![]() |
Originally Posted by FOblondie
(Post 412090)
Yes and you're always very mysterious as to how you know that. I want to see it for myself. Plus that number was awhile ago and since a lot of those guys were still in training I'm assuming quite a few aren't there anymore.
|
Originally Posted by maveric311
(Post 412158)
Everyone that started class has finished or is in the process of finishing. They havent sent anyone home from the school house to my knowledge.
Besides a couple CA upgrades, nobody has gone home...all the new-hires are still here. |
...and all our checkrides are finsihed by friday...
|
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 411908)
Looks like TSA/CHQ will be reduced as well.
|
Originally Posted by SharkyBN584
(Post 412443)
I would be surprised if AA took any flying away from CHQ. Contractually, I don't think they can reduce us a significant amount unless they go into bankruptcy.
|
Originally Posted by maveric311
(Post 412158)
Everyone that started class has finished or is in the process of finishing. They havent sent anyone home from the school house to my knowledge.
Furloughs may happen so if you are towards the bottom, keep a backup plan in place but in the mean time you will have an excellent opportunity to build time and experience with some very good Captains. IF those furloughs happen, it probibly won't be for months and by then they may not be necessary at all. I know its difficult but keep focused and do what you do best. Good luck all |
This may have already been mentioned....
However, first off, what is good for one isn't good for another. We at TSA are screwed with potentially 100 pilots furloughed because of this, while the Eagle guys are happy. No hard feelings at all to the Eagle guys, its just the way life works and we'll suck it up. However, we operate 16 AA airplanes, with 10 gone soon, our AA operation will be about the same as our Airways operation. However, this may???? be a good thing because it loosens AA's grip on us as regards that 50 seat scope clause. Perhaps if we ditch AA flying, we can begin to get 70 seaters on the TSA side, merge seniority lists with GoJet (that will be a big cluster to arrange) and operate primarily as a United feeder. But, then again, if United goes TU, we're done. |
Originally Posted by bryris
(Post 412495)
However, first off, what is good for one isn't good for another. We at TSA are screwed with potentially 100 pilots furloughed because of this, while the Eagle guys are happy.
|
Originally Posted by bryris
(Post 412495)
Perhaps if we ditch AA flying, we can begin to get 70 seaters on the TSA side
Sure it was a bad pay scale and the Go Jet guys stayed in their "70 seaters", but a 3 year extention to secure future flying was worth it (in my oppinion). Hope my friends at TSA are able to ride this one out...good luck guys. :cool: |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 412465)
Does anyone have info on how the CHQ contract works? I would imagine AA is locked into an agreement and wouldnt be able to just cut them out?
The common feeling is that both parties will part ways when the contract is up in 2013ish. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands