Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
New safety checks for the Bombardier CRJ >

New safety checks for the Bombardier CRJ

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

New safety checks for the Bombardier CRJ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2008 | 03:21 PM
  #11  
flyandive's Avatar
Airport Hobo
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DublinFlyer
I've never heard about that system before. So what's the point of that system anyways? Does it just prevent one flap from going down farther than the other? I've only heard of the flaps just getting stuck down in one position or not coming down at all. I should probably read more into this, and become more familiar with some previous situations that have happened. I probably sound like an idiot.
Exactly, but more specifically one side of a flap panel coming down faster than the other side. In other words the whole panel twisting. The idea is that it stops them in a certain position before they twist.

If it gets any kind of an abnormality it stops the motor and engages the brakes thereby holding it in position against the slipstream.
Reply
Old 12-23-2008 | 03:49 PM
  #12  
higney85's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 8
From: Bus driver
Default

I'm waiting for an AD prohibiting the use of flaps unless in the case of an emergency.
Reply
Old 12-23-2008 | 04:14 PM
  #13  
CRJPlt's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: 320B
Default

Originally Posted by DublinFlyer
I've never had a problem with flaps (with the exception of flaps/slats halfspeed on the 700). Is this a design problem, or a flap motor problem? I fly the bugger and I still don't know all the details.

Wow, I'd say your pretty lucky. I flew the CRJ for two and a half months and somehow managed to have TWO flap failures and these were in my first week of IOE!
Reply
Old 12-23-2008 | 05:21 PM
  #14  
flyandive's Avatar
Airport Hobo
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CRJPlt
Wow, I'd say your pretty lucky. I flew the CRJ for two and a half months and somehow managed to have TWO flap failures and these were in my first week of IOE!
LOL, yeah that sounds more like it. I had one going into JFK (used all of 31L for landing), then I switched to the 700/900 which doesn't have these problems. Just a much better design from a pilot's perspective.
Spending time with some of our mechanics, however, they had the exact opposite perspective except when it came to the flaps (pain in the arse to repair). They preferred working on the 100/200. They said when the 50 seater was broken, you knew it was broken. The 700/900 was just one big electrical glitch waiting to happen.

I have to agree with Dubflyer though, the CRJ is a fun airplane, you do learn to expect the unexpected!. Never flown the jungle jet though so I can't comment on it.
Reply
Old 12-23-2008 | 07:33 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: B777
Default

I have thousands of hours in both (sorry to say) and the ERJ was a better airplane. We didn't think that at the time, when the erj first came out we suspected it was a throwaway pos, but we were wrong
Reply
Old 12-23-2008 | 08:22 PM
  #16  
weasil's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

I had my first flap failure in the 200 this past weekend. Not much fun landing in blowing snow with wind gusts to 37kts, going 170 kts over the fence. Used up every inch of that runway (8000'). Got to the gate to find out we were the second RJ that day to have a flap failure at that airport and the day was young.
Reply
Old 12-23-2008 | 08:59 PM
  #17  
flyandive's Avatar
Airport Hobo
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by the turtle
I have thousands of hours in both (sorry to say) and the ERJ was a better airplane. We didn't think that at the time, when the erj first came out we suspected it was a throwaway pos, but we were wrong
Based on what I have heard I would agree for the 50 seater. Not so sure for the CRJ-700/900 vs. the E-170/190, but whatever, we ARE NOT turning this in to a Jungle Jet vs Tundra Jet fight!
Reply
Old 12-23-2008 | 10:34 PM
  #18  
Blkflyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Cessna 152 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by flyandive
Based on what I have heard I would agree for the 50 seater. Not so sure for the CRJ-700/900 vs. the E-170/190, but whatever, we ARE NOT turning this in to a Jungle Jet vs Tundra Jet fight!
Honestly the Airplane that pays the most while giving you the most time off is the best
Reply
Old 12-24-2008 | 02:16 AM
  #19  
UpThere's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Looking out the window
Default

Originally Posted by Blkflyer
Honestly the Airplane that pays the most while giving you the most time off is the best
Agreed, 100%!!!!
Reply
Old 12-24-2008 | 04:29 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,847
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Blkflyer
Honestly the Airplane that pays the most while giving you the most time off is the best
That would most certainly be the CRJ for me...but that doesn't mean I can't fantasize about being at the controls of an ERJ again
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
Regional
1
03-16-2005 11:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices