Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Mesa's finally going at it. >

Mesa's finally going at it.

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mesa's finally going at it.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2007 | 08:15 PM
  #31  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fosters
You can't go to the company that you just bought a share from and trade in your stock for money, and you certainly don't get an equal share of their profits at the end of the day (and don't point out dividends, paying $80/share for some oil stock and getting $0.50 in dividends from it is hardly cost effective
That's where your P/E ratio comes in. The amount of money you are willing to invest to get $1 of profit. Yes you are absolutely buying a piece of the company and yes you get a piece of the profit but only your share of it. If a company has millions and millions of shares you won't get much. You can play it as a gamble or can decide to purchase and sit on it for the rest of time and just collect the profits. They are there just smaller. I paid for college off Boeing and Wal-Mart. Should Boeing get the 767 tanker bit with the Airforce I might just be able to retire a little early I only own three stocks though. Boeing, Wal-mart, and XJT(just 200shares). The real money is in ETFs. I've pulled 19% this year on EWA and EWJ. Highly recommended and www.morningstar.com should you want a great research source.
Reply
Old 06-17-2007 | 10:49 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
That's where your P/E ratio comes in. The amount of money you are willing to invest to get $1 of profit. Yes you are absolutely buying a piece of the company and yes you get a piece of the profit but only your share of it.
I don't follow you. The only time you get a share of the profits from the share of stock you own is when the company pays dividends (which I pointed out in a previous post).

I own stock to and I have never, ever, received a check at the end of the year for profits unless it was dividends.

Sometimes shares will split, but then you just own more stock, which you could sell to another investor...who buys them...hoping they go up, not because he gets paid money to own them (unless, as I said, they pay dividends).

The only thing holding up the house of cards is that other people are willing to pay for this "paper" that really isn't worth anything unless it pays dividends.
Reply
Old 06-18-2007 | 06:38 AM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

Some stocks increase in value but pay little or no dividents.
Reply
Old 06-18-2007 | 07:39 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sgrd0q
Some stocks increase in value but pay little or no dividents.
Exactly...and my point, which I previously stated, is that the only thing holding up the house of cards is that others are willing to buy them. What makes a stock go up in value? Is it because the underlying business is making more money? No...because the business doesn't share that income with the stockholders (unless it pays dividends). The ONLY REASON stocks go up is because others are willing to buy them...for the ONLY REASON hoping they go up in value. Why do they go up in value...because others are buying them! See my point? It's a never ending cycle. Essentially, the stock market is the biggest MLM scheme there is.

A house of cards my friend, a house of cards.
Reply
Old 06-18-2007 | 01:50 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

That's true for any market. Take the housing market – why is a two bedroom apartment on Park Avenue in Manhattan worth 10 times more than a similar sized apartment somewhere in the middle of nowhere?
Reply
Old 06-18-2007 | 01:57 PM
  #36  
SharkAir's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sgrd0q
That's true for any market. Take the housing market – why is a two bedroom apartment on Park Avenue in Manhattan worth 10 times more than a similar sized apartment somewhere in the middle of nowhere?
You're joking, right?
Reply
Old 06-18-2007 | 02:23 PM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

No, I am not joking. Actualy 15 Central Park West seems to be the most expensive apartment building:

http://www.halstead.com/resources_pr...l.aspx?id=1027
Reply
Old 06-18-2007 | 02:58 PM
  #38  
SharkAir's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Default

The demand is higher for Central Park, so it costs more. The demand for Curtis, Nebraska (or wherever nowhere is for you) tends to be a little less so it's cheaper. Living in Manhattan is a sort of privilege; you get access to high paying jobs, stuff to do, and so on. With Nebraska, just lots of corn.
Reply
Old 06-20-2007 | 05:27 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Default

easy toiletduck.... sorry i was still a little ****ed about how you were bashing alpa in another thread when your still wet behind the ears. you have no life experience with the issues you were so openly bashing. it amazes me about some people in this industry that want to be mr know it all's. dude you have a lot to learn and a horrible attitude

stock prices are not a reliable way to predict a good company vs a bad. earnings forecasts can be extremely misleading and wrong. if the company doesn't come up with the numbers that these forecasters are guessing then the stock plunges..... did the company change somehow? no but the public is less likely to back them. also part of the reason many companies stopped giving out information about progress and financial status prior to their #'s release. or how about this scenario that tv show MAd Money doesn't like a stock so they honk some horns and scream "sell sell sell". what happens? the stock drops. why? one person didn't like the stock. sometimes in a stable industry it might be a good indicator of a strong company but it has very little to do with the company. all about how much people are willing to believe in a certain company. people are fickle ... no rhyme or reason

sorry for any grammatical errors champ. sorry for the attack but being young, ignorant, and outspoken ****es me off.
Reply
Old 06-20-2007 | 07:00 AM
  #40  
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by 4N1flyr
Anybody know what "Kun Peng" stands for?

(Ready, set... go)
Junior Assignment
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
5
10-10-2007 08:46 AM
flyerfly
Regional
10
04-12-2007 09:33 AM
trevtt600
Regional
5
02-23-2007 05:18 PM
UConnQB14
Hangar Talk
5
03-26-2006 03:28 PM
loudgarrettdriver
Corporate
7
02-15-2006 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices