![]() |
Originally Posted by TyWebb
(Post 3383737)
We could have made the same argument for COVID and yet it worked out the opposite. Also, covid exacerbated the population shift and now airlines can't stop service from the traditional smaller markets.
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3383721)
How will those things buy time for inefficient regional fleets? Wouldn’t those issues hit smaller markets equally hard, lower demand, and make the decision to park planes already facing retirement that much easier? If a major recession and high fuel prices are on the way, wouldn’t the legacy carriers use their near term deliveries to focus on improving efficiency by replacing older jets, drop low yielding markets, and then use future deliveries for growth when demand returns? Economic forces will definitely affect hiring at all levels, but expensive fuel and lowered passenger demand due to less discretionary income won’t do the regionals any favors. It won’t be good for anyone.
It’ll be interesting to see if the regional airlines will have enough foresight to continue hiring through the next downturn to prevent being so short staffed when hiring picks up again Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
If you were debating between a career in this industry or an IT career, you future looks much brighter hanging with the Big Bang types.
|
Originally Posted by golfandflows
(Post 3383416)
The coming recession/depression is about to buy the regionals a few more years.
Inflation Oil price Russia FED interest rate policy mismanagement The hit on American’s discretionary income is about to bring all of the fun to a screeching halt. But as the COVID situation has proven, the opposite can and will happen of what every “expert” prediction may be. Time shall tell, and it appears we don’t have long to wait to find out. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3383750)
Our ATC system is pretty saturated and the only way to handle that growth is with larger aircraft. Considering that the regionals have all of the 70/76 seat aircraft that they are allowed, coupled with the age, unpopularity, and inefficiency of the 50 seaters, .
|
Originally Posted by skblu
(Post 3384166)
Where do you have evidence of that? I’ve heard of plenty of airports having gate space and operational limitations but never “ATC saturation” being a thing.
|
Originally Posted by skblu
(Post 3384166)
Where do you have evidence of that? I’ve heard of plenty of airports having gate space and operational limitations but never “ATC saturation” being a thing.
|
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3384456)
ATC satiation mainly a northeast/SFO problem. That only way for growth To happen at these airports are larger aircraft.
|
Originally Posted by golfandflows
(Post 3384457)
We need to pay our teachers more.
|
Originally Posted by golfandflows
(Post 3384457)
We need to pay our teachers more.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands