Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Continental hints

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2007 | 06:56 AM
  #21  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 119
Default

I think there are too many former regional pilots at CAL now for folks to expect that pilot group to just roll over to management's desires for outsourcing aircraft. Demographics there have shifted quite a bit since Contract 02...and people have seen the "damage" done to Delta and US Airways mainline pilot groups with "large small jets" being outsourced.

Jobs are more important than a few extra dollars an hour...and those small narrowbody jobs would be at risk with 70+ seats at Express.

It'd take a pretty farkin' big carrot for those folks to give up turbojet scope to the size of 175s, IMO.
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 07:13 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

But with a large number of retirements coming up and the carrot is retirement, what do you think those guys care about?
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 07:18 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
I'll bid for whatever offers me the highest QOL and pay. QOL before pay. I'll go CRJ if it gets me home. It's up to Continental pilots not to offer it. Once it's on the table it's on the table and it will stay there. I'm in no position to speak against my company for flying them. They flew Saabs and Metroliners back in the day. It wasn't until someone decided to outsource more that they jumped at the opportunity to expand. I can't blame a company for wanting to make more money just as I can't blame pilots for wanting to make more. So to answer your question if there's a 170CA slot in IAH and I can get it you bet your ass. It's not because of small pay increase or because it's a bigger plane. It's because of QOL. I could care less if I flew a 135 so long as I was paid well. It's up to the union not to let that slot in IAH show up. People simply aren't going to quit working in some sort of silent protest.
I think you've said all you need to right there. Maybe you should just stop paying your union dues right now. Its that attitude of "it's out of my hands, I do just do whats best for me and the rest of you be damned" that has gotten us where we are at today. I have heard that exact same argument come out of the mouths of SCABS at CAL. "I just did what I had to do for my career/my family/my ego/whatever and this opportunity was there so I took it. It's not my fault the old Continental pilots went on strike." You hear the same BS come pouring out of the mouths of the morons at GoJet. Don't know about y'all but it makes me a little sick.
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 07:54 AM
  #24  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
I think you've said all you need to right there. Maybe you should just stop paying your union dues right now. Its that attitude of "it's out of my hands, I do just do whats best for me and the rest of you be damned" that has gotten us where we are at today. I have heard that exact same argument come out of the mouths of SCABS at CAL. "I just did what I had to do for my career/my family/my ego/whatever and this opportunity was there so I took it. It's not my fault the old Continental pilots went on strike." You hear the same BS come pouring out of the mouths of the morons at GoJet. Don't know about y'all but it makes me a little sick.
So you think by saying "I don't like regionals flying larger than 50 seat aircraft for carriers" means I should do some sort of silent protest and not take the upgrade? As if management would actually even take notice. All I can do in my current situation is be supportive of the CAL group and hope their union takes care of this. This hypothetical situation of yours is not here yet so I'm not having to deal with it. I hope I never do. If the only way you could upgrade in your company was to go into the left seat of a 70 seater would you refuse and stay as an FO making crappy pay or would you take it? Give me an honest answer on that one.

If the union lets it happen then THEY let it happen.
GoJets is a whole different story. Once the companies agree on it then that's it. There was no alter ego creation and people being scabs flocking to support it. The union and management will have agreed to make it happen. How are you stabbing someone in the back once they've agreed on it? Like I said. I hope the union doesn't let CAL get away with it.

If XJT had 170's on property based in your home you're telling me you skip upgrade, sit there as an FO making half the pay, and double leg commute to work before taking the upgrade as some type of silent protest? If you don't like my response then tough. Honestly I'd rather fly a 145 as I actually enjoy FLYING and since we don't have ACARS the captains in them usually pull more. The situation you tried to deal me is a sandbag attempt to make me out to be something I'm not and that's a lowballer scab. Now you answer your exact questions honestly. I doubt ANYONE could do it any different.

Last edited by de727ups; 09-28-2007 at 08:14 AM. Reason: tit for tat edited out
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 07:58 AM
  #25  
ScaryKite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Powered parachute, left seat
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
I agree, Toilet is starting to get on my nerves.................

i think everyone is getting on my nerves......and I am getting on theirs!, lets take a couple posts of silence to just reflect!
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 08:15 AM
  #26  
de727ups's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,357
Likes: 0
From: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Default

I heavily edited several posts is this thread. You guys need to lay off the personal attacks.
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 08:43 AM
  #27  
robthree's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: 777, sofa
Default

Originally Posted by whiskerbizkit
But with a large number of retirements coming up and the carrot is retirement, what do you think those guys care about?
If I understand correctly CAL doesn't have a DBP to liquidate, as Lorenzo got rid of it a long time ago. Again, if I understand correctly, they have a rather well funded DCP. In the '02 concessionary contract one of the things the pilot group got in trade for their pay cuts was a proviso to the effect that CAL could not post a profit until CAL had made a 500M contribution to the pension fund.

There isn't a lot of leverage CAL has over the retirement fund, its all in the individual pilot's names, like a super 401k.

They might give up scope for the end of PBS. I haven't heard anyone at CAL say anything good about it.

But I doubt it. While CAL has been growing mainline everybody else has been growing their regional partners. If they give up scope, growth at CAL will screetch to a halt; they'll start parking the 737-300s and -500s, and Republic will pick up all that short haul single aisle flying, on their way to becoming the worlds largest airline.
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 08:54 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: ERJ FO
Default

Some facts of life:

1. The CAL pilot group ain't letting go of it's scope clause. If they did, I would call them all stupid. Everyone else should too. The only way you should ever see a 170/175 with CAL colors on it is if two mainline pilots are sitting up front.

2. CHQ didn't TAKE your flying at XJT. CAL took it, then put it up for bid. We got it. If we didn't get it, someone else would. Would you rather have a company with no union work those flights?

3. CAL will take more XJT flying. And they will probably give it to someone other than CHQ. And then you guys can all blame them for stealing your jobs. I don't think CAL is really interested in having all of their regional flying hinge on one or even two companies.

4. XJT will begin flying for other mainline carriers. They already started for DAL. I would expect to see them as front-runners in any RFP's should they come out. Of course, that just makes them closer and closer to being exactly what CHQ is now.
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 09:52 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by de727ups
I heavily edited several posts is this thread. You guys need to lay off the personal attacks.
My long post is gone...........I dont think I said anything too bad.........
Reply
Old 09-28-2007 | 02:23 PM
  #30  
Sanchez's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: ERJ Right Seat
Default

All I can say after wasting 5 minutes of my life reading this thread is shame on you if you believe that is ok for CAL to get rid of scope! Shame on you if you're ok with flying 70-90 seaters that belong to mainline! And shame on you if you think your actions only affect your career.

If you support getting rid of scope clause at CAL, well, you're no different than a gojets pilot.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
COTriple7
Major
0
07-19-2007 11:20 PM
Calpilot
Major
0
07-28-2005 11:21 AM
captain_drew
Major
6
04-01-2005 09:21 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-21-2005 03:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices