![]() |
Originally Posted by Jetpipe22
(Post 555534)
We have never left a passenger behind for weight issues in all the time I have flown them.
|
hmm......well...
|
Originally Posted by RoughLandings
(Post 555722)
I got left behind trying to commute between MSP and IAH 4 times in 2 months for weight restrictions before the CRJ was pulled from the route...
thats cool and all buddy, but the CHQ CRJ's don't fly to MSP. |
Originally Posted by FlyJSH
(Post 555487)
What's an APU? ;)
|
Originally Posted by Jetpipe22
(Post 555745)
thats cool and all buddy, but the CHQ CRJ's don't fly to MSP.
|
Originally Posted by flyboyzz1
(Post 555702)
what was he going to tell you...of course he was going to say he liked you guys.
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 555872)
He was being honest.
Jetpipe, they did have to pull that plane from some of those type routes. It's not a stab at your company or your pilots. The E-145XR simply out performs the CRJ-200.. |
Originally Posted by Jetpipe22
(Post 555745)
thats cool and all buddy, but the CHQ CRJ's don't fly to MSP.
|
Originally Posted by Roper92
(Post 555904)
Yeah CEOs are notorious for being honest.
Jetpipe, they did have to pull that plane from some of those type routes. It's not a stab at your company or your pilots. The E-145XR simply out performs the CRJ-200.. CAL now flies MSP mainline which it always should have been. The planes are full when I take them. They could have put an LR2 on it but I guess finally wised up. Next step they need to put a 73 on IAH-STL. Always full. |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 555934)
I find it funny I'm the only one who saw the guy and spoke with him yet others keep trying to tell me how it went down lol.
CAL now flies MSP mainline which it always should have been. The planes are full when I take them. They could have put an LR2 on it but I guess finally wised up. Next step they need to put a 73 on IAH-STL. Always full. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands