Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   FAA Chief to Draft Tougher Rules to Alleviate (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/41076-faa-chief-draft-tougher-rules-alleviate.html)

rickair7777 06-15-2009 10:24 PM


Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs (Post 629283)
I dont get it, was fatigue really the issue on 3407?

It will be hard to know for sure, but I think so.

I have done transcon redeye commutes, but I arrived 12 hours prior to show so I could sleep. I would not have cared to go directly to work after such a commute, and I have years of experience with military sleep deprivation. I can stay awake for days if needed, but I cannot make myself function particularly well after missing the first night's rest.

The CA was sleeping in the crew room during the day. I've done that too...after work while waiting on my ride home. No fun there either, unless colgan had some really great rest facilities.

dojetdriver 06-15-2009 11:14 PM


Originally Posted by aviatorpr (Post 629234)
for commuters say goodbye to your cherished days off, this guy is going to have you in domicile 8 hours prior

Ok, assuming that did become the reg. Commuting in, arriving at domicle EXACTLY 8 hours prior to show. THEN going to a hotel or crashpad is so much better than an RR overnight following a 16 hour day, to be followed by ANOTHER looooooong duty day.

KC10 FATboy 06-15-2009 11:21 PM


Originally Posted by joethepilot (Post 629214)
This could be good for us in more than one way.

1. We actually get reasonable rest requirements.

2. Better rest requirements, and shorter duty days = more pilots, same amount of flying. This may lead to some recalls at the regional level, to cover the flying that would not be covered due to increased rest.

A way I could see it going bad, and how airline will argue against it:

If regionals have to increase staffing levels to comply with increased rest requirements that naturally means that costs go up. If costs go up Mainline will be looking to cut it somewhere... where is the question that scares me.

Bingo. You guys are getting what you wanted ... many of us warned you all to be careful what you asked for.

The second part of that scenario is ... costs go up, so the tickets go up, so less people can afford to fly, demand further drops, and parent company then needs less pilots ... mainline and regional.

No matter what happens, this is going to cost the company. And that will mean jobs lost.

FlyJSH 06-16-2009 12:28 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 629372)
The CA was sleeping in the crew room during the day. I've done that too...after work while waiting on my ride home. No fun there either, unless colgan had some really great rest facilities.

At Colgan, we dont sleep, we nap...... just ask Harry Mitchell VP of Ops.

FlyJSH 06-16-2009 12:36 AM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 629389)
Bingo. You guys are getting what you wanted ... we many of us warned you all to be careful what you asked for.

The second part of that scenario is ... costs go up, so the tickets go up, so less people can afford to fly, demand further drops, and parent company then needs less pilots ... mainline and regional.

No matter what happens, this is going to cost the company. And that will mean jobs lost.

If the cost of the flight crew were doubled, the price of a ticket would increase by less than $3.00 per flight hour (that is based on pilot pay per seat). So a trans continental flight would increase by $10-15. If this is enough to keep people from flying (while they pay $15 for an extra bag , $10 for a window seat, or $5 for a scotch), then this industry is already doomed.

CAPIP1998 06-16-2009 04:53 AM


Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast (Post 629277)
Why does he seem set on fixing duty time at the regionals only? Why not fix it for all pilots.


Originally Posted by skippy (Post 629314)
some thoughts:

1. what happened to ONE LEVEL OF SAFETY-- why is the talk of regional airlines only getting a 12 hour duty day- it shoudl be the same for all

Yesterday's meeting was closed door, so we don't know exactly what was said there. However, if you watch the testimony given by Babbitt (and others) from last Thursday's Congressional Hearing, they made it clear that they will be proposing changes AND new legislation regarding 121, not just regionals. There were multiple people who sited the "One Level of Safety", and it was clear that they are going to target ALL 121 carriers. The idea being that if everyone is affected, it will eliminate the "competitive advantage" in the words of Mr. Petri (We call this "whipsaw").

All in all, I'm a little excited to see what will happen. Next up, the senate hearing!

Onfinal 06-16-2009 04:55 AM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 629389)
Bingo. You guys are getting what you wanted ... many of us warned you all to be careful what you asked for.

The second part of that scenario is ... costs go up, so the tickets go up, so less people can afford to fly, demand further drops, and parent company then needs less pilots ... mainline and regional.

No matter what happens, this is going to cost the company. And that will mean jobs lost.

KC10 FATboy:

In motto of one of our great states..."Live Free or Die" there are fates worst than death! If someone chooses to be a slave the rest of their life, so be it. I don't have to choose the same fate.

I'd rather go on the dreaded unemployment line than to cower and see this BS continue to play out for a lifetime!

deltabound 06-16-2009 05:51 AM


Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs (Post 629283)
I dont get it, was fatigue really the issue on 3407?

Unquestionably. I have sympathy for the FO's actions (commute with sleep planned in the crew room), less so for the CA (I understand he could afford but was too cheap to pay for a hotel --- we've all been there but that doesn't make it right.)

As for the likely FAA changes:
  • Harder checkrides -- cost nothing (to the airlines, anyway).
  • Make PRIA's cover every piece of paper generated on you, EVER, - Costs almost nothing. (except except now you discuss every comment ever written in every margin of every eval for every job interview for the rest of your career. Much more interesting than Sat/Unsat)
  • Change rest requirements, max duty days/flying hours, and a rational, methodical scientific approach to circadian rhythms -- EXPENSIVE AND WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
1 of the 3 above might actually make a difference. 2 of the 3 will make almost no difference. Hmm. I wonder what's going to happen?

hslightnin 06-16-2009 06:12 AM


Originally Posted by deltabound (Post 629456)
Unquestionably. I have sympathy for the FO's actions (commute with sleep planned in the crew room), less so for the CA (I understand he could afford but was too cheap to pay for a hotel --- we've all been there but that doesn't make it right.)

As for the likely FAA changes:
  • Harder checkrides -- cost nothing (to the airlines, anyway).
[LIST]

they would get expensive if people start failing, sim time isnt cheap

flycrj200 06-16-2009 06:55 AM

I posted this on the Major thread I thought I should post it here too

What’s next?
Pilots have to live at base
Pilots must be forced to sleep for 8 hours prior to any flight
Pilots are not allowed any alcohol 24 hours prior to any flight
Pilots are not allowed any medication 24 hours prior to any flight
Pilots have to maintain a healthy low carb low fat diet
Pilots have to work out at least 5 days per week
Pilots have to be a certain height, weight, and race.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands