Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Question for Dash-8 Drivers >

Question for Dash-8 Drivers

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Question for Dash-8 Drivers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2009, 11:57 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pilot772's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: UAL Guppy CA
Posts: 233
Default

Originally Posted by SpiraMirabilis View Post
And that is written... where exactly? You're not allowed to move CHECKED bags from the cargo compartment to the passenger compartment but you MAY move already screened carry on bags (which have a special ALREADY SCREENED neon green tag in united) from the cargo compartment to the passenger compartment.

Not only would I say this in public, I would do it in front of a safety inspector grinning the entire time. Besides, most of the time they're not even in the cargo compartment yet -- they're on the rack.
Unless things have changed since I left the 121 world a couple of years ago. what is being described is completely legal both via FAA regs and Mesa's Ops Specs. I can't speak to what Piedmont has written in there valet checked bag program approved by the FAA (as many airlines have different policies and ops specs all legal once the FAA gives their stamp.) Back to the topic at hand I did the exact thing that was described taking security screened bags from the cargo bin and placed in the cabin to accommodate for weight. Oh and who was I doing this for it was to get a FED on the jumpseat. He was appreciative and had no problem with what I did. FWIW
pilot772 is offline  
Old 08-09-2009, 12:00 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
Default

Neither am I (trying to get in a ****ing match) and those limitations are not in Mesa's GOM or OpSpecs. That was my point -- just because an airline does something differently does not make that "WRONG". So please try a more diplomatic course in the future right off the gate... maybe something like 'Wow, thats interesting... at PDT we're not able to do that.' rather than something like 'YOURE GOING TO FAA VIOLATION HELL!!!'
SpiraMirabilis is offline  
Old 08-09-2009, 12:06 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by Dash8widget View Post
I seem to remember that QX's 200's had a max ZFW of 32400. I'm surprised that you guys are usually able to take a jumpseater then - maybe your average BOW's are less but don't Mesa's 200's have APUs? They weren't installed on the QX 200's and max ZFW was still a problem and that's with 400 more available lbs.

Max landing weight was 34500 - you could always take 2100 lbs of fuel + burn + 100 lbs for taxi. It's been a little while now, but that's one of those numbers I will probably always remember
Mesa Dash-200s do not have APUs. Some of the old ex-PDT aircraft have the switches for them but the actual APU has been removed.
SpiraMirabilis is offline  
Old 08-09-2009, 12:42 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DASH8AV8R's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: A320/321
Posts: 125
Default

We did operate like you before the Crash of your sister airline B1900 in Clt. Then we went to this more restrictive operation. Anyway safe flying
DASH8AV8R is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abbey2
Part 135
22
03-16-2009 04:23 AM
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
alwaysflying
Major
4
01-28-2009 02:23 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices