Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Regional Airline Safety questioned (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/39843-regional-airline-safety-questioned.html)

Zapata 05-10-2009 07:33 PM


Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed (Post 607912)
Hard to believe people like Cohen is the President of the Regional Pilots Association. What Cohen and the FAA refuses to acknowledge is that although low pay and low experience pilots MAY contribute to the deterioration of safety in the airline industry, the SINGLE MOST threat to safety is pilot fatigue directly caused by regional airlines managements' scheduling practices.

One, there should be no CDOs (High speeds) period. They are UNSAFE for anyone. Spoke to several CAs with close to 20,000 hours and they all said it is unsafe even after one high speed turn.

Second, airline management should not be allowed to schedule pairings with overnights less than 10 hours. 10 hour layover is in my opinion a bare MINIMUM necessary for pilots to get adequate rest.

Three, time spent waiting for passengers to deplane, writing up maintenance logs after the flight, leaving the terminal at the end of the day and waiting for the hotel shuttle van should NOT be counted as the REST period. Time for REST PERIOD should start when crews check in at the hotel for the night.

Not picking on you as I wholeheartedly agree with your post. I only point out your innocent typo due to the irony involved. He is president of the Regional Airline Association and certainly doesn't represent pilots.

boilerpilot 05-10-2009 07:59 PM


Originally Posted by Mason32 (Post 608105)
Then you and the rest of your pilots need to call fatigued everytime they schedue somethign like this. If each and every month the flight are delayed and cancelled because crew planning builds a schedule that results in too many fatigue calls.... guess what... the schedule gets changed.

And the fact that you either take that out of your sick time or don't get paid for that time? Regional FOs don't have a whole lot of choices. At a lot of places you will get at least one or two overnights like that a month, and if you only earn 2-4 sick hours per month, then you're spending all of your sick time (or much much more) on fatigue calls. What happens if you're really sick? The real issue is that when making the decision between calling in fatigued or when deciding to go to work for the day, the FO has to decide if the lost pay or lost sick time is worth what will probably result in a relatively safe and violation free day.

ImEbee 05-11-2009 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by Purpleanga (Post 607835)
I also agree that the FAA has a dirty role in this as well and nobody has challenged them yet considering they can change the duty times immediately if they want. Unfortunately they only go by statistics hopefully this latest static will be enough but I really doubt it.


Originally Posted by saab2000 (Post 607853)
Why should they? Do you fly less safely because you are not well paid?

Sounds like they have Tyler Durden doing their cost/benefit analysis


Originally Posted by ryeflyer (Post 607860)
Of course it's up to the pilot, but what corporate culture do these people work in? Can you really declare that your're fatigued? What's the sick-leave policy like if you've got a heavy cold say?


Originally Posted by boilerpilot (Post 608150)
And the fact that you either take that out of your sick time or don't get paid for that time? Regional FOs don't have a whole lot of choices. At a lot of places you will get at least one or two overnights like that a month, and if you only earn 2-4 sick hours per month, then you're spending all of your sick time (or much much more) on fatigue calls. What happens if you're really sick? The real issue is that when making the decision between calling in fatigued or when deciding to go to work for the day, the FO has to decide if the lost pay or lost sick time is worth what will probably result in a relatively safe and violation free day.

Couple that with company policy to put you on sick leave until you have visited a doctor to make sure you are not chronically fatigued.

Cycle Pilot 05-11-2009 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by Copperhed51 (Post 608020)
True, however after a long day of flying with not enough time to grab a meal, we usually have the taxi/shuttle driver stop off somewhere so we can grab something to go. That eats into my rest. Lately I've been going all day without eating because there's no time and the airports we go to don't have any food to buy. I am always starving and looking forward to my meal after I finish flying. I've been packing pop tarts and other snacks too since that's all I really have time to eat during the day.

You're kidding, right? You go all day without eating? Take a dang meal break!!! Physiological needs are JUST as important as making sure you're well trained. If you're hungry, tired, overly stressed, drunk, or have other problems which prohibit you from putting 100% of your skills towards flying the aircraft, you need to stop and take a break. These airlines don't pay us enough to take risks like that! If the company feels too many flights are being delayed because of crews taking breaks to eat, they'll change the schedule. When I was at Skywest, they started supplying us with "snack boxes" from catering which helped. We could always pull the "take a break" card, though, and eat real food if we needed to. They can't fire you because you took a delay to eat something!!

ERJ135 05-11-2009 08:55 AM

At eagle if we take a meal break we can send an acars code 69? I think. Thats a meal break and the delay goes to scheduling.

beech_nut 05-11-2009 09:11 AM

Roger Cohen's comments
 
If you are angered by the comments Roger Cohen made, in defense of some of the sweat shops he represents, you can call his office at the following number like I have just done.

Tel: 202/367-1170

The very nice receptionist told me he was out of the office doing another interview but I left him a pointed voicemail explaining how it was possible for me to come to work tired while doing a 4 day where the 1st day was min rest, 8 hours, all days were at least 12 hours long, and the last day started before 6 am and was scheduled over 15 hours.

This guy is swine.

1900luxuryliner 05-11-2009 09:42 AM


Originally Posted by Copperhed51 (Post 608020)
True, however after a long day of flying with not enough time to grab a meal, we usually have the taxi/shuttle driver stop off somewhere so we can grab something to go. That eats into my rest. Lately I've been going all day without eating because there's no time and the airports we go to don't have any food to buy. I am always starving and looking forward to my meal after I finish flying. I've been packing pop tarts and other snacks too since that's all I really have time to eat during the day.

Something to think about: if it's a multi day trip, contract says that they should give you 30 minutes for a meal at some point, for duty periods greater than 6 hours, if there was no access to food at the hotel you started at. If they don't have this 30 minutes built into your schedule, take it on your own, and write an info report about it. Explain how you needed to eat for physiological needs/ safety reasons, and that not having the 30 minute meal break was a clear contract violation. If it's a 20 minute turn at a hub, make it 50 in order to satisfy your physiological needs. There is nothing wrong with that, whatsoever. Also, speak to a union rep and CP about the issue, and file a grievance, if it comes to that.

ImEbee 05-11-2009 09:47 AM


Originally Posted by ERJ135 (Post 608387)
At eagle if we take a meal break we can send an acars code 69? I think. Thats a meal break and the delay goes to scheduling.

So when you need something to eat you ask for a 69? I don't ever want to hear another Eagle guy complain again :D

Bond 05-11-2009 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by beech_nut (Post 608396)
If you are angered by the comments Roger Cohen made, in defense of some of the sweat shops he represents, you can call his office at the following number like I have just done.

Tel: 202/367-1170

The very nice receptionist told me he was out of the office doing another interview but I left him a pointed voicemail explaining how it was possible for me to come to work tired while doing a 4 day where the 1st day was min rest, 8 hours, all days were at least 12 hours long, and the last day started before 6 am and was scheduled over 15 hours.

This guy is swine.

Well boys and girls, if there was ever any doubt whose side this guy is on, I think we know for sure know. Take a look at this quote from one of his interviews about the Colgan accident:

Roger Cohen, president of the Regional Airline Association, said Colgan's concept is the natural evolution of current safety practices. "If we are identifying cockpit discipline" as an important safety factor and "there is a random, non-punitive way" to sample data, according to Mr. Cohen, "why wouldn't we at least begin talking" about broader uses of cockpit recorders?

This was his quote in response to the ridiculous suggestion by Colgan management to start randomly auditing the CVR tapes. Everyone knows this issue has been brought up before, and everyone including ALPA, the FAA, and the NTSB agreed that it would be counterproductive to safety. For those of you that may not be familiar with it, using CRV as a tracking tool, would undermine NASA, ASAP, and any other self reporting tool available to our pilots. So I guess the guy's just trying to make a name for himself at the expense of our Colgan brothers.

Groundhog 05-11-2009 12:03 PM


Originally Posted by beech_nut (Post 608396)
If you are angered by the comments Roger Cohen made, in defense of some of the sweat shops he represents, you can call his office at the following number like I have just done.

Tel: 202/367-1170

The very nice receptionist told me he was out of the office doing another interview but I left him a pointed voicemail explaining how it was possible for me to come to work tired while doing a 4 day where the 1st day was min rest, 8 hours, all days were at least 12 hours long, and the last day started before 6 am and was scheduled over 15 hours.

This guy is swine.


Although it probably made you feel better, in the end your call won't mean anything to him. It probably gave him a good chuckle.
He knows the issues, and he knows the safety implications. His job is to spew the RAA talking points. His only mission is to present an adequate defense so that the flying public (read: sheep) will not hold Colgan or the regional airline industry liable for the accident.

Lie, obfuscate and point fingers in the other direction. A classic defense.

Hog


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands