Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
CRJ1000 Sighting in ICT... >

CRJ1000 Sighting in ICT...

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

CRJ1000 Sighting in ICT...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2009 | 06:21 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 12
From: Maddog FO
Default

Does anyone know the range of this new CRJ-1000? I looked on the Bombardier website but the range maps only showed the range for the -700 and (I love it when people call it this the -9.

The DC-9 is a long RJ too yes, however, it's a little beefier with stronger engines and MUCH MUCH MUCH higher paid pilots up front.

But you already know that

Last edited by Roper92; 02-04-2009 at 06:21 AM. Reason: Recgonition of dojet
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 07:34 PM
  #22  
ebl14's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 933
Likes: 79
From: 73N
Default

The CRJ-900 looks stupid as it is, this thing is getting to be re*******diclous. What a goofy looking plane, I bet the guys at mainline will refuse to fly it leaving it to the regionals to scalp what is left of this industry. You heard it here first.
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 09:03 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by FL450
Lear and bombardier does do all their flight testing here and the cosswinds here aren't that bad. Bombardier has a position on their website or at least they did for Senior test pilot. I think all you needed was a type rating in at least one of their products which obviously you should qualify. Also check out Hawker Beech Craft they do a lot of testing as well out of ICT and beech field.

Best of luck

FL450
Hi everyone,

I am originally from Wichita and in regards to the orginal quesiton....when Bombardier purchased the LearJet manufacturing facility in 1990 they also started at flight-test facility there too. It exists for the entire Bombardier Aerospace product line. Over the years I have seen all of the CRJ series, Q400, 415 fire-bomber, Challenger 300, etc, out flying around Wichita. Now that I think about it, I remember being home from college on the summer day in 1993 when one of the original CRJ test aircraft went down west of town, unfortunately taking several lives. Anyway, it is/was the third largest civilian flight test center in the world (after Boeing and Airbus).

In regards to the other manufactures in the area...Hawker Beech and Cessna also have their production flight-test centers at BEC and ICT, respectively. However both manufactures have recently announced significant layoffs. I would be very surprised if either will be hiring any pilots for a long time. Of course those jobs require that you live in Wichita...easy for Kansans but perhaps not for the west coast folks!
Reply
Old 02-04-2009 | 10:02 PM
  #24  
FL450's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Thrill Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Roper92
Does anyone know the range of this new CRJ-1000? I looked on the Bombardier website but the range maps only showed the range for the -700 and (I love it when people call it this the -9.

The DC-9 is a long RJ too yes, however, it's a little beefier with stronger engines and MUCH MUCH MUCH higher paid pilots up front.

But you already know that
1,610 nautical miles

The CRJ 700 still has the best range out of all the RJ series
Reply
Old 02-05-2009 | 05:14 AM
  #25  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ebl14
I bet the guys at mainline will refuse to fly it leaving it to the regionals to scalp what is left of this industry. You heard it here first.
That is a bet you will most certainly lose.
Reply
Old 02-05-2009 | 10:12 PM
  #26  
RedBaron007's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: E-190 Leftist
Default

The -900 and -1000 can only be compared to a DC-9 in the number of seats each has. There's little else that can be compared, whether it's comfort, headroom, shoulder room, and cargo room, not to mention others. I find the -700 seats incredibly uncomfortable by the time I arrive in ABE from CLT. I can't even fathom how much my a$$ would hurt flying from CLT to DEN.
Reply
Old 02-08-2009 | 04:38 AM
  #27  
PiperPower's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Default Gfk

I landed right behind the CRJ1000 in GFK today. Not sure why it's up here but it is, and wow is it big. It truly does look huge... doesn't seem right. We heard it on GFK approach and they were referring to it as a CRJ900. I thought it was a Mesaba diversion until we rolled past it when we touched down. Loooooooooong.
Reply
Old 02-08-2009 | 05:11 AM
  #28  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 129
Default

Originally Posted by benXJ9er
Listen buddy. I have taken personal offense to this post. The 900 seats are actually very comfortable. even a huge man can stand in the airplane comfortably. And I ask... have ever even sat in a DC-9? The seats are just as horrible. The 9 is the new end of the line airplane. Get used to it. You're just grumpy because us 9 drivers took your flying.
Weak the flame, in your post is.
Reply
Old 02-08-2009 | 05:16 AM
  #29  
undflyboy06's Avatar
Part Time
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Chief Pilot PC-12NG
Default

Tell you one thing, any longer and it will look like the plane is taking steroids.....I mean the engines look like raisinets compared to the body.
Reply
Old 02-08-2009 | 08:54 AM
  #30  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by benXJ9er
Listen buddy. I have taken personal offense to this post. The 900 seats are actually very comfortable. even a huge man can stand in the airplane comfortably. And I ask... have ever even sat in a DC-9? The seats are just as horrible. The 9 is the new end of the line airplane. Get used to it. You're just grumpy because us 9 drivers took your flying.


FLAMEBAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tyrael37
Regional
31
10-29-2008 03:42 PM
JPilot23
Regional
23
09-04-2008 04:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices