Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Court Rules Eeoc Suit Can Proceed To Trial Ag >

Court Rules Eeoc Suit Can Proceed To Trial Ag

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Court Rules Eeoc Suit Can Proceed To Trial Ag

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2009, 11:29 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default Court Rules Eeoc Suit Can Proceed To Trial Ag

Court Rules EEOC Suit Can Proceed to Trial Against Skywest Airlines

In its lawsuit (EEOC v. SkyWest Airlines, Inc., N.D. Ill. No 07 C 4925), the EEOC alleges that SkyWest discriminated against three former employees by subjecting them to sexual harassment by a co-worker and then firing them in retaliation for complaining about the hostile workplace, all in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Nevets is offline  
Old 07-03-2009, 02:02 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pause's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Frenchy plane/ Left
Posts: 338
Default

The court noted that between six and eight offensive remarks were made to each of the women and included the speaker’s statements, “that he wished he could put his mouth on her breasts” and “that he wanted to have sex with her and get between her thighs.”

I've said that about many of Skywest female employees. Of course...not to their face. Anyone know if the pilot is still employed??
pause is offline  
Old 07-03-2009, 06:42 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by pause View Post
The court noted that between six and eight offensive remarks were made to each of the women and included the speaker’s statements, “that he wished he could put his mouth on her breasts” and “that he wanted to have sex with her and get between her thighs.”

I've said that about many of Skywest female employees. Of course...not to their face. Anyone know if the pilot is still employed??
wow, that is pretty bad... most of us probably have fantasized about a coworker(s), but what kind of prick/IDIOT would actually say it to their face?!
kalyx522 is offline  
Old 07-04-2009, 04:11 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Default

Originally Posted by kalyx522 View Post
wow, that is pretty bad... most of us probably have fantasized about a coworker(s), but what kind of prick/IDIOT would actually say it to their face?!
The things I've heard my fellow pilots tell the FAs....and the things I've been told by FAs - it's not surprising at all in my experience!
gtechpilot is offline  
Old 07-04-2009, 09:58 AM
  #5  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by kalyx522 View Post
wow, that is pretty bad... most of us probably have fantasized about a coworker(s), but what kind of prick/IDIOT would actually say it to their face?!

Or, it could just be a bunch of B$ false accusations from a few pilot-hatin' FAs that got pi$$ed off at something totally unrelated and wanted to get someone fired or try to squeeze SKW for some $$$ in a settlement after they got themselves fired. It's not like it's the first time an FA accused a pilot of doing/saying something inappropriate. Not always true though.

But I like the way you assume the guy did it after reading a complaint.

SemperFly
SemperFly is offline  
Old 07-06-2009, 05:07 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
John Pennekamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Posts: 876
Default

We at ASA have two pilots awaiting trial for assault/battery on a gate agent. Both incidents happened in ATL and the gate agents "claim" the pilot either struck them or twisted their arm. Her friends at the gates next door (~50 yards away) "claim" they "sawed 'da whole thang".

My understanding is that the gate agents tried several times to get a monetary settlement in exchange for dropping the charges. The pilots elected to go to trial.
John Pennekamp is offline  
Old 07-06-2009, 06:20 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by John Pennekamp View Post
We at ASA have two pilots awaiting trial for assault/battery on a gate agent. Both incidents happened in ATL and the gate agents "claim" the pilot either struck them or twisted their arm. Her friends at the gates next door (~50 yards away) "claim" they "sawed 'da whole thang".

My understanding is that the gate agents tried several times to get a monetary settlement in exchange for dropping the charges. The pilots elected to go to trial.
Good, people in America should stand up against lawsuit abuse, a trial by your peers is always within your rights..not easy, but many attorneys use that resoning to try to get you to settle when their was no wrong doing in the first place.
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 07-06-2009, 02:18 PM
  #8  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by SemperFly View Post
Or, it could just be a bunch of B$ false accusations from a few pilot-hatin' FAs that got pi$$ed off at something totally unrelated and wanted to get someone fired or try to squeeze SKW for some $$$ in a settlement after they got themselves fired. It's not like it's the first time an FA accused a pilot of doing/saying something inappropriate. Not always true though.

But I like the way you assume the guy did it after reading a complaint.

SemperFly
Which in one good reason to have representation from an entity recognized by the NMB.
Nevets is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
Major
2
01-09-2009 03:12 PM
EWRflyr
Major
6
12-11-2008 09:12 AM
pens66
Regional
103
11-08-2008 12:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices