|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 373772)
Do you think CAL will try to leverage scope relaxation negations with the treat of a merger?
E.G. "We need larger RJ's or we'll be forced to merge." Besides, mergers do not have to be mutually agreed upon...ie hostile takeover. |
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 373535)
I don't know about that, you can expect branded to be dumped asap followed by the delta pro-rate with jets deal, as both are the reason xjt is bleeding so much cash. They would probably get rid of about 40 airplanes when all is said and done and you know what that means.
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
(Post 373586)
Who says xjt would be operating those flights?
|
Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
(Post 373774)
Not likely unless you are talking about 190s, what airline wants more 50 seaters?
|
Originally Posted by blastoff
(Post 374848)
Embraer has already told XJT that they would prefer not re-starting the 145, and would rather XJT convert those options to the E-Jet line.
However, they're still obligated to whether they like it or not.;) But that's what I heard when I was still around as well. |
Originally Posted by Nevets
(Post 374783)
The XJT's scope clause.
|
do you have a source?
|
Originally Posted by dba74
(Post 374941)
do you have a source?
This proposal is also conditioned upon ExpressJet obtaining a clarification and/or amendment, satisfactory to us, to the collective bargaining agreement (the “CBA”) between ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. and the pilots in the service of ExpressJet Airlines, as represented by the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”), dated December 1, 2004. First, we need clarification that nothing in the CBA (including, but not limited to, Section 1.D.3) would obligate us to merge the operations of ExpressJet Airlines with those of any or all of our currently-owned airline subsidiaries, or any airline subsidiaries we may acquire in the future, or otherwise apply to us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates (other than ExpressJet and its subsidiaries). Secondly, we need the agreement of ALPA that the certain undated letter among ExpressJet, XJT Holdings, Inc., ALPA and the ExpressJet MEC, appended as pages 223 through 226 of the CBA, shall be revoked and deemed null and void, prior to the conclusion of the acquisition. |
That is what XJT is worried about. We don't want Skywest to use OUR XR options that are convertible to E-Jets and purchase them for the Skywest pilot to fly. I'm not worried about our pay and work rules being tampered with. I'm worried that any and all new flying will always go to the Skywest certificate. Any ASA guys want to chime in? How did it work you ya'll were bought?
|
Originally Posted by Roper92
(Post 374976)
That is what XJT is worried about. We don't want Skywest to use OUR XR options that are convertible to E-Jets and purchase them for the Skywest pilot to fly. I'm not worried about our pay and work rules being tampered with. I'm worried that any and all new flying will always go to the Skywest certificate. Any ASA guys want to chime in? How did it work you ya'll were bought?
That is correct, its been the case that skywest airlines is the only one that is positioned for growth due to our competative costs. I am also sure it will be the case for all future flying. However asa has grown by at least 10 airlplanes in the past 3 years. But at this point xjt pilots should just be more worried about keeping their jobs and not wanting to grow their airline. |
Originally Posted by Roper92
(Post 374976)
That is what XJT is worried about. We don't want Skywest to use OUR XR options that are convertible to E-Jets and purchase them for the Skywest pilot to fly. I'm not worried about our pay and work rules being tampered with. I'm worried that any and all new flying will always go to the Skywest certificate. Any ASA guys want to chime in? How did it work you ya'll were bought?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands