Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Delta Terminates Xjt......sept 1, 2008 >

Delta Terminates Xjt......sept 1, 2008

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Delta Terminates Xjt......sept 1, 2008

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2008, 01:12 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by furloughman View Post
I'm glad we are all singing from the same sheet of music regarding scope. Now let's all unify together to realign the industry for the future. First of all, ALPA needs to get their $%&T together. We as pilots cannot become selfish. We have to think long term.
Agreed, but there is a little problem that many suffer from when being in a unIon.

Nuff' said.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:47 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WAVIT Inbound's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Captain
Posts: 466
Default

So if it came down to 2 or 3 regionals who's to say it is the wholly owned who survive? Actually it would be much cheaper to just get rid of the wholly owned's because there would be no expensive contract to try and get rid of. Plus if the wave of the future really is to have regionals share more of the fuel costs then that would be possible with contracts at a contract carrier. At a wholly owned the major partner is footing the entire fuel bill no matter what.

Just playing devil's advocate here. I think we all want to think we know will happen. But really none of us do.
WAVIT Inbound is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:56 PM
  #103  
Retired
 
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: whale wrangler
Posts: 3,527
Default

Originally Posted by furloughman View Post
I'm glad we are all singing from the same sheet of music regarding scope. Now let's all unify together to realign the industry for the future. First of all, ALPA needs to get their $%&T together. We as pilots cannot become selfish. We have to think long term.
If you guys want to survive the next 2-3 years ,the long term thinking part would be the way to go because there will be lots of changes coming to this industry and the quote brother you aint see nothin yet comes to mind and as far as ALPA they schould have gotten their act together years ago.


Back to the drink cart .
DYNASTY HVY is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 03:04 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by WAVIT Inbound View Post
So if it came down to 2 or 3 regionals who's to say it is the wholly owned who survive? Actually it would be much cheaper to just get rid of the wholly owned's because there would be no expensive contract to try and get rid of. Plus if the wave of the future really is to have regionals share more of the fuel costs then that would be possible with contracts at a contract carrier. At a wholly owned the major partner is footing the entire fuel bill no matter what.

Just playing devil's advocate here. I think we all want to think we know will happen. But really none of us do.
If you read my post, then you would have realized basically I was saying the samething. No one knows who will be one of those 2 or 3 regionals left standing. Samething applies to Skywest and Republic. That's my point. Wholly owned or not we are the last ones to find out. It's all pure speculation and everyone needs to ride it out with patience.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 08:00 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaPaySoon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Stage Left
Posts: 366
Default

Originally Posted by WAVIT Inbound View Post
So if it came down to 2 or 3 regionals who's to say it is the wholly owned who survive? Actually it would be much cheaper to just get rid of the wholly owned's because there would be no expensive contract to try and get rid of. Plus if the wave of the future really is to have regionals share more of the fuel costs then that would be possible with contracts at a contract carrier. At a wholly owned the major partner is footing the entire fuel bill no matter what.

Just playing devil's advocate here. I think we all want to think we know will happen. But really none of us do.

Wholly owned airlines are much easier to get performance numbers where they want as they can manipulate the variables more. Delta isn't dumping Mesa or "testing" Pinnacle without cause. There is a boatload more to make on owning your own vs. saving on a low ball contract. Look at Mesa, JO has low ball contract after low ball contract and he can't make it work because of the limitations. He was perfect for the legacy's pre-bankruptcy and is being hung out to dry post. That was a pre-bankruptcy mentality that doesn't work when bankruptcy isn't an option for management to "get theirs" after they already did. Now that the bankruptcy "boom" is over for most, they can't go to the BOD and say, "I'm going to go into bankruptcy and save the company XXX a year when I get to void labor contracts. I just want 15% of those savings." There is more incentive for management to get their money through their stock options (as it was before the bankruptcy "swoon, scandle, thievery (pick your word of choice). The only way they can do that now is show growth, happy labor groups and performance. That's what investors want to see.

IMHO, I would not be surprised to see the airlines that fly different uniforms for different airlines get left behind in the not to distant future. They don't offer enough ROI on the balance sheet for investors that want to see the stock price go up and that's how management that's gone through bankruptcy already will get "paid".
DeltaPaySoon is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:13 PM
  #106  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by WAVIT Inbound View Post
So if it came down to 2 or 3 regionals who's to say it is the wholly owned who survive? Actually it would be much cheaper to just get rid of the wholly owned's because there would be no expensive contract to try and get rid of. Plus if the wave of the future really is to have regionals share more of the fuel costs then that would be possible with contracts at a contract carrier. At a wholly owned the major partner is footing the entire fuel bill no matter what.

