Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pre-9/11 Pay scales

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2007 | 02:55 PM
  #1  
soon2bfo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat... Forever
Default Pre-9/11 Pay scales

I have heard a lot of people make reference (saabarowksi) to the pay scales before the attacks of September 11, but I can't seem to find them anywhere. I find the odd reference to a yearly amount, but no actual scale anywhere. Does anybody have a link or the scale itself that they can post so I can get some perspective. I would like to see SkyWest, ExpressJet, Republic, etc. as well as the majors. Thanks.
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 03:09 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Saw this link in the Majors forum, very disheartening...........

http://www.landings.com/_landings/st...ainicarus.html
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 119
Default

Comair 6/01 50 seat payrates (the ones they struck for)
CA FO
1. $54.40 21.00
2. $56.09 33.53
3. $57.81 34.57
4. $59.61 35.64
5. $61.45 37.88
6. $63.35 39.06
7. $65.31 40.25
8. $67.33
9. $69.41
10. $71.56
11. $73.77
12. $76.05
13. $78.41
14. $80.83
15. $83.33
16. $85.83
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 03:54 PM
  #4  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 119
Default

Those same CMR CBA 2001 50 seat rates, effective 6/05.

1. $63.02 24.45
2. $64.98 38.85
3. $66.96 40.05
4. $69.06 41.29
5. $71.20 42.56
6. $73.39 43.90
7. $75.66 45.26
8. $78.01 46.64
9. $80.41
10. $82.91
11. $85.47
12. $88.10
13. $90.84
14. $93.64
15. $100.00
16. $101.75
17. $103.25
18. $105.55
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 03:55 PM
  #5  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 119
Default

Comair 2001 CBA CRJ-700 rates (6/05)
CA FO
1 $69.32 $24.45
2 $71.48 $42.89
3 $73.66 $44.20
4 $75.97 $45.58
5 $78.32 $46.99
6 $80.73 $48.44
7 $83.23 $49.94
8 $85.81 $51.49
9 $89.26
10 $92.86
11 $95.73
12 $98.67
13 $101.74
14 $104.88
15 $108.12
16 $111.36
17 $114.71
18 $118.22
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 03:55 PM
  #6  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 119
Default

AWAC 2001 CBA BAe-146 rates (8/05)

CA FO
1 ------ $25.50
2 $78.76 $47.26
3 $81.18 $48.71
4 $83.70 $50.22
5 $86.29 $51.77
6 $88.96 $53.37
7 $91.71 $55.03
8 $94.54 $56.73
9 $97.47 $58.48
10 $100.48 $60.29
11 $103.59
12 $106.79
13 $110.10
14 $113.50
15 $117.01
16 $120.52
17 $124.14
18 $127.86
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 04:04 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Exclamation

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
AWAC 2001 CBA BAe-146 rates (8/05)

CA FO
1 ------ $25.50
2 $78.76 $47.26
3 $81.18 $48.71
4 $83.70 $50.22
5 $86.29 $51.77
6 $88.96 $53.37
7 $91.71 $55.03
8 $94.54 $56.73
9 $97.47 $58.48
10 $100.48 $60.29
11 $103.59
12 $106.79
13 $110.10
14 $113.50
15 $117.01
16 $120.52
17 $124.14
18 $127.86
This is what 50 seat pay should look like, with the adjustment of inflation for the last 6 years.......... Could you imagine how much better life would be at this level...............we have to step it up boys.............

Last edited by JoeyMeatballs; 11-05-2007 at 04:10 PM.
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 04:49 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Satan's Camaro
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
Saw this link in the Majors forum, very disheartening...........

http://www.landings.com/_landings/st...ainicarus.html
Disheartening, yes, but not unreasonably so. I'm not sure that I can argue that even the minority most senior pilots should be earning close to a million dollars a year. And I don't think average airline pilot pay is $100k.

Raising fairs is also a dangerous game. While I definitely agree that the latest rush of decreasing ticket prices just to get as close to 100% load factor is financially irresponsible, the Supply Demand curve works both ways. Give out too much supply and your revenues decrease. Take away too much supply (effectively price people out of flying, and for more people than you'd think, $60 does make or break the deal), and your revenues decrease. There needs to be a happy medium. Let's say an airplane has 100 seats. If you sell 90 seats for 100 dollars, you make $9000. Sell 80 seats for $120, you make $9600. Yes, you priced 10 people out of flying, but you retained the other 80 people, for whom $120 isn't too much money. Why do you think WN does so well with it's 60-75% load factors, while Herb says "We aim for load factors in the mid 60s to 70%"? It's because WN is able to still price competitively and OPTIMIZE its load factors to provide the maximum revenue.

Anyway, back to pilot pay: yes, you're absolutely right that, especially at the bottom end, they've become criminally low, especially considering the responsibility on pilots' shoulders. But does that mean that a 15% biannual pay raise per year should be sustainable? I don't know about that.

A great pilot I know once said to me "Pilots don't get paid to fly the airplane while it's working. Pilots get paid to fly the airplane when **** hits the fan." And that's absolutely right. While you may pay 100 pilots $100,000 a year for 25 years (my math brings up $250m), think about the impact of those well rested, well paid, competent, happy, and intelligent pilots during just one hairy situation in those 25 years(hitting the runway on a CATIII/II, or performing checklists correctly). It doesn't even have to be a hairy situation per pilot. If because you have that competent and happy pilot in the cockpit you only avert one accident in those 25 years, you've saved money, seeing as accidents are measured in the range of about a billion dollars (internal study, will not cite source) when you count all collateral damage, liability, and actual loses, you've just saved yourself $750m. Of course, you need to figure out exactly how many pilots you have and what their actual average salary is, but keep in mind, this is still a very real and very valid example, because while you increase your pilot pool, you increase your flight numbers, which just increases your chances of a crash. Worth it? Worth it.

Last edited by boilerpilot; 11-05-2007 at 04:59 PM.
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 04:53 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Exclamation

Originally Posted by boilerpilot
Disheartening, yes, but not unreasonably so. I'm not sure that I can argue that even the minority most senior pilots should be earning close to a million dollars a year. And I don't think average airline pilot pay is $100k.

Raising fairs is also a dangerous game. While I definitely agree that the latest rush of decreasing ticket prices just to get as close to 100% load factor is financially irresponsible, the Supply Demand curve works both ways. Give out too much supply and your revenues decrease. Take away too much supply (effectively price people out of flying, and for more people than you'd think, $60 does make or break the deal), and your revenues decrease. There needs to be a happy medium. Let's say an airplane has 100 seats. If you sell 90 seats for 100 dollars, you make $9000. Sell 80 seats for $120, you make $9600. Yes, you priced 10 people out of flying, but you retained the other 80 people, for whom $120 isn't too much money. Why do you think WN does so well with it's 60-75% load factors, while Herb says "We aim for load factors in the mid 60s to 70%"? It's because WN is able to still price competitively and OPTIMIZE its load factors to provide the maximum revenue.

Anyway, back to pilot pay: yes, you're absolutely right that, especially at the bottom end, they've become criminally low, especially considering the responsibility on pilots' shoulders. But does that mean that a 15% biannual pay raise per year should be sustainable? I don't know about that.

A great pilot I know once said to me "Pilots don't get paid to fly the airplane while it's working. Pilots get paid to fly the airplane when **** hits the fan." And that's absolutely right. While you may pay 100 pilots $100,000 a year for 25 years (my math brings up $250m), think about the impact of those well rested, well paid, competent, happy, and intelligent pilots during just one hairy situation in those 25 years(hitting the runway on a CATIII/II, or performing checklists correctly). It doesn't even have to be a hairy situation per pilot. If because you have that competent and happy pilot in the cockpit you only avert one accident in those 25 years, you've saved money, seeing as accidents are measured in the range of about a billion dollars (internal study, will not cite source) when you count all collateral damage, liability, and actual loses, you've just saved yourself $750m. Worth it? Worth it.

excellent post!
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 04:59 PM
  #10  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Comair 2001 CBA CRJ-700 rates (6/05)
CA FO
1 $69.32 $24.45
2 $71.48 $42.89
3 $73.66 $44.20
4 $75.97 $45.58
5 $78.32 $46.99
6 $80.73 $48.44
7 $83.23 $49.94
8 $85.81 $51.49
9 $89.26
10 $92.86
11 $95.73
12 $98.67
13 $101.74
14 $104.88
15 $108.12
16 $111.36
17 $114.71
18 $118.22
Man, looks like Comair makes a pretty penny. They are getting mainline pay. US Airways E-190 FO pay is $41/hour. I guess I should went to Comair.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
L'il J.Seinfeld
Military
39
03-08-2013 02:45 PM
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
edik
Major
31
09-06-2011 01:23 PM
4everFO
Regional
4
02-14-2006 03:11 PM
Uncle Bose
Hangar Talk
1
02-09-2006 06:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices