Ask the Pilot-Colgan 3407
#31
#32
Holly sh*t, that's insane......................No wonder aviation will no longer be the safest form of travel.
Don't take it personally.........
You could be the best "stick" within a 500 mile radius, but with 1600 hours that is plain scarey. I will take experience over skill any day. Pilots skills are set early on. That said.....if you suck at 300 hrs you will most likely suck at 10,300 hours. At least the higher time guy will have enough experience to know his/her limitations.
I think it is safe to say we all have flown with lousy regional pilots and lousy Mainline guys. The only difference is the chances of two Lousy Mainline guys paired together is very slim. More hoops to jump through.The chances of two lousy Regional guys paired together is alot higher.
Yes, I have flown at the regional level. The minimum qualifications at that time were much higher. Heck I couldn't get an interview at 1589 TT. I guess things have changed............for the better?? I doubt it. I agree with many that the regional's are a place to gain experience. They are not a place to "learn to fly".
In response to the 60's the majors hired many with low time. It showed look at the past accident rates in the 70's-80's. The saving grace at the major's is most likely you will sit 5+ years in the right seat prior to upgrading.
We don't always have that luxury at the regional level.
My statements should fire up a few of you........Sorry!
Don't take it personally.........
You could be the best "stick" within a 500 mile radius, but with 1600 hours that is plain scarey. I will take experience over skill any day. Pilots skills are set early on. That said.....if you suck at 300 hrs you will most likely suck at 10,300 hours. At least the higher time guy will have enough experience to know his/her limitations.
I think it is safe to say we all have flown with lousy regional pilots and lousy Mainline guys. The only difference is the chances of two Lousy Mainline guys paired together is very slim. More hoops to jump through.The chances of two lousy Regional guys paired together is alot higher.
Yes, I have flown at the regional level. The minimum qualifications at that time were much higher. Heck I couldn't get an interview at 1589 TT. I guess things have changed............for the better?? I doubt it. I agree with many that the regional's are a place to gain experience. They are not a place to "learn to fly".
In response to the 60's the majors hired many with low time. It showed look at the past accident rates in the 70's-80's. The saving grace at the major's is most likely you will sit 5+ years in the right seat prior to upgrading.
We don't always have that luxury at the regional level.
My statements should fire up a few of you........Sorry!
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Fero's
Either way, scary
#34
each airline is different, but at RAH we can't fly "green on green" unless the FAA approves it (like when you add a new aircraft type to the fleet).
#35
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Fero's
Mesabah,
I am curious. Much has been said on this forum about experience levels. How did you feel as a min time Captain with a new hire low time FO. Do you feel any differently now than you did then?
Speaking for myself (xx,xxx hours) I am still learning.
BTW, sorry for the thread drift...
I am curious. Much has been said on this forum about experience levels. How did you feel as a min time Captain with a new hire low time FO. Do you feel any differently now than you did then?
Speaking for myself (xx,xxx hours) I am still learning.
BTW, sorry for the thread drift...
#37
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Mesabah,
I am curious. Much has been said on this forum about experience levels. How did you feel as a min time Captain with a new hire low time FO. Do you feel any differently now than you did then?
Speaking for myself (xx,xxx hours) I am still learning.
BTW, sorry for the thread drift...
I am curious. Much has been said on this forum about experience levels. How did you feel as a min time Captain with a new hire low time FO. Do you feel any differently now than you did then?
Speaking for myself (xx,xxx hours) I am still learning.
BTW, sorry for the thread drift...
Last edited by Mesabah; 04-07-2009 at 06:02 AM.
#38
I know this is going to sound strange, but since I'm so junior, I generally fly only the pop up trips with the most junior FO's. Usually this is the first trips these guys have off IOE. I rarely fly with a senior FO, so I find myself giving dual instruction most of the time. It's not an insult to the guys I fly with, it just they are so new to the job. I have learned so much by doing this.
#39
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
This is the exact problem with hiring with too low experience. A regional pilot should never need "dual instruction". Dual is given in a Cessna C-172, not a CRJ,EMB,Saab,Dash etc. When you arrive at a regional you may be green, but you should NEVER need dual. Explain that to your paying passengers in the back. I 'm sure they would rather take the train.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: 320A
They need it in airline operations, which is understandable, only a very few need actual flying help. However, it is hard to tell because the CRJ hides a pilots lack of instrument skills pretty well. In fact, I doubt a pilot would need an instrument rating to fly this thing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



