Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
UAL MEC Response to UAX letter >

UAL MEC Response to UAX letter

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

UAL MEC Response to UAX letter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2008, 10:31 PM
  #1  
Da Man
Thread Starter
 
WatchThis!'s Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: DC-10 F/O
Posts: 436
Default UAL MEC Response to UAX letter


MEC Jumpseat Comm. Reminder on UAX Carrier Jumpseat Situation


MEC Jumpseat Committee Chairman Captain Bob Spadea would like to advise all United pilots that commute on our UAX carriers that you may be receiving a letter from the respective carrier's Jumpseat Committee the next time you request a jumpseat from the captain. In summary, this letter issues an ultimatum to the UALMEC and the Jumpseat Committee to resolve several jumpseat issues pertaining to computer programming software that sorts UAX pilots for jumpseats on UAX flights. According to the letter, if these problems are not resolved by July 31, 2008, jumpseats will be DENIED to United pilots.

The aforementioned problems have been identified and cannot be easily resolved due to the magnitude of the UAX operation. Some of these issues require software rewrites, manpower assignments and additional funding. In a series of face-to-face meetings between your Jumpseat Committee and the UAX jumpseat members, the parties were made fully aware of the complexity of these problems. They were also made aware of the limited resources, limited manpower and funds needed to correct these problems.

Your Jumpseat Committee is working with UA flight operations and UA management to inquire as to what alternatives can be implemented in resolving these problems. Keep in mind that we will not allow any carrier to use the jumpseat as a bargaining chip or leverage in meeting demands or forcing policies. In issuing this ultimatum to our MEC, these UAX carriers are 100% responsible for any consequences that may result from their course of action.

The UALMEC Jumpseat Committee will update you as appropriate.
WatchThis! is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 10:55 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: EMB FO
Posts: 38
Default

This

Is

United!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mossy is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 10:55 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: EMB FO
Posts: 38
Default

it wouldn't let me do all caps. doesn't quite have the same emphasis....
Mossy is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 11:08 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJ Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 299
Default

I just don't get it. Times are tough enough without infighting. Cant we get along and help each other out? I for one have a good deal of respect for the UAL pilot group. They will have a spot in my jumpseat regardless of the outcome of this.
ERJ Driver is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 12:16 AM
  #5  
La Familia Delta
 
ghilis101's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 2,467
Default

well said ERJ driver. that original UAX letter about denying jumpseats was the worst possible way to try to handle this situation. yes its a problem but your average commuting UAL pilot did not intentionally rig the software. and UAX commuters should be upset but the frustration was directed against the wrong people.
ghilis101 is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 05:13 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustAMushroom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Default

But what would you have us do? It has been 2 YEARS! When is enough enough? It was a matter of key strokes that put UAL pilots at the head of a jumpseat list on Express carriers.

It really boils down to two choices.
1) UAL pilots get priority over the UAX jumpseats by the very fact the tail has a United logo on it.
2) UAL pilots get SECOND priority over the jumpseat right AFTER the pilots of that one Express carrier.

Depending on how you answer this question will determine how you think about this action. No one wants this pi$$ing match, but it's never the wrong time to do the right thing.
Finally, the UAL MEC is starting to listen. The UAX letter, however poorly timed, is the only way to right a wrong.
JustAMushroom is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 05:52 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,082
Default

novel idea... how about the captains take control. if another pilot from your company shows up and needs the jumpseat fine tell the united pilot sorry the seat is already occupied. end of discussion. as captain it's YOUR seat to assign.
Avroman is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 06:06 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman View Post
novel idea... how about the captains take control. if another pilot from your company shows up and needs the jumpseat fine tell the united pilot sorry the seat is already occupied. end of discussion. as captain it's YOUR seat to assign.
waaaaay to easy and boring
mooney is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 06:22 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by WatchThis! View Post
MEC Jumpseat Comm. Reminder on UAX Carrier Jumpseat Situation

MEC Jumpseat Committee Chairman Captain Bob Spadea would like to advise all United pilots that commute on our UAX carriers that you may be receiving a letter from the respective carrier's Jumpseat Committee the next time you request a jumpseat from the captain. In summary, this letter issues an ultimatum to the UALMEC and the Jumpseat Committee to resolve several jumpseat issues pertaining to computer programming software that sorts UAX pilots for jumpseats on UAX flights. According to the letter, if these problems are not resolved by July 31, 2008, jumpseats will be DENIED to United pilots.

The aforementioned problems have been identified and cannot be easily resolved due to the magnitude of the UAX operation. Some of these issues require software rewrites, manpower assignments and additional funding. In a series of face-to-face meetings between your Jumpseat Committee and the UAX jumpseat members, the parties were made fully aware of the complexity of these problems. They were also made aware of the limited resources, limited manpower and funds needed to correct these problems.

Your Jumpseat Committee is working with UA flight operations and UA management to inquire as to what alternatives can be implemented in resolving these problems. Keep in mind that we will not allow any carrier to use the jumpseat as a bargaining chip or leverage in meeting demands or forcing policies. In issuing this ultimatum to our MEC, these UAX carriers are 100% responsible for any consequences that may result from their course of action.

The UALMEC Jumpseat Committee will update you as appropriate.
Something tells me that if the computer glitch was causing UAL mainline guys to get bumped off their own mainline jumpseats in favor of a regional pilot they would have raised holy he[[ and fixed it long ago. However, since the glitch benefits them they probably weren't real motivated to address it. Now maybe they will. Seems to me UALPA has shown no leadership on this issue.
Deez340 is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 06:31 AM
  #10  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

How can the magnitude of the UAX operaton be any bigger or more complicated than the DCI operation at DAL. I guess DT got lucky and programmed the computers the right way the first time.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Razor
Mergers and Acquisitions
23
04-22-2008 04:04 PM
BigGuns
Mergers and Acquisitions
50
04-19-2008 05:22 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices