![]() |
How The [ATP] Rule Reduces Safety
|
Big claim from somebody who isn't a licensed pilot and has never been though a 121 training program.
|
Lol, the regionals aren't even hiring FOs anyways.
|
Don’t engage
|
Ugh. Another "1500 hour rule" critic. At least he could have called it out correctly. It's an ATP reg, specifically 121.436.
|
Well, that's just his (uninformed) opinion, man.
The non-pilot author should realize (and would if he had bothered to talk to any pilots) that a great deal of learning takes place during that 1,500 hours. Both from teaching and watching mistakes. Experience is the greatest instructor. Weird how insurance rates decrease with hours. <-- free market at work, SonicFlyer. But then again, he is "frequent traveler"-certified. |
One way it has made us less safe is that the regionals have essentially hired anyone with a pulse over the last few years.
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3647872)
One way it has made us less safe is that the regionals have essentially hired anyone with a pulse over the last few years.
|
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
(Post 3647867)
Well, that's just his (uninformed) opinion, man.
The non-pilot author should realize (and would if he had bothered to talk to any pilots) that a great deal of learning takes place during that 1,500 hours. Both from teaching and watching mistakes. Experience is the greatest instructor. Weird how insurance rates decrease with hours. <-- free market at work, SonicFlyer. But then again, he is "frequent traveler"-certified. |
Originally Posted by Stan446
(Post 3647915)
A long time ago, You flew as an FE and got a few years to see how the operation was run and how the plane was flown. Pretty good seat to see whats going on. Hard to say whats enough experience. If a person can fly the sim and meet the ATP requirements, but not the hours, is the 1,500hrs really a valid indication of ability?
1,500 hours is only one of the experience criteria for the ATP; it has never been a question of whether 1,500 hours is "enough," but of certification, and meeting a minimum certification standard. For many years, a commercial pilot certificate was considered adequate, and there have been periods when airline pilots have been hired at the bare minimum value for the commercial certificate. The commercial, however, does not require that an applicant perform to the same standard as the ATP. A type rating does conform to the same standard as the ATP. Whereas in the past, new airline pilots were not necessarily type rated right away, and later the advent of the idiotic "SIC type" became chic for ICAO compliance, and the withholding of a "full ATP type" held some control by the employer over the employee (giving the employee a thing of value), today pilots train to the full type, to ATP standards, and they're expected to perform at that standard. The only pilot certificate that meets that standard, or requires it, is the ATP. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:30 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands