Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Interesting Article About Larger RJ's >

Interesting Article About Larger RJ's

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Interesting Article About Larger RJ's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2007 | 05:44 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default Interesting Article About Larger RJ's

http://www.aero-news.net/news/commai...37f8&Dynamic=1
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 07:34 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: HMMWV in Iraq
Default

Hmm, the article seemed to focus on the cost per seat per mile based on fuel as compared to larger aircraft, wonder how that cost per seat comparison looks once they figure in pilot pay being significantly cheaper on the RJ's.
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 11:04 AM
  #3  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,869
Likes: 664
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by sigtauenus
Hmm, the article seemed to focus on the cost per seat per mile based on fuel as compared to larger aircraft, wonder how that cost per seat comparison looks once they figure in pilot pay being significantly cheaper on the RJ's.

Lower pilot cost has historically not been a sufficient offset factor to make RJ's competetive on routes that can fill a narrowbody. RJ's are only cost-competetive on routes that have too few PAX to fill a 73/bus. They are also used on routes where the PAX desire frequency, ie 3-4 RJ's per day instead of two daily 737's gives the customers more planning flexibility...this has become a MAJOR marketing factor.

The problem with RJ's is that they have pretty much the same avionics and the same number of engines, generators, HYD pumps, etc as a narrowbody. The RJ parts are SLIGHTLY cheaper to manufacture due to being smaller, but the design and maintenance costs are almost the same as on a larger twin-engine airplane.

RJ's also burn more fuel per passenger than larger airplanes.
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 11:11 AM
  #4  
HSLD's Avatar
APC co-founder
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 0
From: B777
Default

Another factor that rarely gets attention in the RJ vs narrowbody economic debate is the cargo carrying capacity. Most legacy airlines have a dedicated cargo division that uses belly space in the domestic fleet for distribution. The advantage of a slight cost savings by deploying regional jets is offset or lost by the inability to carry cargo.
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 05:11 PM
  #5  
robthree's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: 777, sofa
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD
Another factor that rarely gets attention in the RJ vs narrowbody economic debate is the cargo carrying capacity. Most legacy airlines have a dedicated cargo division that uses belly space in the domestic fleet for distribution. The advantage of a slight cost savings by deploying regional jets is offset or lost by the inability to carry cargo.
Not to mention checked bags. In a ten year career as a CAL rampie, the only time 737s left bags behind was on long central & S. America legs requiring alternates. RJs tend to leave bags behind on far more pedestrian segments. At an average of $50 to deliver each bag, the RJ savings can disapear entirely. But the department that pays for bag delivery is different from the one that pays for AC operations... Who wants to bet that butt covering bean counters never calculate the true cost difference between a RJ and a Narrowbody?
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 06:17 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

So how bout we get some more friggin 73s and Busses out there at mainline already!?!? And all you numb nuts tripping over yourselves to fly a CR9 or E190 at the regionals, KNOCK IT OFF! All you are doing is increasing your time at regionals and reducing the number of mainline jobs out there worth going to.

*steps off the soap box*
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 06:27 PM
  #7  
Slice's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
From: Spartan
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
So how bout we get some more friggin 73s and Busses out there at mainline already!?!? And all you numb nuts tripping over yourselves to fly a CR9 or E190 at the regionals, KNOCK IT OFF! All you are doing is increasing your time at regionals and reducing the number of mainline jobs out there worth going to.

*steps off the soap box*
So when are you gonna stop flying your 50 seater and get back into a Saab or Beech to help the cause?
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 06:30 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Originally Posted by Slice
So when are you gonna stop flying your 50 seater and get back into a Saab or Beech to help the cause?
Believe it or not, I don't make the fleet decisions at my company. Crazy, right?
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 06:32 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by robthree
Not to mention checked bags. In a ten year career as a CAL rampie, the only time 737s left bags behind was on long central & S. America legs requiring alternates. RJs tend to leave bags behind on far more pedestrian segments. At an average of $50 to deliver each bag, the RJ savings can disapear entirely. But the department that pays for bag delivery is different from the one that pays for AC operations... Who wants to bet that butt covering bean counters never calculate the true cost difference between a RJ and a Narrowbody?
There's a simple solution to this: stop letting people pack so much crap. I suggest the following formula:
(number of days on trip) x 10 = luggage allotment in pounds
If you're going on a weekend trip, you do not need a "heavy" and two carry-ons.
Reply
Old 07-07-2007 | 06:32 PM
  #10  
Slice's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
From: Spartan
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
Believe it or not, I don't make the fleet decisions at my company. Crazy, right?
Exactly, just like the guys you were speaking about above.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kevinc5
Cargo
4
07-01-2007 04:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices