![]() |
I dont get it, was fatigue really the issue on 3407?
The only thing we can pray for is to be allowed to fly more than 8hrs in a day, and not be allowed to have duty days longer than 12hrs |
Originally Posted by aviatorpr
(Post 629234)
for commuters say goodbye to your cherished days off, this guy is going to have you in domicile 8 hours prior
Also what is the definition of a "commuter"? 2 hours drive? 3? 300 miles? 400 miles? This seems too complicated to actually happen. |
Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
(Post 629277)
That would be a major change in terms of employment, and against the will of the employee at that. NO airline can afford such a bill in today's economy.
What scares me about this guy is that he is giving up our privacy rights. What next medical records? Think Southwest has the right to know where you got that itch from? And there was no mention of the $20k salary that F/O;s make. ***? Poor Wages = reduced safety. Looks like he wants to run for president next election. There is a group of problems not just fatigue. That's just one link in the destruction chain. |
some thoughts:
1. what happened to ONE LEVEL OF SAFETY-- why is the talk of regional airlines only getting a 12 hour duty day- it shoudl be the same for all 2. the above rule will make airlines ****ed off and moaning and groaning and of course they would want to be able to fly more than 8hrs in a duty period to cx the pilots required for the 12 hr future duty rule- so manpower evens out-- IE manpower neutral. 3. did you know that the NTSB has made over 450 recommendations that the FAA has yet to propose and have only implemented about 12 items-- pretty freaking sad if you ask me--- pilots flying on these antiquated rules, the FAA is at as much fault as most of the pilots for not makeing things happen sooner. 4. i seriously doubt things will change--- they havent for almost 60 years and i doubt they will start soon. 5. personally, i think they should adopt the european rules-- they must be doing something right over there- they are living the dream. 6. anti trust immunity, outsourcing flying at the major airline level, downsizing, the huge gap b/w 70 seaters and the smallest mainline aircraft-- things are only going to get more interesting. SKIPPY-- no tholding my breath |
Test case?
Wonder if Babbitt commuted when he was flying? This may be a good test of whether a line pilot's perspective will make any difference at the FAA.
|
Originally Posted by skippy
(Post 629314)
personally, i think they should adopt the european rules-- they must be doing something right over there- they are living the dream.
|
Originally Posted by tomgoodman
(Post 629319)
Wonder if Babbitt commuted when he was flying? This may be a good test of whether a line pilot's perspective will make any difference at the FAA.
|
Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
(Post 629235)
I've heard that the new fatigue regulation are going to be nothing more than reduced prices on Red Bull.
|
Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
(Post 629277)
And good luck getting a restriction on commuting instituted. To do so would mean our employers would be forced to may moving expenses to every commuting pilot who was hired when commuting was legal and unrestricted.
Of course, for any future moves, caused by displacement or base closures for example, I would definitely agree that the company should pay to move you. |
There is no possible legal way to ban commuting. It's too hard to legally define...
If they require all pilots to be in domicile 8 hours prior, then that is duty and you get paid for it (and it counts against your other duty limits). If they actually banned commuting, they would lose 30% of the pilot force...this career is not worth dragging your family all over the map for, may as well go back on active duty. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:08 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands