Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Ask the Pilot-Colgan 3407 >

Ask the Pilot-Colgan 3407

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Ask the Pilot-Colgan 3407

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2009 | 07:38 AM
  #41  
Tinpusher007's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 27
From: 330 B
Default

For what its worth guys, I have flown with Mesabah and there was nothing scarey about him. In fact I had no idea that he had less time on the CRJ than I or that he was younger than me. And from what I could tell it didn't matter. I do understand the point behind the "scarey" comment, but I highly doubt that any of us would find up it scarey to upgrade that young if we were all in his shoes. Just food for thought!
Reply
Old 04-07-2009 | 07:40 AM
  #42  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 61
From: Legacy FO
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
We're adults, aren't we? I for one don't appreciate being treated as a child. After all, they are trusting those guys with multi-million dollar equipment...and then found it necessary to post a flyer like that? Silly...
You and I don't know what or if any events occured prior to warrant such a flyer. I didn't take it as being treated like a child. Remember, it is company provided housing so they can make the rules. If you don't like it, go pay for a room yourself.

I saw the flyer as the company trying to protect itself from possible future problems. The rules posted on the flyer were similar to those I had in college (even more lenient) and while in the military.
Reply
Old 04-07-2009 | 09:01 AM
  #43  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by tim123
Except when something goes wrong
I can't imagine anything going wrong on a CRJ that would put me in dire straits compared to any other more experienced pilot in the same position.

The only issues I've had so far involve the FA's that are much older than I am. If I am flying with an FO that is much older than me, a few of the older FA's tend to see the older pilot as the final authority.
Reply
Old 04-07-2009 | 10:21 AM
  #44  
TMoney's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: 717 Sidekick
Default An important step

Originally Posted by brewpilot
Ok, that was a good article. But I just have to ask, besides being a CFI and teaching students to fly, then getting enough hours. The next step is Regional airlines. That's the way it's been going right?
I think pilots are missing an important step here between CFI and regional pilot. I saw another post on here from someone saying they learned how to fly the ILS into BUF at night with icing in a twin cessna full of bank checks. That is the missing step. You will learn more from operating part 135, at night, in the weather with poor equipment...all by yourself. There is no one else to hold your hand, autopilot or other crew member.

After spending a winter flying boxes around at night in the ice/snow to tiny uncontrolled airports in a twin turboprop /A (no gps/FMS or any other fancy gizmos), flying a regional aircraft two crew, with an autopilot, heated cockpit, etc would be a trip to heaven. And I would feel much more confident flying that larger regional aircraft than the CFI who just left the C-172 to slide into the CRJ-700.

Back when all the regionals were hiring I tried to get others to come play in the cargo world but they just turned up their noses and went to their airline jobs. I feel like they missed an important step that would have really forced them to get those good decision making experiences we are all speaking of.

P.S. Those regional pilots are now coming to me looking for a job.
Reply
Old 04-07-2009 | 11:36 AM
  #45  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
You and I don't know what or if any events occured prior to warrant such a flyer. I didn't take it as being treated like a child. Remember, it is company provided housing so they can make the rules. If you don't like it, go pay for a room yourself.

I saw the flyer as the company trying to protect itself from possible future problems. The rules posted on the flyer were similar to those I had in college (even more lenient) and while in the military.
This is exactly how I viewed that list. Unfortunate but something must have happened in the past to ellict such an approach; plus who knows what lawsuits they are trying to protect themselves from with a clearly defined set of rules.

I wish it was as simple as saying that everyone there is mature and a true professional and that there is no need for such a set of rules - but using this forum and the simple set of TOS that we have and seeing how many people blatantly violate that set or rules - is anyone truly surprised? Sorry - a little bit of moderation frustration sneaked out there.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 04-07-2009 | 04:32 PM
  #46  
Jetstream 823JS's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LoudFastRules
I would just change the word "want" to "have". You MUST upgrade to pay the bills.
Yes, This is the system that the industry has set up.

We purge experienced fairly paid pilots and replace them with freshly minted newbies from PAN Am Academy and All ATP's, who are wiling to work for next to nothing, while hoping for a grab at the golden ring.

We can beat the high time vs low time argument to death, but I think everyone will agree that overall, flight experience has value.

I have flown with some very sharp low time FO's who were ready for upgrade and some who made me roll my eyes but eventually all made very capable Captains.

An FO on a regional airliner should be making 60K a year.

Last edited by Jetstream 823JS; 04-07-2009 at 07:25 PM.
Reply
Old 04-07-2009 | 07:08 PM
  #47  
Big3win's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: 717
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
I can't imagine anything going wrong on a CRJ that would put me in dire straits compared to any other more experienced pilot in the same position.

The only issues I've had so far involve the FA's that are much older than I am. If I am flying with an FO that is much older than me, a few of the older FA's tend to see the older pilot as the final authority.

Your kidding right ? What can go wrong, will go wrong.
Your crew problems will seem like a non-event. Good luck.
Reply
Old 04-07-2009 | 08:04 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Fero's
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
For what its worth guys, I have flown with Mesabah and there was nothing scarey about him. In fact I had no idea that he had less time on the CRJ than I or that he was younger than me. And from what I could tell it didn't matter. I do understand the point behind the "scarey" comment, but I highly doubt that any of us would find up it scarey to upgrade that young if we were all in his shoes. Just food for thought!
I meant no disrespect to Mesabah, in fact, I was only a year older than he when I first upgraded.

My primary concern (the thing I found scary) was with the combined level of experience. Seems that could lead to a lack of CLR (CRM). I was an LCA at the commuter I flew for so I know what it's like to fly with people with no time in type. But I had a lot of time when I did this, both total and in type.

Not too many transport category aircraft with single pilot type ratings.
Reply
Old 04-16-2009 | 12:22 PM
  #49  
Tinpusher007's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 27
From: 330 B
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice
Nice job to the writer(pilot) of the articles.

Nice to see someone in the media without their head up their .....

Once again: All commercial jets operate with a minimum of two pilots, a captain and a first officer. The latter is known colloquially as the copilot, but he or she is not an apprentice or a helping hand. First officers perform just as many takeoffs and landings as captains do, and are fully qualified to operate the plane in all regimes of flight.

The best paragraph in the articles.
Agreed but maybe if our respective companies wouldn't tell F/A's to say "Your flight is under the COMMAND of Capt. So and So and he is ASSISTED by F/O So and So" this concept wouldn't be so misunderstood.
Reply
Old 04-16-2009 | 01:44 PM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: ERJ
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
Agreed but maybe if our respective companies wouldn't tell F/A's to say "Your flight is under the COMMAND of Capt. So and So and he is ASSISTED by F/O So and So" this concept wouldn't be so misunderstood.
The flight is under the COMMAND of the captain hence PIC (Pilot in Command) versus FO SIC (Second in command). I see what point you are making but there is nothing misleading about that FA announcement. It is not like they say "The person flying the airplane is the captain assisted by the FO who is trained to sit on his hands."
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM
TPROP4ever
GoJet
322
11-24-2008 08:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices