Apparently ASA has enough pilots

Reply Subscribe

Page 3 of 3

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

04-23-2008 | 01:39 AM

#21

surreal1221

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 903

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaribPilot

"ASA will use four digit flight numbers in order to comply with ICAO ATC international and domestic flight rules"

Taken from the Informational bulletin.

I think his question was more why we are using Acey now as opposed to Chandler from a year ago.

Unfortunately, I can not find the document that stated "why" there was the switch.

It's a long story.

04-23-2008 | 05:22 AM

#22

atlmsl

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 413

Likes: 0

From: ATL

Quote:

Originally Posted by surreal1221

I think his question was more why we are using Acey now as opposed to Chandler from a year ago.

Unfortunately, I can not find the document that stated "why" there was the switch.

It's a long story.

He was referring to us using 4 digits now. Up until last week we were "Acey 392." Now we are "Acey 4392" in order to comply with ICAO format. We're all still messing it up... patience, my friends, we'll get it right.

04-23-2008 | 05:38 AM

#23

johnpeace

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 139

Likes: 0

From: ASA FO

Quote:

so im pretty sure interviewing is really not worth it right now, they have to be done hiring for awhile. shoulda jumped on board awhile ago.

1. Interviewing anywhere is great experience for those of us climbing the career ladder.

2. ASA has an excellent interview process.

3. There's an ENORMOUS amount of volatility and uncertainty in the industry right now. Numerous scenarios could possibly play out that would result in ASA running classes again.

I'd say it's definitely worth it to interview. Just continue to look for work elsewhere afterwards.