Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

$105 barrel of oil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2008, 07:39 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 335
Default $105 barrel of oil

So it seems like oil prices are going to keep getting higher and higher...so my question is, how will this affect the hiring on the regionals this year?
I know that xjt reduced around 20% of the branded flying this month.
papacharlie is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:44 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: dogstyle
Posts: 375
Default

Either way you slice it it can't be good. Overheard SWA on the radio the other day telling ATC to, as of last Monday, expect no greater than .73M in cruise for fuel savings. Ominous.
WhizWheel is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:49 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by papacharlie View Post
So it seems like oil prices are going to keep getting higher and higher...so my question is, how will this affect the hiring on the regionals this year?
I know that xjt reduced around 20% of the branded flying this month.
This is a major concern for the airline industry. Most aviation analysts are saying that the regionals with a lot of 50 seat RJs are going to be in trouble unless they start to unload those smaller jets and replace them with bigger ones. But, at the same time, majors are rethinking their strategy on using RJs with this crazy fuel price. They need to go to at least 100 seat jets to spread the cost and RJs aren't cutting it. There's the scope clause, which is a good thing so they can't go any bigger than 76 seat RJs for the regionals.

There's bound to be a major shakeup in the regionals, and some may not be around when all the dust settles. My guess is that this is one of the reason why NWA is trying to merge with DAL, and if that happens, NWA/DAL will probably try to consolidate their regional flying and distribute them between XJ, XJT, Compass, Skywest and Comair. Don't know about XJT but XJ is planning to hire another 300 or more in 2008. This could change overnight, of course, if this oil price keeps going up.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:33 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
soon2bfo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Right Seat... Forever
Posts: 410
Default

We're all going to be taking the train soon enough. It is the most efficient way to carry weight over any significant distance. Or we can start using Biofuel (yeah right).
soon2bfo is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:44 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airwaves's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Kohler & Toilet
Posts: 125
Default

It's called hydrogen.
Airwaves is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 08:47 AM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Airwaves View Post
It's called hydrogen.
For airplanes? You've been reading too much science fiction.

BTW, where does the H2 come from?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:07 AM
  #7  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Cheap time to buy airline stocks. It's not so much the price of oil that's increasing as it's the value of the dollar decreasing. Since Oil is traded in US dollars and the dollar is some 40-45% down from the norm then the price of oil has risen accordingly. Our goal shouldn't be to lower the price of oil as it should be to raise the value of our economy thus lowering the price of oil. We need to send Afghanistan a letter signed "with love" and get gone. I can understand leaving troups in Iraq for now but the price tag of our military single handily crippled us. Couple that with less new money coming in from all the crisis and things aren't looking too good. Can't sit here and worry about it though it won't solve anything. Want to make a difference? Keep going to work and keep that cash flowing. We don't need stagnation. It's almost as if terrorism did win. Because of the attacks we've seen security and the cost of security go through the roof, every politician uses it as a standpoint to argue for what they want money for. Milk and education vs. using that money to fight terrorism and it's always terrorism that wins that bill. Sooner or later enough is enough. There's reasonable concerns and then there's unreasonable. No reason a tiny town in the middle of nowhere should be getting a million dollars worth of Hazmat suits :/

I'm looking for a fed cut in the middle of March here. Should be the last one for a good while. Couple that with the rebate checks and things should start looking up.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:22 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 951
Default

I agree that unbridled government spending (al la Iraq) has dealt the economy quite a blow. The process of long-term recovery is going to hurt. Unfortunately, it means controlling inflation via the money supply and reducing government debt. Of course, none of this is politically attractive because, as Americans, we have a God-given entitlement to anything we want, right now. And any attempt to defy this ideal will loose public approval, resulting in another "yes-man" moving up to Capitol Hill. And the cycle continues.....
waflyboy is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:24 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,803
Default

Agreed, ToiletDuck...when was the last time anybody overnighted in Canada? Can't even buy a McD's burger for less than $2 US...Our dollar is incredibly weak. Get it strong again and we'll see the price of oil drop appropriately. Then we can worry about the "artificial" rise due to speculators doing their speculating.
ExperimentalAB is online now  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:26 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by waflyboy View Post
I agree that unbridled government spending (al la Iraq) has dealt the economy quite a blow. The process of long-term recovery is going to hurt. Unfortunately, it means controlling inflation via the money supply and reducing government debt. Of course, none of this is politically attractive because, as Americans, we have a God-given entitlement to anything we want, right now. And any attempt to defy this ideal will loose public approval, resulting in another "yes-man" moving up to Capitol Hill. And the cycle continues.....
Very true indeed. The war is estimated to cost us 2.2 billion a day. How much longer can we keep this up? We are in a lot of mess with no end in sight with the likes of Hillary who says had she known then what she knows now, she would not have voted yes to the war.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
14
11-29-2014 05:31 PM
JiffyLube
Major
42
01-03-2008 01:14 PM
RockBottom
Hangar Talk
2
07-08-2007 08:29 AM
Gordon C
Hangar Talk
0
09-14-2005 12:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
08-10-2005 11:36 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices