Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
What will happen to RAH's 170s with F9? >

What will happen to RAH's 170s with F9?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

What will happen to RAH's 170s with F9?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2008 | 03:27 AM
  #21  
Stryker's Avatar
Kept down by the man
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: 767 CA
Cool

Originally Posted by RJ85FO
Taking a 5% paycut and furloughing 220+ pilots...your definition of "worked out really well" is not the same as mine.
what I meant was that it seems that the airline seems pretty stable now and if I understand correctly it wasn't owned by nwa before. Furloughs and paycuts are never a good thing, but they are still around
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 04:20 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Heavies
Default

Originally Posted by RJ85FO
Taking a 5% paycut and furloughing 220+ pilots...your definition of "worked out really well" is not the same as mine.
yeah ask my boyfriend how well the furloughing went in 2004..... real well
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 05:00 AM
  #23  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by andy171773
Delta will probably not hesitate to grab them.
I doubt that. DAL has always preferred CRJ9 over E175 in the past due to speed and fuel efficiency and I do not see them wanting E170.
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 05:01 AM
  #24  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles
No, they fly 76 seat jets. I too believe they should be mainline airplanes. CR9 and E175 are not regional airplanes, especially given the routes they operate. ATL-COS and ATL-TUS are NOT regional airline routes. Having these aircraft at the regional level hurts us all, as this means fewer job opportunities at the majors.

Mesa flys 80-something seat jets for US. They are high density configured CR9's...yet again, airplanes that I would prefer to see operated at the mainline level.
I agree with Ramen.
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 06:00 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: E170 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
I doubt that. DAL has always preferred CRJ9 over E175 in the past due to speed and fuel efficiency and I do not see them wanting E170.
That's odd, they just ordered more 175s with two class configurations last year. What they do is anybody's guess. Moving those airplanes from F9 to DAL would be a big headache for RAH though. You are talking about displacements then since F9 is flown by RW and DAL is S5 due to scope clauses. It'd be a big training headache for Bedford.
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 06:10 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Delta Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
The 170 and crj 700 hold the same, why are you not giving up your seat for the mainline pilot that ****es and moans about flying a little airplane?
I would happily give up my seat to a mainline pilot. In fact, AA pilots originally operated AE's CR7's. The 700 is a decent size airplane. Too big for a regional jet. DL routes our airplanes as if they were MD88. In the DFW days they would have us fly routes such as DFW-SAN, DFW-DCA, etc.

And no, I am not in for a disappointing career. I was simply stating that I would prefer to see aircraft of these sizes at the mainline level. They are not, and thats just how it goes.

Unfortunately, its much cheaper for mainline carriers to outsource flying to the regional level. That is the root cause of the existence of airlines such as Mesa, GoJet, etc. That is why I believe the demise of Mesa will do us no good, because there will be another bottom feeder out there ready to get as much business as possible at whatever cost is necessary. The problem is, the next one has the potential to be MUCH worse...

But thats a whole different story for another day.
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 06:19 AM
  #27  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by cbire880
That's odd, they just ordered more 175s with two class configurations last year. What they do is anybody's guess. Moving those airplanes from F9 to DAL would be a big headache for RAH though. You are talking about displacements then since F9 is flown by RW and DAL is S5 due to scope clauses. It'd be a big training headache for Bedford.
I was referring to DAL not wanting E170. Don't care about whether RAH wants them or not. DAL has not ordered any E 170s or E175 to my knowledge for anyone, and if they did, they will cancel that order now that the price of oil has reached $120/barrel and keeps going up. NWA is having a second thought about E175s they have on order for Compass. They are testing between Mesaba CRJ9 and Compass E175 to see which one is more cost effective, and I've been told so far CRJ9 is winning out.
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 06:24 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Delta Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
I was referring to DAL not wanting E170. Don't care about whether RAH wants them or not. DAL has not ordered any E 170s or E175 to my knowledge for anyone, and if they did, they will cancel that order now that the price of oil has reached $120/barrel and keeps going up. NWA is having a second thought about E175s they have on order for Compass. They are testing between Mesaba CRJ9 and Compass E175 to see which one is more cost effective, and I've been told so far CRJ9 is winning out.
The CR9 is 40% more efficient at the barberpole than its E170/175 counterparts. The E170, at 40% less efficient, carries 6 fewer passengers than the CR9, which equates to less revenue at higher costs. This is why DL is moving to an all E175 fleet with S5 in the near future.

Speaking of that, anyone know when the DL transition to the 175 will commence?

Last edited by RamenNoodles; 04-12-2008 at 06:32 AM.
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 06:31 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: E170 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
I was referring to DAL not wanting E170. Don't care about whether RAH wants them or not. DAL has not ordered any E 170s or E175 to my knowledge for anyone, and if they did, they will cancel that order now that the price of oil has reached $120/barrel and keeps going up. NWA is having a second thought about E175s they have on order for Compass. They are testing between Mesaba CRJ9 and Compass E175 to see which one is more cost effective, and I've been told so far CRJ9 is winning out.
DAL contracted with RAH to fly additional 175s for them. The deliveries start later this year. RAH buys the airplanes and then operates them for the codeshare. DAL will not actually buy the aircraft as they have for other deals.
Reply
Old 04-12-2008 | 07:33 AM
  #30  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles
The CR9 is 40% more efficient at the barberpole than its E170/175 counterparts. The E170, at 40% less efficient, carries 6 fewer passengers than the CR9, which equates to less revenue at higher costs. This is why DL is moving to an all E175 fleet with S5 in the near future.
That is true, but your next sentence does not make any sense. If CRJ9 is more efficient why would DAL move towards E175 fleet for regionals?

Also, if DAL merges with NWA, don't count on DAL contract with RAH going through. Thta is the word I'ver heard directly from several DAL pilots. DAL will in all likelihood spread regional flying between Comair, Pinnacle and another regional.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WEACLRS
Major
56
02-06-2008 09:52 AM
blueraider
Regional
1
11-20-2007 07:00 AM
HercDriver130
Regional
8
11-09-2007 07:14 PM
saxman66
Regional
20
08-29-2007 01:02 PM
doug_foo
Hangar Talk
3
06-25-2007 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices