Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers >

Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Proposed ATP/1500 Minimums for 121 Carriers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2009 | 09:00 AM
  #381  
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
Line Holder
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 41
From: Middle Seat
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
FOQA is great, except for the fact it only uses numbers. There are many scenarios where FOQA will show up as a problem by the numbers, yet in the cockpit both guys are 100% on top of things. Gusty winds come to mind.... Ref +/- 5kts with a 30+ knot wind and a green line 10 kts above ref may look fine on FOQA, but in reality we need to carry the extra speed (Ref + half gust factor). Talking with the "gatekeeper" these factors are hard to see, and in the case of 100+ departures and arrivals in a single push the fines would be outrageous when people are exercising that thing called "pilot judgment".
That's why the data would be compared with other operations and be accounting for the number of operations etc... This would come down on airlines and require them to do better training, pilots should support this.

Also I don't understand why airline pilots are having any issue with requirement to have an Airline Transport Pilot certificate to fly for an airline.
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 05:48 PM
  #382  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 208
Likes: 1
Default

One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off any debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.

True, it has before and still takes a few thousand hours to get on somewhere, but the possibility of getting in low time is what a lot of people are bidding.

Granted this is on my situation, I don't expect to go anywhere soon and if I stick with this I am ready to put in the time to get the hours. However, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully will end up taking that route.

Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the one of the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.

Last edited by woodfinx; 08-04-2010 at 09:50 AM.
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 05:56 PM
  #383  
iPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.

Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.

Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
I wouldn't be too concerned. There are many flying jobs that aren't CFI'ing and aren't 121. Take Ameriflight, for instance. When the airlines start hiring again there's going to be a lot of people moving out of those jobs to the airlines. Airlines that can't find enough pilots will likely have to increase pay to convince more to come over. So all those night cargo, on-demand charter, banner towing, etc jobs will be looking for pilots with hours like yours to keep flying. I think this will help everyone even though you'll have to work at other places beyond the airlines first.
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 06:35 PM
  #384  
7.27%
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Boeing
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.

Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.

Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
WOW. I thought it was the front side of the curve, as you put it, people that had the "I want it now" entitlement syndrome. No offense Gen "Y"ers. I'm sorry, but a lot of people in this industry weren't even able to get airline jobs with 1500 hrs. Times are much different than 4-5 years ago, and the 250 hr airline pilot is a thing of the past. GOOD RIDDENS!! Your whinning isn't going to get much sympathy. Go fly 135 for a while and you will eventually appreciate what you've learned from that valuable experience, cause it may save your life some day.

Regards,

PtP; Living life one slap in the face at a time.
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 06:40 PM
  #385  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.
You consider it a slap in the face that the mins are now written by the FAA on what used to be the absolute hiring mins. Granted, there was a few yrs were the requirements got way to low and those hired during that boom time were very, very lucky and most of them don't even realize it.

You must be a part time CFIer. In 2 yrs I was I had done almost 1000hrs of dual given and bought block time in a twin and that was when instructing was worse than it is now...the early 90s. Maybe you need to move to where the work is. That is what I did. If you not willing to move, then don't complain.
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 06:44 PM
  #386  
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Default

+1 PTP

I had 1900TT before I even got my first job flying single engine piston cargo planes. I'm sorry for those that can't buy their way into the cockpit anymore.


Originally Posted by Palmtree Pilot
WOW. I thought it was the front side of the curve, as you put it, people that had the "I want it now" entitlement syndrome. No offense Gen "Y"ers. I'm sorry, but a lot of people in this industry weren't even able to get airline jobs with 1500 hrs. Times are much different than 4-5 years ago, and the 250 hr airline pilot is a thing of the past. GOOD RIDDENS!! Your whinning isn't going to get much sympathy. Go fly 135 for a while and you will eventually appreciate what you've learned from that valuable experience, cause it may save your life some day.

Regards,

PtP; Living life one slap in the face at a time.
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 06:49 PM
  #387  
mmaviator's Avatar
pants on the ground
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
From: back seat
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.

Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.

Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
I think all the pilots except the 250hr wonders instructed/flew freight/ towed banners, etc.....for more than 2 years. So with that said and the position you are currently at, would you like it if all your hard work was for nothing in the eyes of Human Resources? Cause it would be since they were just looking for warm bodies(read a wet com. multi.) and of course you have more experience than the others with 700tt.
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 08:11 PM
  #388  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Fero's
Default

I had over 2500 hours when I got hired at a commuter. Took about 4 years of CFI work and night freight/135 work. My myopic view is "Why is this an issue?"
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 04:59 AM
  #389  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.

Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.

Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Wow what a sad post. You think you are the only one out there that has had to instruct several years before getting the airline job? I instructed for 4 years and 1400 hours before I got my first job. It took me a total of 6 years to get my first regional job from the time I started school. All the while I had a family and I was paying off my student loans. And that was just 5 years ago before the big hiring boom. Even pinnacle is requiring 1000 total and 200 multi to even get looked at now. Times are changing and I am glad they are. If you really want the job you will work hard to earn it. If you are a guy who feels entitled to the job and you want it now and not after you earn it then you wont last when you get here anyway.
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 05:19 AM
  #390  
NWA320pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: 737 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
One of the major problems with this bill is that it is a direct slap in the face to pilots who are fresh out of training and tens of thousands of dollars in debt. I am a 700 hour pilot and have been CFIing for 2 years (CFI @ 150). At present rate I would have to keep instructing another 2 years AT BEST to get an ATP and get a job, that is 5-6 years of my life, including training, that would be dedicated to time building all for a job that pays just enough to support myself heaven forbid I wish to pay off said debt or start a family. And I am on backside of the curve, not the front side.

Now granted this is my situation, I am also currently applying to the Navy so hopefully I will not have to deal with all of it.

Collectively aviation in the U.S. has always been regarded as the safest in the world, I have no idea why one crash (which inevitably will happen) is grounds for changing what has worked for so long. Talk about fixing a problem that doesn't exist, way to go reactive government.
Sorry to tell you this but this is a very tough industry. I am amazed at your feelings of entitlement, in this business that won't get you very far. The people that are willing to work hard and put in the effort are successful in aviation. Having a minimum level of experience in order to fly passengers safely isn't too much to ask.......
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices