's finally going at it. >

Mesa's finally going at it.

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mesa's finally going at it.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2007 | 12:30 PM
  #21  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 127
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
To say that a company's stock movement does not reflect its health is false. It may not be a mirror image of its movement but as a general rule it usually shows trends.
Might want to take a look at the stagnant stock price of UPS over the last two years and compare it with UPS' financial strength and credit rating...
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 12:44 PM
  #22  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

True but it's not always about that. Many people forget that you aren't just buying and selling a fluctuating number. You are actually buying ownership of the company. The current stock price is what people are willing to buy the company for. The lack of fluctuation means that many people are buying and selling at the same time keeping the supply/demand even. Once the IPO is out the company got the money it needed to expand. The rest is just what Joe #1 is willing to sell his piece of the company to Joe #2 for.

In the case of XJT. They reported a loss. People don't think their part of the company is worth as much so they are trying to off load it. Should they start posting profits people will hold on to their part of the company driving their shares up. I think the company does good business and should we see several 170/190s come rolling out I think they'll do great business. So my buying them at $5.75 is good to me. Should they tank then they tank and I'm out what I was willing to lose.

Knowing an airline is no different than knowing burger king or anything else. We have a famous CEO that drives that home. It's just about numbers, management, and potential numbers. Like was mentioned, look at Berkshire Hathaway. The guy doesn't know anything about most the companies he owns. Just looked at the numbers. MSNBC had a great show on him last week.

Anyway the XJT stock is sinking because of a shady future, reported losses, ect. Not because of the people that work there which is a big problem. People think because you say something like "XJT isn't doing so well" that you're calling the pilots idiots or something.

Mesa is always amazing me. This china bit is going to be funny. The chinese mentality will work hand in hand with them. Regardless of what they do I don't see it lasting for very long and that 737 bit is BS. All china wants is it's own airlines using it's own motherland airplanes flown by their own pilots. They'll probably treat you like a scab the whole time you're there.
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 01:15 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
I did. But there's nothing wrong with being a CFI and that was harder to accomplish.
Are you sure? Didn't you have to get re-checked? At least you said something to that effect.
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 01:26 PM
  #24  
daytonaflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Jump
Default

In my opinion, the only reason ExpressJet is surviving right now is because the industry is booming. People are flying a lot right now and the load factors are relatively high.
Almost every airline is doing well, not great, but well. Even Independence Air would have been okay if they were still alive right now.
Once the flying slows, which it eventually will, the pains of running an semi-autonomous airline with regional jets will hit hard.
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 01:41 PM
  #25  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Might want to take a look at the stagnant stock price of UPS over the last two years and compare it with UPS' financial strength and credit rating...
Without even looking deeply into the financials of UPS I would say its easy to see that they haven't undergone any new major expansion or operations rebuidling. Unless a blue chip company screws up, gets involved in a scandal or otherwise shows major promise for increased market share then their stock will likely move slowly.

UPS net income increased 10% last year and 15% the year before that. That is definitely healthy, but I wouldn't call it strong growth given the nature of their sector

Fedex for example had 28% increase in net income last year and 68% the year before that.
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 01:54 PM
  #26  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
Are you sure? Didn't you have to get re-checked? At least you said something to that effect.
I had to get a re-check yes. I didn't have much experience using the FMS and autopilot. He wanted to see me do things using the system that I wasn't familiar with ie. getting the FMS and autopilot to fly the hold instead of me hand flying all of it. So spent a lesson on it then went back and nailed it. Wasn't a big deal. Getting your CFI is definitely harder.
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 01:55 PM
  #27  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
Without even looking deeply into the financials of UPS I would say its easy to see that they haven't undergone any new major expansion or operations rebuidling. Unless a blue chip company screws up, gets involved in a scandal or otherwise shows major promise for increased market share then their stock will likely move slowly.

UPS net income increased 10% last year and 15% the year before that. That is definitely healthy, but I wouldn't call it strong growth given the nature of their sector

Fedex for example had 28% increase in net income last year and 68% the year before that.
They are trying with the ANQ base. UPS is healthy. The shareholders are still making money.
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 06:23 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
I did. But there's nothing wrong with being a CFI and that was harder to accomplish.
Wow, that must have been darn near impossible then.
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 06:28 PM
  #29  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by POPA
Wow, that must have been darn near impossible then.
Just had a bad day. Wasn't feelin it. The Ft. Worth FSDO has an 80% fail. much harder. The checkride for 121, at least here, was easy enough. Nothing really serious. Just was "off" on my first one and didn't have the FMS down.
Reply
Old 06-15-2007 | 07:55 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

For the folks that think they understand stock prices, you should really read "The Little Book that Beats the Market". Pretty interest stuff.

There is no rhyme or reason why stock prices fluctuate so much in 99.9% of the companies out there. Buying stock is legalized gambling, the ONLY thing holding up the house of cards is that others are willing to go along with the idea. You're not buying a piece of the company, you're buying a piece of paper, and that's generally not even the case anymore. You can't go to the company that you just bought a share from and trade in your stock for money, and you certainly don't get an equal share of their profits at the end of the day (and don't point out dividends, paying $80/share for some oil stock and getting $0.50 in dividends from it is hardly cost effective)...

People that play the stock market are betting on appreciation, just like home owners do. But at least homes on tangible.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
5
10-10-2007 08:46 AM
flyerfly
Regional
10
04-12-2007 09:33 AM
trevtt600
Regional
5
02-23-2007 05:18 PM
UConnQB14
Hangar Talk
5
03-26-2006 03:28 PM
loudgarrettdriver
Corporate
7
02-15-2006 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices