Regionals getting desperate…
#61
That’s sort of what I said, isn’t it?
For a regional to remain viable they must retain CAs long enough to sit left seat enough for them to get an FO up to 1000 hours SIC. That is the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM assuming no loss of ANY FOs prior to them becoming CAs themselves (which of course there is) and no loss of any CAs prior to them getting 1000 hours of 121 PIC (which of course there is).
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,449
negative
In fact, the loss of ANY FOs prior to becoming a CA is more devastating than the early loss of a CA. A CA that leaves after flying as a CA for 500 hours has ‘cost’ the organization 1000 hrs of SIC time but has ‘earned’ for the organization only 500 hours of SIC time, whereas any senior FO (600-800 hrs SIC) who departs gives an even lower return on ‘investment’ in terms of CA hours. Nor is it just
Losing FOs hasn't been nearly as devastating as losing CAs for the last 12 to 18 months.
In fact, the loss of ANY FOs prior to becoming a CA is more devastating than the early loss of a CA. A CA that leaves after flying as a CA for 500 hours has ‘cost’ the organization 1000 hrs of SIC time but has ‘earned’ for the organization only 500 hours of SIC time, whereas any senior FO (600-800 hrs SIC) who departs gives an even lower return on ‘investment’ in terms of CA hours. Nor is it just
#63
Absolutely. But losing an FO with 1000 hours of SIC time means you just lost 1000 hours of SIC. Losing a CA WITH 1200 hours -1000 of FO and 200 of CA time means you lost 800 hours of SIC time. For the system to maintain steady state the average CA before he/she leaves/quits/retires needs to fly enough to generate the 1000 hours SIC to cover their own upgrade and any additional required to offset FOs leaving with their own SIC time. So yeah, CAs are the most limiting factor, but every FO that leaves with OO derived SIC hours is a cost too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post