Pinnacle Copy of Arbitration
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
http://www.aviationtoday.com/ran/cat...ial/21627.html
not warren buffet. Its public info and i know a saab ca. Colgan lost 5 million in first quarter. i hope everything you say is true but i have a feeling a lot of people at the regional feed level are going to be shocked when the time for cuts comes around. bankruptcy courts can throw contracts out the window pretty quickly. Why are the beech 19's going away? Eagle is getting rid of saabs and i would expect others to follow suit.
not warren buffet. Its public info and i know a saab ca. Colgan lost 5 million in first quarter. i hope everything you say is true but i have a feeling a lot of people at the regional feed level are going to be shocked when the time for cuts comes around. bankruptcy courts can throw contracts out the window pretty quickly. Why are the beech 19's going away? Eagle is getting rid of saabs and i would expect others to follow suit.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
"To the extent that we cannot significantly reduce Colgan's losses, we will make plans to reduce or eliminate the pro-rate operations at Colgan. These actions could result in significant one-time costs associated with exiting the fleet. Such steps would involve removing leased aircraft from service and returning them to third party lessors in advance of lease expirations, removing and remarketing owned Saab aircraft, selling or disposing of Colgan's inventory of Saab parts, and potentially furloughing employees. These actions could result in future write-downs of the carrying value of our tangible assets. In addition, we will continue to evaluate Colgan's intangible assets for impairment. As of March 31, 2008, Colgan's intangible assets had a balance of approximately $16 million." Pinnacle's 10-Q May 08
sorry if i ruffled your feathers but i was just responding to a "your going to be out of a job" with factual info.
sorry if i ruffled your feathers but i was just responding to a "your going to be out of a job" with factual info.
#33
#34
Banned
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
No matter how you spin it. XJT pilots were replaced at EWR with pilots who make 80% of our wages to fly 48% more seats. That is shameful.
#35
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: 737 Left
Colgan does nothing BUT undercut! Having the rates thrown on you? its called not flying the damn airplane.
this guy is a nutter. this guy posted in threads where you said "well colgan served me just fine. i am a 757 fo at CAL now" and then you posted about having a cal interview a couple weeks later. you can support your alma mater all you want but dont pull stuff out your rear. you are completely discredited in my book.
this guy is a nutter. this guy posted in threads where you said "well colgan served me just fine. i am a 757 fo at CAL now" and then you posted about having a cal interview a couple weeks later. you can support your alma mater all you want but dont pull stuff out your rear. you are completely discredited in my book.
I interviewed at CAL...told that if hired we would expect a 757 class. Got called a week and half later. When I got my letter it was the 737. I didn't complain.
You are completely losing it.
I like how you can make a statement like that and not back it up with facts and dates. You're a lunatic.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: 737 Left
Fact is Colgan will vote ALPA this year and work towards making the working conditions better for themselves.
I voted YES last year and all that did should be commended- not call scabs or undercutters.
I voted YES last year and all that did should be commended- not call scabs or undercutters.
#38
http://www.aviationtoday.com/ran/cat...ial/21627.html
Its public info and i know a saab ca.
Its public info and i know a saab ca.
#39
I like how you don't include the flying you do. I got a better one for you: All flying under a mainline's name should be flown by mainline pilots.
No matter how you spin it. XJT pilots were replaced at EWR with pilots who make 80% of our wages to fly 48% more seats. That is shameful.
No matter how you spin it. XJT pilots were replaced at EWR with pilots who make 80% of our wages to fly 48% more seats. That is shameful.
And higher frequency at some airports lead to taxis that take as long as the flights. Telling the customer he can leave every hour but he will spend a whole lot longer in the plane because of it is IMHO bad service. But hey, what do I know: in 98 COEX wouldn't even interview me because I didn't have 1500 hours, and EJT last advertised 600/100.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Past V1
Mergers and Acquisitions
92
04-03-2008 12:19 PM



