![]() |
How does being a wholly owned subsidiary mean you should get reduced benefits?? In the end, being the employee of a subsidiary of delta should be the same as being an employee of delta. Of course the mainline guys are ok with this, all excuses aside, it doesn't matter if it's right or not, just that it's in their benefit. Maybe if you stepped up for once and demanded the same benefits and salaries for those at the wholly owned companies, there would be less of an incentive to outsource flying in general... The arrogance of some mainline guys on this board is astounding...
You may have a legitimate argument with contract carriers, but they should still have priority on their own metal... |
Originally Posted by cyrcadian
(Post 617519)
Just to toss out some ideas. . .
Complications related to implementation aside, would you (speaking on behalf of "most DAL pilots") support a change to the pass benefits that would enable a commuting pilot or flight attendant of a regional subsidiary to use S3 status? Now, to answer your question, on a mainline flight...no. On another DCI carrier...I would not have a problem. |
Originally Posted by RichieAshburn
(Post 617518)
You label me as a child because I don't support your demand of a change to your privilege?
Mine seems to be in line with DAL management and most DAL pilots. |
Originally Posted by RichieAshburn
(Post 617530)
I don't speak for DAL pilots, never said I did. However, I do speak TO DAL pilots on a daily basis and know how we (as a group) feel on numerous subjects. Read DAL pilots responses on this thread, all of us have similar opinions.
Now, to answer your question, on a mainline flight...no. On another DCI carrier...I would not have a problem. |
Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
(Post 617390)
This is not a flame but the reality of all this is you are not a DAL employee....my paycheck came from the company that I actually worked for.
"As of December 31, 2008, we (Delta Air Lines, Inc.) had a total of 84,306 full-time equivalent employees. Approximately 42% of these employees were represented by unions, including the following domestic employee groups. Delta Pilots (including pre-merger NWA pilots) 11,040 Delta Flight Superintendants (Dispatchers) 180 NWA Dispatchers 150 NWA Fleet Service, Passenger Service, Office/Clerical 11,030 NWA Simulator Technicians 40 NWA Stock Clerks 270 NWA Flight Attendants 6,290 NWA Mechanics and Related Employees 900 NWA Plant Protection Employees 10 NWA Tech Operations Trainers, Planners, Analysts 170 NWA Meteorologists 20 Comair Pilots 1,190 Comair Maintenance Employees 500 Comair Flight Attendants 790 Compass Pilots 320 Mesaba Pilots 1,090 Mesaba Flight Attendants 650 Mesaba Mechanics and Related Employees 310 Mesaba Dispatchers 25 " So is Delta falsifying SEC reports by saying Comair Pilots are employees when in fact they are not? |
Originally Posted by gmcd05
(Post 617522)
How does being a wholly owned subsidiary mean you should get reduced benefits?? In the end, being the employee of a subsidiary of delta should be the same as being an employee of delta. Of course the mainline guys are ok with this, all excuses aside, it doesn't matter if it's right or not, just that it's in their benefit. Maybe if you stepped up for once and demanded the same benefits and salaries for those at the wholly owned companies, there would be less of an incentive to outsource flying in general... The arrogance of some mainline guys on this board is astounding...
You may have a legitimate argument with contract carriers, but they should still have priority on their own metal... |
Originally Posted by RichieAshburn
(Post 617502)
Your pilot group negotiating better pay from YOUR company is not the same as you guys demanding a privilege from MY company.
And yes, it is a privilege. Not a benefit, not a right, not part of the compensation package. My company can change your travel privileges any time they see fit(as they can with mainline also). L. Free and Reduced Rate Transportation 1. Free and reduced rate transportation privileges granted by Company policy to noncontract personnel now or in the future, will be extended to pilots. 2. There will be no substantial reduction in on-line transportation privileges as a whole, for pilots during the term of this PWA. I guess Comair pilots should have had a similar clause in THEIR contract. :( PG |
Originally Posted by RichieAshburn
(Post 617530)
Now, to answer your question, on a mainline flight...no. On another DCI carrier...I would not have a problem.
This is you honest opinion? Why? I mean really tell me why. You claim you are such a hero for taking the FA jumpseat to help out a commuting regional guy, yet you decide this is a helping hand you are not willing to give. I don't get it. How do S3's, for commuting only, hurt you? |
This thread proves to me a few things that I always thought:
1. Most pilots would eat their young if it meant a better life for themselves. 2. If someone isn't pisin and moaning about something, they are not a pilot. 3. Our ALPA, is not a union, it is an association. Meaning that if you are a member of ALPA, you are just associated with it. A union is unified not divided. If our groups worked together and everyone was not out for themselves, this job would have a good future in america. I wonder if their is a Medical Doctors Central forum where they all bit88 about each others bosses? |
Originally Posted by DAL4EVER
(Post 617577)
The arrogance you refer to, is it the same arrogance that had the CMR MEC's stated position that any furloughee must resign his original seniority number to come work for CMR during the 2001-2007 timeframe? Talk about brother helping a fellow brother in need. And why is it up to us to argue for your wages and benefits? I do think you should be brought up, supported CMR guys on strike in 2001, but in the end only the respective employee group can fight their fight. CMR guys certainly didn't rally behind the DAL guys the past eight years.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:44 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands