![]() |
I bet some airline hedge fuel a few months ago its just a matter of how much they did hedge could save a few airlines for a while.
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3383721)
How will those things buy time for inefficient regional fleets? Wouldn’t those issues hit smaller markets equally hard, lower demand, and make the decision to park planes already facing retirement that much easier? If a major recession and high fuel prices are on the way, wouldn’t the legacy carriers use their near term deliveries to focus on improving efficiency by replacing older jets, drop low yielding markets, and then use future deliveries for growth when demand returns? Economic forces will definitely affect hiring at all levels, but expensive fuel and lowered passenger demand due to less discretionary income won’t do the regionals any favors. It won’t be good for anyone.
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3383750)
UAL alone has dropped around 20 small markets. If the legacy, LCC’s, and freight companies significantly reduce hiring, that would buy time more than anything. Fuel prices went way down during the pandemic also. Prior to the pandemic air travel was predicted to significantly grow. Our ATC system is pretty saturated and the only way to handle that growth is with larger aircraft. Considering that the regionals have all of the 70/76 seat aircraft that they are allowed, coupled with the age, unpopularity, and inefficiency of the 50 seaters, that growth will occur at the legacy level. Unless a viable 50 seat aircraft hits the market quickly, the regional fleets are going to significantly shrink over the next few years. Higher fuel prices will accelerate that. A full blown recession could slow everything down as well.
Originally Posted by skblu
(Post 3384166)
Where do you have evidence of that? I’ve heard of plenty of airports having gate space and operational limitations but never “ATC saturation” being a thing.
|
Originally Posted by threeighteen
(Post 3384744)
The 50 seaters will get parked fast. Not all of them, but many will go. The ones remaining will be on government subsidized routes. The 65-76 seaters will be getting run ragged through tough times though. Cheap staffing at the regionals and slowed hiring at majors will benefit regionals during this time. Majors will likely park the older portions of their narrowbody fleets (UA's airbus fleet, 752 fleet, etc)
50 seaters will return full force in the form of ultra efficient turboprops like the new Embraer that launches this decade. The 145/200 will last until then. And as major hiring comes screeching to a halt here in the next few months with WW3 oil prices, the regionals will be able to catch up on staffing. A lot of those small markets were only dropped for staffing issues, and they will return as staffing at the regionals catches up. From everything that I’ve read about the Embraer turboprop is that they’re talking about something in the 70-90 seat capacity range and that will be problematic in the US market due to scope. Also, they are only considering the possibility of a 50 seat version at this point. I don’t see airlines parking 175’s to buy a turboprop. I also don’t see the 145/200’s lasting that long, especially if fuel prices stay up for longer than we would like. |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3383750)
UAL alone has dropped around 20 small markets. If the legacy, LCC’s, and freight companies significantly reduce hiring, that would buy time more than anything. Fuel prices went way down during the pandemic also. Prior to the pandemic air travel was predicted to significantly grow. Our ATC system is pretty saturated and the only way to handle that growth is with larger aircraft. Considering that the regionals have all of the 70/76 seat aircraft that they are allowed, coupled with the age, unpopularity, and inefficiency of the 50 seaters, that growth will occur at the legacy level. Unless a viable 50 seat aircraft hits the market quickly, the regional fleets are going to significantly shrink over the next few years. Higher fuel prices will accelerate that. A full blown recession could slow everything down as well.
|
Originally Posted by TyWebb
(Post 3384991)
Fuel prices being the different variable is a great point, however, do you remember what was flying in the year of 2020? 76 seaters and cargo. A recession of major magnitude will change it all... I don't think we will see anymore bailouts because of 200 brl oil. Not sure if I am backing my own point up here but just seem the green new deal might happen without a vote being cast.
|
I thought WWIII was going to happen if Trump got reelected???
It's a real shame. All of this could have been avoided had people voted correctly. The average American voter deserves what they've got coming. No remorse. Get the popcorn ready, I'm enjoying the show. |
Originally Posted by PatriotFirst
(Post 3385301)
I thought WWIII was going to happen if Trump got reelected???
It's a real shame. All of this could have been avoided had people voted correctly. The average American voter deserves what they've got coming. No remorse. Get the popcorn ready, I'm enjoying the show. $300 crude barrel + huge drop in demand for flying + high cost to fly a jet once fuel hedging is dried up + panic by airlines = furlough town my friends. I’ve seen some market analysts suggest 300 a barrel is on the low side of where things could go. Add a war that the US and UK are forced into via NATO, which again, many are saying is a case of “when” and on “if” …and we got trouble in paradise folks. Hopefully this entire thing is solved with diplomacy but holy smokes, this has the potential to be a killer for aviation in the near term if things don’t become stable soon |
Barring a large drop in flying for whatever cause the regionals are going to shrink....a lot. Senior F/O's are getting interviews with major airlines and they're already short Captains at most regionals. Some numbers I've seen are 9000 pilots being hired by B737/A320 and larger operators in the next 12-18 months. The vast majority of those will come from regional airlines. They are roughly 20,000 Regional Pilots right now. So nearly half the pilots gone in the next 12-18 months.
I think the only way they're going to fix this is putting Regional Pilots on mainline seniority lists so when they flow they'll get paid as though they'd been at mainline all that time. Or something similar, perhaps even merging into mainline which I think is least likely. It'll give the mainline unions some major negotiating power. |
Originally Posted by PorkyMcFuzz
(Post 3385324)
Without getting political about who’s fault things are, it certainly seems like things are on a knife edge right now. If it does get as bad as some are saying it is about to, well, let’s just say I hope you aren’t on the bottom end of a seniority list where ever you may be. The music could stop violently fast for regional and major hiring.
$300 crude barrel + huge drop in demand for flying + high cost to fly a jet once fuel hedging is dried up + panic by airlines = furlough town my friends. I’ve seen some market analysts suggest 300 a barrel is on the low side of where things could go. Add a war that the US and UK are forced into via NATO, which again, many are saying is a case of “when” and on “if” …and we got trouble in paradise folks. Hopefully this entire thing is solved with diplomacy but holy smokes, this has the potential to be a killer for aviation in the near term if things don’t become stable soon |
Originally Posted by cessnaflyr
(Post 3385393)
Man I really hope this stuff gets figured out soon. After Covid throwing us all for a disastrous loop these past few years I was really looking forward to a bit of stability, even just for a few months!! It’s too soon for another downturn. It’s starting to feel like 2008 again.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:34 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands