Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   PNCL Scope Ruling (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/22593-pncl-scope-ruling.html)

GliderCFI 02-21-2008 09:10 AM

So tell me Colgan Pilots, do you regret not voting ALPA in now?

LoudFastRules 02-21-2008 10:03 AM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 324419)
the ruling will be in our favor as i said a couple of weeks ago. i thought they were going to say something more in our last confrence call but i heard from some good sources, a couple weeks ago, that "once phil and his gang see the ruling they will go ape ****" the ruling is coming and is an obvious violation of our scope clause. like higney said i wish for no ill will between us and our colgan pilots.

as far as seniority list merger goes i have heard of several different ways that it could go.

1. a 2 for 1 merging of the seniority list. for example a guy that had been at colgan for 2 years would be placed in line with the guys that have been at pinnacle for 1 year.. and so on, and so on

2. relative seniority merging. for example a guy that is in the middle of the pack at colgan, will be put in the middle of the pack at pinnacle. a guy in the top 10% at colgan, will be placed in the top 10% at pinnacle.

not sure if i like either way but i am sure it will be as fair as they can get since none of the pilots started this mess, we just have to clean it up.

Just to throw in my $.02:

It seems that the "relative seniority" method of merging lists is the only fair way to go. All of this "my airline is better than yours" nonsense is killing pilot unity and handing management victories hand over fist while they laugh their ways to the bank. The game of "Who's top?" vs. "Who's bottom?" has to end. Both companies always bring something to the table, and regardless of relative worth, the pilot group of any airline should not ever be punished. That is a surefire way to kill pilot unity and morale for years down the road.

Now, I'm sure their are ways to slightly modify the relative method to slightly adjust for upcoming retirements or slews of new hires at one company vs. no new hires at the other. However, these should only be slight adjustments. Screwing your partner in a merger is NEVER a good idea.

Finally, it would do ALPA a world of good to be exceptionally fair to Colgan despite their not choosing union representation. It's time for a good PR drive backed by actions at ALPA. Besides, it was a very close vote. There are a lot of pro-ALPA folks at Colgan, after all.

nicholasblonde 02-21-2008 10:11 AM

Wouldn't PNCL management try to seat-lock 9E pilots into their respective a/c, and also seat-lock Colgan pilots into whatever a/c they're currently on? I would think if the seniority lists were merged that mgmt would setup something like Republic/Chataq/Shuttle, where you've got one seniority list, but you're hired onto a certificate and seat-locked for 2 years due to costs of retraining lateral a/c transfers.

Evidence=ATL flying at 9E with the 2 yr seat lock for pilots transferring/assigned to that base.

King Lear 02-21-2008 10:15 AM

Very simple take Colgan Pilots and STAPLE them to the BOTTOM on the Pinnacle list.

ALPA will screw everybody with some merge list that sends the existing Pinnacle Pilots backwards. That will be your dues at work!

Remember if this happens and the lists are merged there will be Pinnacle Pilots laid off before Colgan Pilots when the Delta Consolidation takes place.

ToiletDuck 02-21-2008 10:19 AM

It is only fair that Colgan guys get stapled. I don't want to sound rude but it's true. There's no reason a group who voted down a union should receive any bonus because the the other pilot group was unified, paid dues, and used the process.

DMEarc 02-21-2008 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by ToiletDuck (Post 324898)
It is only fair that Colgan guys get stapled. I don't want to sound rude but it's true. There's no reason a group who voted down a union should receive any bonus because the the other pilot group was unified, paid dues, and used the process.

He's right.

usmc-sgt 02-21-2008 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by GliderCFI (Post 324833)
So tell me Colgan Pilots, do you regret not voting ALPA in now?

You would probably have to look elsewhere to find some. Of the Colgan pilots I know of on this site all of them either voted alpa or were hired just after the vote. The majority of pilots I have met at colgan that would actually care enough to read an online forum to keep up with the pulse of the industry also care enough to desire some type of union and the protection and collective bargaining that it would provide.

ToiletDuck 02-21-2008 11:03 AM


Originally Posted by DMEarc (Post 324913)
He's right.

Hey on a side note I thought you were going on the 757?

DMEarc 02-21-2008 11:05 AM


Originally Posted by ToiletDuck (Post 324917)
Hey on a side note I thought you were going on the 757?

So did I! (useless words to make this post more than 10 characters....done)

JetJock16 02-21-2008 11:11 AM


Originally Posted by ToiletDuck (Post 324898)
It is only fair that Colgan guys get stapled. I don't want to sound rude but it's true. There's no reason a group who voted down a union should receive any bonus because the the other pilot group was unified, paid dues, and used the process.

So what you're saying is that only unionized pilots deserve anything and non-unionized pilots are scum? Isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands