Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regionals replacing the Majors or regionals going away? >

Regionals replacing the Majors or regionals going away?

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regionals replacing the Majors or regionals going away?

Old 06-04-2008, 08:02 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 69
Default Regionals replacing the Majors or regionals going away?

Some regionals are making nice profits. Could this mean that regionals could out grow majors. I might have misunderstood the article. Is this good or bad for regionals?
http://www.forbes.com/2008/06/02/avi...regionals.html
tprangner is offline  
Old 06-04-2008, 08:29 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Eagle FO, ERJ
Posts: 85
Default

this writer has very little understanding of the way in which major airlines use regional airlines.
weirdbiz is offline  
Old 06-04-2008, 08:31 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

most regionals get guaranteed profits that's how they make their money. if they gain flying more profits. if they lose flying smaller profits or a loss. the 2 regionals that tried to go it alone lost or are losing big time. aca (independence) and expressjet.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 06-04-2008, 08:45 PM
  #4  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Just wait until the majors start making the regionals pay their own fuel bills. Things could very easily start going back to the way the "feeders" used to do business. XJT already started it back up again with some of the DAL flying out of LAX. Some of that flying is pro-rate and XJT is responsible for fuel and in some cases advertising. If the route isnt profitable neither is xjt, if it is then they both make money. Unlike today where if the planes are empty the regional still makes money as long as they complete the flights.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:05 AM
  #5  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,038
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
Just wait until the majors start making the regionals pay their own fuel bills. Things could very easily start going back to the way the "feeders" used to do business. XJT already started it back up again with some of the DAL flying out of LAX. Some of that flying is pro-rate and XJT is responsible for fuel and in some cases advertising. If the route isnt profitable neither is xjt, if it is then they both make money. Unlike today where if the planes are empty the regional still makes money as long as they complete the flights.
I'm not sure the majors will go that route. If they had to pay for their own fuel, regionals are not going to sign a contract that guarantees financial losses...they will raise their prices to cover fuel. Additionally, based on recent events, they will likely add some extra on top of that to account for unforseen fuel price hikes...sort of like hedging.

This means that majors who force their feeders to pay for fuel will have to pay a premium, putting them at a competetive disadavantage. Other majors might decide to just better manage their fuel price situation (hedging, etc), and take advantage of lower-priced feed.

Regionals are not in the business of participating in the marketplace...they are are very effecient (well in some cases) technical specialists. The general contractor worries about all the subs and the price of materiels. The drywall guy just installs the drywall...he doesn't usually provide it, or take economic risk based on it's market price.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:15 AM
  #6  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,473
Default

Some regional airframes and flying will go away, while other, larger regional airframes will start replacing mainline narrowbodies.

Growth at any regional at the expense of the mainline partner might be good for one's career short-term via a quick upgrade, but it is VERY bad long-term...unless you intend on being a regional lifer. And regional airlines don't like lifers...they raise the average crew cost with each year of longevity, making them less competitive when compared to companies with lower average longevity.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:23 AM
  #7  
Gets ALL Days Off
 
UnlimitedAkro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Sit down comedian.
Posts: 958
Default

Both the majors and the regionals will go away.
UnlimitedAkro is offline  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:37 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: FO
Posts: 247
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I'm not sure the majors will go that route. If they had to pay for their own fuel, regionals are not going to sign a contract that guarantees financial losses...they will raise their prices to cover fuel. Additionally, based on recent events, they will likely add some extra on top of that to account for unforseen fuel price hikes...sort of like hedging.

This means that majors who force their feeders to pay for fuel will have to pay a premium, putting them at a competetive disadavantage. Other majors might decide to just better manage their fuel price situation (hedging, etc), and take advantage of lower-priced feed.

Regionals are not in the business of participating in the marketplace...they are are very effecient (well in some cases) technical specialists. The general contractor worries about all the subs and the price of materiels. The drywall guy just installs the drywall...he doesn't usually provide it, or take economic risk based on it's market price.
Your positive outlook for your job fascinates me. I wish I had the same positive outlook, but unfortunately I am a realist. Do you really think that a major airline will sign a contract with a regional that guarantees the major financial losses? Why do you think delta is trying to get rid of Mesa, AA is reducing Eagle's flying, Horizon is going to an all TP fleet, Frontier dropped RAH all-together, and CAL is reducing XJT's flying and replacing some of it with TP's.

If the price of the installed drywall is so much that the value of the home is less than the amount invested to build it, then the general contractor would put in some sweet 80's paneling instead. The writing is on the wall (no pun intended).

Flex
Flex81 is offline  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:40 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: CR7 FO
Posts: 141
Default

I see the regionals going back to their roots. Turboprops flying pax to hubs so they can connect to bigger mainliners. Only difference now is that they will be bigger props going to bigger mainliners but less frequently and full to the gills. Just my 2 cents.
ChickenFlight is offline  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:43 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: FO
Posts: 247
Default

Originally Posted by ChickenFlight View Post
I see the regionals going back to their roots. Turboprops flying pax to hubs so they can connect to bigger mainliners. Only difference now is that they will be bigger props going to bigger mainliners but less frequently and full to the gills. Just my 2 cents.
I hope you are right for the sake of this industry.
Flex81 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Marty MCfly
Regional
72
04-16-2008 07:44 AM
aerospacepilot
Major
51
10-06-2007 03:56 AM
sigtauenus
Regional
24
09-20-2007 02:58 PM
alpha23
Regional
9
08-30-2007 06:45 AM
ChrisH
Regional
8
11-15-2005 06:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices