![]() |
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 355540)
Hmmmmmmm.......ya? That's makes no sense. :confused:
There is no shortage of groups to whipsaw, especially with two separate wholly owed carriers. |
Originally Posted by G2TT
(Post 355542)
Colgan, TSA, CHQ, Republic, PSA, PDT, AWAC, MESA...did I forget anyone? I don't think they need any more regional carriers, I think they would try and fill Mesa's hole with carriers they already have.
There is no shortage of groups to whipsaw, especially with two separate wholly owed carriers. |
Whoever takes the lead in the race to the bottom after MAG folds would get the flying. TSA... Pinnacle... Colgan...? Who wants it guys... how cheap will you work for that "quick" upgrade?
it would be nice if something like that went to AWAC... a change from the East Coast scenery would be nice. |
Originally Posted by groovinaviator
(Post 355550)
Whoever takes the lead in the race to the bottom after MAG folds would get the flying. TSA... Pinnacle... Colgan...? Who wants it guys... how cheap will you work for that "quick" upgrade?
it would be nice if something like that went to AWAC... a change from the East Coast scenery would be nice. |
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 355466)
Hey, who knows, best of luck to you guys.
I'm head back to the Bro where I will be bidding and hopefully holding the best 121 flying in the NATION! That's PDX and SEA. IMO and I've been based in FAT, DEN, SLC, TUS and ATL; PDX flying is the best, bar none! I love flying up here and living up here. Would only leave for a gig on a island. Or the ability to commte to an island. It does rain A LOT though. |
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 355549)
The number of carriers is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.
|
Originally Posted by G2TT
(Post 355562)
Hey, I'm just voicing my opinion. It's really more of what I would want to happen than what I think will happen. If I want to dream of PDT and AWAC getting more airways flying instead of Skywest, well I don't think I'm alone. The number of carriers is not irrelevant to me, if they add another new carrier to replace Mesa, that just means the companies already working for airways didn't get the flying, and that I disagree with (which really doesn't matter, because they aren't going to ask either of us what we think about it).
BTW, I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier. |
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 355566)
I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier.
|
Yes...the very best outcome of this debacle would be that JO never be free to destroy an Airline again.
|
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 355566)
True, we just fly an airplane, we have no influence.
BTW, I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands