Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Mesa Emergency Landing in CHO >

Mesa Emergency Landing in CHO

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mesa Emergency Landing in CHO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2008 | 10:13 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 9
Default

Thanks Release! Now we can quit armchair-quarterbacking LoL
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 04:28 AM
  #22  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by Releasemaster
Here are the deets on the ROA-CHO flight: Flight departed ROA for IAD, the gear would not retract and a significant fuel burn was added. On approach into IAD the non existant visability would not allow for landing, so the flight diverted and due to the gear extended burn factor, CHO was left as the only suitable alternate. IAD ATC declared the emergancy for the flight and had crash and rescue waiting at CHO.

The captain was very shaken up by the entire gear issue and bad weather conditions at IAD.
Is this fairly standard procedure that the aircraft would leave ROA with a gear problem and continue to IAD with known weather?

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 04:33 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Is this fairly standard procedure that the aircraft would leave ROA with a gear problem and continue to IAD with known weather?

USMCFLYR

Well they probably didn't know they had a gear problem until they took off and tried to retract it, but on a 25 minute flight like that, I too would rather continue to destination (back to a hub) where there are better crash, fire and rescue options and a maintenance base with of course longer runways that aren't on the side of a mountain.

Then again, you have the weather issue. I wasn't there so I can't say "Oh I'd do this, and then this..." blah blah blah.

I know our ORD-SBN flight that had the gear problem returned to ORD since it's such a short flight and they had to burn the gas off.

Does that help?
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 04:46 AM
  #24  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by DublinFlyer
Well they probably didn't know they had a gear problem until they took off and tried to retract it, but on a 25 minute flight like that, I too would rather continue to destination (back to a hub) where there are better crash, fire and rescue options and a maintenance base with of course longer runways that aren't on the side of a mountain.

Then again, you have the weather issue. I wasn't there so I can't say "Oh I'd do this, and then this..." blah blah blah.

I know our ORD-SBN flight that had the gear problem returned to ORD since it's such a short flight and they had to burn the gas off.

Does that help?
I actually thought about this after I posted the question. I'm used to having that ability to adjust your gross weight if needed and I forget that you would have to possibly burn some fuel off in any case.
Thanks.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 04:50 AM
  #25  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by .

So what happened? They flew to ROA, couldn't get in, and then went straight to CHO? [B
Or did they try more approaches into ROA[/B]? At least they all got on the ground safely!

Go arounds are not an option in Roanoke.
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 05:34 AM
  #26  
flyguyniner11's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: A320 CA
Default

The plane is still sitting in cho as far as I know too. It wa still there yesterday afternoon
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 07:31 AM
  #27  
captain152's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
Would you have immediately diverted at 2000 lbs FOB??

I know that you are not typically argumentative, so if you are going to question my crew's judgement, please be a bit more tactful?
Little defensive there? If you didn't want to be questioned on it, then why'd you say it on here? I don't think anyone is here to be argumentative (at least not in this thread).
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 07:37 AM
  #28  
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: retired
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
Go arounds are not an option in Roanoke.
That's right, just ask captain "tail dragger."
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 08:18 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: CL-65 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
Go arounds are not an option in Roanoke.

Umm, I think they are. I'm not about to get my lazy butt out of bed to go get my flight bag, but I'm pretty sure I brief a missed approach/go around every time I go in there, because it says it right on the Jepp chart.
Reply
Old 12-22-2008 | 08:25 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
Go arounds are not an option in Roanoke.
121 Ops always have an "out" or three.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
5
12-18-2008 06:06 AM
flycrj200
Regional
14
12-06-2008 10:23 AM
robbreid
Corporate
1
12-01-2008 12:50 PM
RedBaron007
Regional
18
11-16-2008 07:56 PM
romeoKC10FE
Kalitta Companies
19
08-30-2008 11:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices