![]() |
New Delta Service to Mexico (from LAX)
Saw an ad for new service from LAX. Is ExpressJet doing this, or SkyWest ?
La Paz - Dec 15 Acapulco - Dec 16 Loreto - Dec 18 Mazatlan - Dec 22 Culiacan - Jan 6 Manzanillo - Jan 16 Zacatecas - Jan 16 Hermosillo - Feb 1 Torreon - Mar 8 |
Just a thought: try looking it up on Delta's website.
|
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 257106)
Saw an ad for new service from LAX. Is ExpressJet doing this, or SkyWest ?
La Paz - Dec 15 Acapulco - Dec 16 Loreto - Dec 18 Mazatlan - Dec 22 Culiacan - Jan 6 Manzanillo - Jan 16 Zacatecas - Jan 16 Hermosillo - Feb 1 Torreon - Mar 8 |
Of course you are ASSuming that it wont be mainline flying.....
|
Originally Posted by HercDriver130
(Post 257125)
Of course you are ASSuming that it wont be mainline flying.....
EDITED for grammar thanks to Herc |
whats an "online" mainline jet? :)
and I think you could easily see mainline aircraft flying into at least 3 of those 9 airports. The others would be suspect certainly. |
Originally Posted by HercDriver130
(Post 257131)
whats an "online" mainline jet? :)
and I think you could easily see mainline aircraft flying into at least 3 of those 9 airports. The others would be suspect certainly. |
i would say that was a good estimate.. maybe LaPaz as well at certain times of the year..... just have to wait and see.
|
To answer the original question....the routes that will be flown by DCI will be flown by XJT. Because of UA's hub at LAX, SKW cannot fly routes for them and DL out of the same airport, except for LAX-SLC.
|
Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
(Post 257172)
To answer the original question....the routes that will be flown by DCI will be flown by XJT. Because of UA's hub at LAX, SKW cannot fly routes for them and DL out of the same airport, except for LAX-SLC.
|
Originally Posted by ryane946
(Post 257175)
I am pretty sure United just gave up their exclusivity agreement in LAX for Skywest as a result of the deal to trade 18 EMB-120's for 18 CRJ-700's, and 4 CRJ-200's for CRJ-700's.
|
Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
(Post 257172)
To answer the original question....the routes that will be flown by DCI will be flown by XJT. Because of UA's hub at LAX, SKW cannot fly routes for them and DL out of the same airport, except for LAX-SLC.
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 257189)
yeah, thats no longer correct, but Im glad they chose us over SkyWest
|
i suspect tin is right, both may bet a bit of that pie.
|
I'm not sure if some of these cities had been discontinued and are just now re-opening, but I've personnally done all but 2 of those destinations in Jul-Aug of this year.
|
Never mind. Somebody else said it.
|
I just looked through the DL schedule and it looks like all of the flights will be operated by XJT, except the Acapulco flight which shows as a Mainline (B738).
|
Originally Posted by CRJDriver
(Post 257248)
I just looked through the DL schedule and it looks like all of the flights will be operated by XJT, except the Acapulco flight which shows as a Mainline (B738).
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257318)
With fuel being what it is, i'm not sure why Delta would want a crappy 50 seat jet on those flights? CRJ or ERJ 50 seat jets suck.
|
Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
(Post 257172)
To answer the original question....the routes that will be flown by DCI will be flown by XJT. Because of UA's hub at LAX, SKW cannot fly routes for them and DL out of the same airport, except for LAX-SLC.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 257344)
This limitation has been lifted by a renegotiation of the SKW UAX deal. Presumably they would not have negotiated to get rid of it if they didn't intend to fly for someone (probably DAL) out of LAX.
|
Originally Posted by ChinsFive
(Post 257347)
Haven't seen this anywhere reliable in writing. Just on the forums.
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257318)
With fuel being what it is, i'm not sure why Delta would want a crappy 50 seat jet on those flights? CRJ or ERJ 50 seat jets suck.
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 257543)
yeah maybe they should use that crappy archaic Brasilia
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257688)
I was thinking more on the lines of a 700/900.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 257692)
Oh, because its so much better than a 50 seater. NEWS FLASH!!! A 700/900 is still an RJ. You can put a bow on a terd, but its still a terd.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 257692)
Oh, because its so much better than a 50 seater. NEWS FLASH!!! A 700/900 is still an RJ. You can put a bow on a terd, but its still a terd.
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 257706)
You sure you're a CA! This comment pretty absurd!
I know you guys are in love with the 700/900s and probably feel like you got a couple brass ones swinging between your legs but that doesn't change the fact that THEY ARE STILL RJS!!! |
Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
(Post 257725)
But pretty darn accurate!:D
I know you guys are in love with the 700/900s and probably feel like you got a couple brass ones swinging between your legs but that doesn't change the fact that THEY ARE STILL RJS!!! Just like the CR7/9 is replacing the CR2's; the E-series is replacing the ERJ’s. Just look at RAH. Airlines, regardless of regionals or mainline, have to adapt to the ever changing markets they serve. That's all this is. We as pilots must fight to get paid what we're worth as the airlines change their fleet and continue to grow while feeding us BS lies in order to increase profitability. |
......................Double post
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257688)
I was thinking more on the lines of a 700/900.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 257692)
Oh, because its so much better than a 50 seater. NEWS FLASH!!! A 700/900 is still an RJ. You can put a bow on a terd, but its still a terd.
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257820)
As far as PAX go, it is much better.
|
Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
(Post 257725)
But pretty darn accurate!:D
I know you guys are in love with the 700/900s and probably feel like you got a couple brass ones swinging between your legs but that doesn't change the fact that THEY ARE STILL RJS!!! |
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 257824)
no its not, the seats are so uncomfortable, and the windows are down by their knees
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257827)
And yes I voted for ALPA
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257826)
It has nothing to do "our" love of the 700/900. They just make more sense to fly.
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257820)
As far as PAX go, it is much better.
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 257824)
no its not, the seats are so uncomfortable, and the windows are down by their knees
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 258098)
No, they don't because the loads don't call for it. It makes sense to keep those RJ's on routes that have higher loads. Thats why they don't put the 700/900 on the same routes as the 120. Think about it.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 258098)
No, they don't because the loads don't call for it. It makes sense to keep those RJ's on routes that have higher loads. Thats why they don't put the 700/900 on the same routes as the 120. Think about it.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands