Mesa's finally going at it.
#31
You can't go to the company that you just bought a share from and trade in your stock for money, and you certainly don't get an equal share of their profits at the end of the day (and don't point out dividends, paying $80/share for some oil stock and getting $0.50 in dividends from it is hardly cost effective
I only own three stocks though. Boeing, Wal-mart, and XJT(just 200shares). The real money is in ETFs. I've pulled 19% this year on EWA and EWJ. Highly recommended and www.morningstar.com should you want a great research source.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
I own stock to and I have never, ever, received a check at the end of the year for profits unless it was dividends.
Sometimes shares will split, but then you just own more stock, which you could sell to another investor...who buys them...hoping they go up, not because he gets paid money to own them (unless, as I said, they pay dividends).
The only thing holding up the house of cards is that other people are willing to pay for this "paper" that really isn't worth anything unless it pays dividends.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Exactly...and my point, which I previously stated, is that the only thing holding up the house of cards is that others are willing to buy them. What makes a stock go up in value? Is it because the underlying business is making more money? No...because the business doesn't share that income with the stockholders (unless it pays dividends). The ONLY REASON stocks go up is because others are willing to buy them...for the ONLY REASON hoping they go up in value. Why do they go up in value...because others are buying them! See my point? It's a never ending cycle. Essentially, the stock market is the biggest MLM scheme there is.
A house of cards my friend, a house of cards.
A house of cards my friend, a house of cards.
#36
#37
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
No, I am not joking. Actualy 15 Central Park West seems to be the most expensive apartment building:
http://www.halstead.com/resources_pr...l.aspx?id=1027
http://www.halstead.com/resources_pr...l.aspx?id=1027
#38
The demand is higher for Central Park, so it costs more. The demand for Curtis, Nebraska (or wherever nowhere is for you) tends to be a little less so it's cheaper. Living in Manhattan is a sort of privilege; you get access to high paying jobs, stuff to do, and so on. With Nebraska, just lots of corn.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
easy toiletduck.... sorry i was still a little ****ed about how you were bashing alpa in another thread when your still wet behind the ears. you have no life experience with the issues you were so openly bashing. it amazes me about some people in this industry that want to be mr know it all's. dude you have a lot to learn and a horrible attitude
stock prices are not a reliable way to predict a good company vs a bad. earnings forecasts can be extremely misleading and wrong. if the company doesn't come up with the numbers that these forecasters are guessing then the stock plunges..... did the company change somehow? no but the public is less likely to back them. also part of the reason many companies stopped giving out information about progress and financial status prior to their #'s release. or how about this scenario that tv show MAd Money doesn't like a stock so they honk some horns and scream "sell sell sell". what happens? the stock drops. why? one person didn't like the stock. sometimes in a stable industry it might be a good indicator of a strong company but it has very little to do with the company. all about how much people are willing to believe in a certain company. people are fickle ... no rhyme or reason
sorry for any grammatical errors champ. sorry for the attack but being young, ignorant, and outspoken ****es me off.
stock prices are not a reliable way to predict a good company vs a bad. earnings forecasts can be extremely misleading and wrong. if the company doesn't come up with the numbers that these forecasters are guessing then the stock plunges..... did the company change somehow? no but the public is less likely to back them. also part of the reason many companies stopped giving out information about progress and financial status prior to their #'s release. or how about this scenario that tv show MAd Money doesn't like a stock so they honk some horns and scream "sell sell sell". what happens? the stock drops. why? one person didn't like the stock. sometimes in a stable industry it might be a good indicator of a strong company but it has very little to do with the company. all about how much people are willing to believe in a certain company. people are fickle ... no rhyme or reason
sorry for any grammatical errors champ. sorry for the attack but being young, ignorant, and outspoken ****es me off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