Just playing devil's advocate here. I think we all want to think we know will happen. But really none of us do.
The mainline carriers are getting tired of guaranteeing profits and paying the fuel bills for the regionals. I think the reason you are seeing DAL and NWA with the wholly owned regionals is because that way they can keep the money in house and have the freedom to adjust as necessary instead of getting locked in to contracts with outside subcontractors. The days of the mainline carriers footing the fuel bills are going to quickly come to an end and there arent many regionals that can afford to cover the fuel costs now a days. Just an observation.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:19 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WAVIT Inbound's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Captain
Posts: 466
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
The mainline carriers are getting tired of guaranteeing profits and paying the fuel bills for the regionals. I think the reason you are seeing DAL and NWA with the wholly owned regionals is because that way they can keep the money in house and have the freedom to adjust as necessary instead of getting locked in to contracts with outside subcontractors. The days of the mainline carriers footing the fuel bills are going to quickly come to an end and there arent many regionals that can afford to cover the fuel costs now a days. Just an observation.
Please explain to me how a mainline carrier would not be footing the bill at a wholly owned carrier? They would foot ALL of the bill. However I do think a contract at a contacted carrier can be written to at least SHARE some fuel cost. While no regional can foot the entire bill either, they could relieve some of the pressure.

There are a million ways to spin this in favor of either a wholly owned or a contract carrier. We will just have to see what happens. IMO there are operational costs included with a wholly owned that are not at a contracted carrier. One thing is for certain. At a wholly owned mainline is paying 100% of the cost of everything.
WAVIT Inbound is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:31 PM
  #108  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by WAVIT Inbound View Post
Please explain to me how a mainline carrier would not be footing the bill at a wholly owned carrier? They would foot ALL of the bill. However I do think a contract at a contacted carrier can be written to at least SHARE some fuel cost. While no regional can foot the entire bill either, they could relieve some of the pressure.

There are a million ways to spin this in favor of either a wholly owned or a contract carrier. We will just have to see what happens. IMO there are operational costs included with a wholly owned that are not at a contracted carrier. One thing is for certain. At a wholly owned mainline is paying 100% of the cost of everything.
They do pay 100% of the fuel bill but dont have to guarantee profits to a carrier not owned by themselves. Also they have the freedom to adjust the flying as they see fit instead of being restrained by a contract with an outside company. For instance Skywest and Mesa Suing DAL over their contracts.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 11:17 PM
  #109  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Media Q&A

Why is Delta and ExpressJet ending their agreement?
Delta and ExpressJet have made this mutual decision because it benefits two airlines with a common goal to reduce operating expenses related to the sharp increase in fuel cost.

How long has ExpressJet operated as a Delta Connection carrier?
ExpressJet began operations as a Delta Connection carrier in June 2007.

How many and what type of aircraft does ExpressJet fly for Delta?
ExpressJet flies 23 145-ERJ, 50-seat aircraft.

How many daily flights and destinations does ExpressJet currently fly for Delta? How many will Delta Connection partners fly after Sept. 1?
ExpressJet flies 100 daily flights to approximately 30 destinations. After Sept. 1, Delta Connection will fly approximately 2500 daily flights to over 230 destinations.

What new routes reductions are included with this announcement?
All routes either originate or terminate in Los Angeles including: Boise, Idaho; Denver, Colorado; Eugene, Oregon; Spokane, Washington; Oakland, California; Portland, Oregon; Phoenix, Arizona; Reno Nevada; Seattle Washington; San Francisco, California; San Jose, California; Sacramento, California and Tulsa, Oklahoma. Total # Departures 31.5 day per day

Are there any current ExpressJet markets being backfilled?
Yes. While the ExpressJet routes originating in Los Angeles are being cancelled, flights originating from Salt Lake City will be replaced with 50-seat regional jets operated by other Delta Connection carriers.

Will there be any interruption in service for flights scheduled to continue beyond Sept. 1?
No. Any service flown by ExpressJet that is scheduled to continue beyond Sept. 1 will be operated by another Delta Connection carrier.

How will customers be impacted by this decision?
We expect minimal impact to customers and, Delta will work to ensure that alternate transportation options are arranged as quickly as possible.

Does this have anything to do with the NWA merger, or the pending Freedom and Pinnacle contract termination announcements?
No. This mutual decision has been made because it benefits two airlines with a common goal to reduce operating expenses related to the sharp increase in fuel cost.

What is Delta’s current situation with Mesa (Freedom) and Pinnacle?
Mesa – We disagree with the court’s decision and have filed an appeal.
Pinnacle - We have notified them of our election to terminate the Delta Connection contract. We’re in discussions to see whether the situation can be resolved through mutual agreement.

Are the ExpressJet changes part of the recently announced 13 percent domestic decrease and 60-70 regional jet reduction?
Yes. But because we have not announced the specific changes in the LAX and SLC markets we will not break them out at this time.

Will any Delta employees’ jobs be impacted by this announcement?
There will be no involuntary reductions in headcount as a result of this announcement. We will continue to review our staffing needs for our operations and allow reductions through normal attrition.
Nevets is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 11:23 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 462
Default

i hate seeing xjet going through all of these troubles. hope they find some1 to fly those planes

Last edited by threegreen; 07-05-2008 at 11:30 PM.
threegreen is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
wannabepilot
Flight Schools and Training
34
07-07-2008 12:15 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-22-2005 10:12 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices