![]() |
Originally Posted by Paok
(Post 361740)
yeah ask my boyfriend how well the furloughing went in 2004..... real well :mad:
|
Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
(Post 361873)
That is true, but your next sentence does not make any sense. If CRJ9 is more efficient why would DAL move towards E175 fleet for regionals?
I only was referring to DL replacing S5's E170's with E175. Six more seats for the same fuel efficiency. I was not referring to the CR9 fleet; they are here to stay. |
Originally Posted by Foxcow
(Post 361622)
That being said don't you think the 170s and 175s should be flown by mainline pilots? I think US Airways did it right with the 190s. I believe Air Canada pilots fly their 170s or 175s.
|
Originally Posted by BlueMoon
(Post 361337)
Though Delta wants to cut Domestic Capacity, so I'm not sure that more aircraft are in the immediate plans.
Now if there is a merger, well then I think there would be a demand for them as they could unfortunately be used to replace some DC-9's |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 361914)
A 5yr CA at RAH on the 175 makes about $300 less a month than a 5yr 190 Captain at US Airways. So who's done what right?
Don't forget that RAH payscale includes a 99 seat 190/5. For what its worth I'd rather of seen 170's at mainline. I'd rather of never seen crj900's. You and I have Zero control over any of that, never did. Airways pilots IMHO should of NEVER given up mid atlantic. They did not have much choice with Mesa 900's on the block. What erks me is that everyone is crying effiency yet air canada makes money on 175's. Enough to pay there pilots properly! 3rd year FO $60. Capt $114 And we are talking about an industry leading contract, we'll see. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 361914)
A 5yr CA at RAH on the 175 makes about $300 less a month than a 5yr 190 Captain at US Airways. So who's done what right?
|
Originally Posted by Foxcow
(Post 361955)
It maybe a small difference if we are talking about just the hourly rate x guarantee. How long have the Airways 190s been on property? I'm going to assume not as long as Republic has had 170/175s. I'm quite certain the Airways 190 pay will be going up if the airline doesn't tear itself apart. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that US Airways probably has better workrules too.
|
the DC3 was mainline once too - 21 to 29 seats. look at the fleet histories of the majors. do you see a trend or a conspiracy? it's simple economics, the sub 100 seat flying is not going to the mainline and nobody laments this more than I.
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 361914)
A 5yr CA at RAH on the 175 makes about $300 less a month than a 5yr 190 Captain at US Airways. So who's done what right?
|
As was said above, Airways 190 rates don't matter much since people don't stay put there. Most of the FO's bid up to Group 2 aircraft as soon as possible after their first year seat lock.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands