Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers
#381
FOQA is great, except for the fact it only uses numbers. There are many scenarios where FOQA will show up as a problem by the numbers, yet in the cockpit both guys are 100% on top of things. Gusty winds come to mind.... Ref +/- 5kts with a 30+ knot wind and a green line 10 kts above ref may look fine on FOQA, but in reality we need to carry the extra speed (Ref + half gust factor). Talking with the "gatekeeper" these factors are hard to see, and in the case of 100+ departures and arrivals in a single push the fines would be outrageous when people are exercising that thing called "pilot judgment".
Also I don't understand why airline pilots are having any issue with requirement to have an Airline Transport Pilot certificate to fly for an airline.
#382
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 1
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off any debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.
True, it has before and still takes a few thousand hours to get on somewhere, but the possibility of getting in low time is what a lot of people are bidding.
Granted this is on my situation, I don't expect to go anywhere soon and if I stick with this I am ready to put in the time to get the hours. However, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully will end up taking that route.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the one of the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
True, it has before and still takes a few thousand hours to get on somewhere, but the possibility of getting in low time is what a lot of people are bidding.
Granted this is on my situation, I don't expect to go anywhere soon and if I stick with this I am ready to put in the time to get the hours. However, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully will end up taking that route.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the one of the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Last edited by woodfinx; 08-04-2010 at 09:50 AM.
#383
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
#384
7.27%
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Boeing
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Regards,
PtP; Living life one slap in the face at a time.
#385
Are we there yet??!!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.
You must be a part time CFIer. In 2 yrs I was I had done almost 1000hrs of dual given and bought block time in a twin and that was when instructing was worse than it is now...the early 90s. Maybe you need to move to where the work is. That is what I did. If you not willing to move, then don't complain.
#386
+1 PTP
I had 1900TT before I even got my first job flying single engine piston cargo planes. I'm sorry for those that can't buy their way into the cockpit anymore.
I had 1900TT before I even got my first job flying single engine piston cargo planes. I'm sorry for those that can't buy their way into the cockpit anymore.
WOW. I thought it was the front side of the curve, as you put it, people that had the "I want it now" entitlement syndrome. No offense Gen "Y"ers. I'm sorry, but a lot of people in this industry weren't even able to get airline jobs with 1500 hrs. Times are much different than 4-5 years ago, and the 250 hr airline pilot is a thing of the past. GOOD RIDDENS!! Your whinning isn't going to get much sympathy. Go fly 135 for a while and you will eventually appreciate what you've learned from that valuable experience, cause it may save your life some day.
Regards,
PtP; Living life one slap in the face at a time.
Regards,
PtP; Living life one slap in the face at a time.
#387
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
#389
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
#390
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.
Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.


