![]() |
Originally Posted by CHQ Pilot
(Post 218688)
*snip* If you really want to have fun, fly a SAAB or a Jetstream or learn from those that have. *snip*
|
Originally Posted by plasticpi
(Post 218693)
Yeah! Finally some respect for an airplane you actually have to fly!
Point being, if thats where you end up, whats so wrong with starting out from the beginning in an RJ that way? |
Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
(Post 218764)
With all due respect for the stick and rudder skills of those that fly turboprops...why get so hung up on it? Unless you plan to make a career at say PDT, flying Dash 8's you will eventually move on to flying a bigger, more automated turbo-fan powered aircraft where you will find yourself monitoring the A/P.
Point being, if thats where you end up, whats so wrong with starting out from the beginning in an RJ that way? |
Originally Posted by CL65driver
(Post 218066)
EMBRAER: Every Mechanical Breakdown Requires An Electrical Reset .... so true! Embraer added this nice little feature that tells you how strong the GPU you're using is... when you start the APU, you just count how many displays go out! :p |
Originally Posted by matlok
(Post 219028)
ROTFL!!!
Embraer added this nice little feature that tells you how strong the GPU you're using is... when you start the APU, you just count how many displays go out! :p :p |
Only CRJ pilots will avoid the truth. And the truth is, the ERJ is superior. More automated and climbs better. The CRJ is a DOG above 20,000' or so. You may hear CRJ people say "the CRJ is faster!" Whoop di doo!! By 15 knots. Wow.
Originally Posted by diseda
(Post 217980)
Does anyone have any preference and why?
|
Originally Posted by RightSeatDude
(Post 219114)
Only CRJ pilots will avoid the truth. And the truth is, the ERJ is superior. More automated and climbs better. The CRJ is a DOG above 20,000' or so. You may hear CRJ people say "the CRJ is faster!" Whoop di doo!! By 15 knots. Wow.
On the other hand, the CRJ 700 is a whole different animal. 1.5-2.5 all the way up to altitude at cruise, automation is much better, 2 FA's, and there is a forward lav so "just in case" you don't have to take the walk of shame. It is more like a "real" airliner. But since I never have flown an ERJ, I won't bash it. From what I do understand, the CRJ is much more comfortable in the flightdeck and quieter. Which to me is much more important then anything else. There is nothing better than sliding your seat all the way back, kicking your feet up and stretching your legs out on the kick plate, drinking a cup of coffee, reading with your headsets off (above 18k of course) and relaxing. Oh and who cares about speed until the "go home" leg. I get paid block or better. |
Thanks! I have heard that the CRJ is a lot quieter and roomier in the cockpit too.
|
Originally Posted by Skyranger777
(Post 219121)
On the other hand, the CRJ 700 is a whole different animal.
When comparing aircraft, you should place the -700 against the 170/175, not the 145. |
I actually had the 200 in mind when comparing to the 145.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands