Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
American Eagle ALPA Vs. AEPA >

American Eagle ALPA Vs. AEPA

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

American Eagle ALPA Vs. AEPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2009 | 09:43 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
From: GV Captain
Default

The sad thing is that those Alpa's activist fail to realize that. Pathetic.
Reply
Old 07-08-2009 | 12:07 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
I would check to see who's behind AEPA. I believe it is former MEC members and even a MEC chairman. They were the ones in charge. Do they just want to be in charge again? What part did they play in the 16 year contract? There are a lot of question to be asked/answered before jumping on the unknown bandwagon.
You are correct, many of the people behind the AEPA are in fact former leadership people responsible for the 16 year contract. They are counting on the fact that there is only a minority of that pilot group who knows or remembers.

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
As far as the 16 year contract, it sucks but was done for the right reason.
Pontius, if you are at Eagle, I assume you came there well after the contract since your profile says FO. When there were 4 separate Eagles, AMR could whipsaw them all against each other. Wings West would have 2 year upgrades and Simmons would have 8 year upgrades. Don't like this contract, we'll furlough from this group and grow another. The 16 year contract solved that problem while creating others. Which is worth more?
However, like everythign else in that 16 year contract, the scope section itself was written so poorly, that all it did was join the 4 eagles into one seniority list.... it left the door wide open to subcontract out as much as AMR could get away with.

When their contract expires, instead of whipsawing 4 wholly owned regionals, they'll whipsaw one wholly owned, and several outsourced.
They have 71 pilots on the street and at the same time are negotiating scope relief with APA. When that happens, they will want larger jets at the commuters. Through past trial and error (TSA) they learned they can outsource flying so long as their traingin center is incapabale of keeping up with AMR demand... so, they furlough 71 pilots when they are shortstaffed already... they send instructors back tot he line, creating trainging and displacement delays....
When the APA gives in, or the arbitrator awars the jets to AMR commuters, they will recall all pilots, and overwhelm the training center to recreate the need for outsourced flying, just like they did with TSA.
Reply
Old 07-08-2009 | 12:55 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: CR7 Capt.
Default

I know the aepa is headed up by a former alpa mec officer - but not the mec during the 1997 contract. Eagle pilots have good reason to distrust alpa national; their insistince that eagle pilots try "interest based barganing" for example. The first thing alpa did for me was negotiate a 10K pay cut. Haven't trusted them ever since.
Reply
Old 07-08-2009 | 01:03 PM
  #14  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,057
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

It will be interesting when ALPA gets the majority of their dues from regional carriers as opposed to mainline. I bet we are approaching that point, and I wonder if this will change the ALPA national sentiment.
Reply
Old 07-08-2009 | 02:39 PM
  #15  
Pontius Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Question

Originally Posted by Mason32
You are correct, many of the people behind the AEPA are in fact former leadership people responsible for the 16 year contract. They are counting on the fact that there is only a minority of that pilot group who knows or remembers.



However, like everythign else in that 16 year contract, the scope section itself was written so poorly, that all it did was join the 4 eagles into one seniority list.... it left the door wide open to subcontract out as much as AMR could get away with.

When their contract expires, instead of whipsawing 4 wholly owned regionals, they'll whipsaw one wholly owned, and several outsourced.
They have 71 pilots on the street and at the same time are negotiating scope relief with APA. When that happens, they will want larger jets at the commuters. Through past trial and error (TSA) they learned they can outsource flying so long as their traingin center is incapabale of keeping up with AMR demand... so, they furlough 71 pilots when they are shortstaffed already... they send instructors back tot he line, creating trainging and displacement delays....
When the APA gives in, or the arbitrator awars the jets to AMR commuters, they will recall all pilots, and overwhelm the training center to recreate the need for outsourced flying, just like they did with TSA.
I wonder what would happen if you ran an airline with honesty and integrity rather than all these games?

Would the world blow up or something?
Reply
Old 07-08-2009 | 03:08 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by Pontius Pilot
I wonder what would happen if you ran an airline with honesty and integrity rather than all these games?

Would the world blow up or something?

No, your paycheck would say Southwest, or Jetblue.....
Reply
Old 07-08-2009 | 05:58 PM
  #17  
withthatsaid182's Avatar
Drinkin' coffee...
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: P-p-piiilatusss
Default

What's going to happen in 2012 when the contract is up?

Is it going to be as chaotic as I think it will be....
Reply
Old 07-09-2009 | 10:46 AM
  #18  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,057
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by withthatsaid182
What's going to happen in 2012 when the contract is up?

Is it going to be as chaotic as I think it will be....
Doubtful. I dont think our pilot group is united/fired up enough to vote for a strike. I expect a long drawn out process, but in the end we will see meager gains in pay at the expense of work rules, much the same way our amendment rounds have been. We wont get an industry leading contract, but an industry average one.
Reply
Old 07-10-2009 | 05:49 AM
  #19  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 14
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
The MEC chairman hasn't flown an AE airplane in about 8 years and the upper cadre is seen by many as more interested in protecting their pretty good lifestyles then taking on management, thus the coziness. The top MEC officers are all making well over $100K annually and are in the mid-senioirty range.
The problem is very few people actually vote. I dealt with the current leadership and saw first hand some of what goes on (if it's still HM, DR). I've seen some people get a committee position and think they run more than they do. One went on to be a LEC chair.

I don't think the AEPA leadership is the answer either. The current leaders want to keep their position and the old ones want it back. The best answer would be to find someone new in the pilot group that wants to do it, would be good at it, and elect him/her.
Reply
Old 07-10-2009 | 06:09 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
The problem is very few people actually vote. I dealt with the current leadership and saw first hand some of what goes on (if it's still HM, DR). I've seen some people get a committee position and think they run more than they do. One went on to be a LEC chair.

I don't think the AEPA leadership is the answer either. The current leaders want to keep their position and the old ones want it back. The best answer would be to find someone new in the pilot group that wants to do it, would be good at it, and elect him/her.
I agree.

NEITHER group will lead our pilots into the future. It will take a completely new team. Unfortunately, most likely it will be the current featherbeders who will smoke a deal with management and once again make a sacrifice look like a victory.

This pilot group will be squarely in the middle of the pack regional compensation-wise in the future.......of course, that will be one reason it survives. It already has the network and infrastructure and once it can fly a reasonably profitable aircraft, it's labor costs are all that's then necessary to insure prosperity for management.....that and a pistol to the head in the form of another carrier flying just enough to insure whipsaw capabilities.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
APM145
Union Talk
0
02-15-2009 04:23 PM
Rotorhead
Regional
20
02-07-2009 09:58 AM
FlyinSunset1
Major
14
01-28-2009 08:49 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM
crazyhorse79
Regional
14
12-04-2008 03:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices