Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Flew into Mke today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2009 | 07:54 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
If you had the option to live in base you wouldn't take it. No one wanted the aircraft here but once they are you'd be an idiot to not bid to live in base.

PS You work for GoJets. There's not larger example of a hypocrite.
Noone is defending go jetss

Do I think it was unfortuate that it had to come to go jettss for tsa? YES

Do I care and feel that the mistakes of 2005 are in anyway because of me and should be my problem? NO
Reply
Old 08-13-2009 | 07:55 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by StrikeTime
Just because you work for Gojet doesn’t mean you have to constantly talk crap about every other carrier. I’ve seen nothing of value come out of your posts. Your attempt at trying to put out a misconception that every carrier is as bad as yours is failing… just stop while you’re at it.

You must be the ashamed pilot, or worn out from working for such an outfit since you have so much to say about everyone else.. Redirect those feelings of hostility elsewhere.. buy yourself a stress ball, maybe that will help or just go get laid if you can afford it. How awesome it is to be anonymous, right?

As for RAH pilots, I am not happy with what is happening but neither are they. A majority of us understand this. If you weren’t so ashamed of yourself maybe you would have the opportunity to talk with some of those pilots (in person rather than behind a keyboard) and realize what the RAH pilot group thinks of this as a whole.
Sorry, looks like I hit a nerve.
Reply
Old 08-14-2009 | 06:12 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Meaning what? If you think that means you don't have to worry about wake you're dead wrong. It's not just about size of aircraft. Lighten up dude.

Isn't the wake strength (generally) related to the aircraft weight. I mean, that why they use the word "heavy". Right?

Is the E170 gross weight that much more then a CRJ?
Reply
Old 08-14-2009 | 06:17 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: http://rahcontractnow.org/
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
Sorry, looks like I hit a nerve.
You didn’t hit a nerve, I’m just annoyed with idiots like you on this forum.
Reply
Old 08-14-2009 | 07:55 AM
  #45  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,889
Likes: 129
Default

Originally Posted by MD80
Isn't the wake strength (generally) related to the aircraft weight.
Generally but not always...the 757, for example.
Reply
Old 08-14-2009 | 08:04 AM
  #46  
Killer51883's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: E-170
Default

i think this guy got ****ed off when he was flying a 172 and told caution wake turbulence departing citation
Reply
Old 08-14-2009 | 08:32 AM
  #47  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MD80
Isn't the wake strength (generally) related to the aircraft weight. I mean, that why they use the word "heavy". Right?

Is the E170 gross weight that much more then a CRJ?
Please don't tell me it takes a heavy to cause a disturbance. An aircraft of lesser weight can upset an aircraft of greater weight just as well. Most upsets are from 757s and 727s yet relatively few are from 767s/777/747s (percentage wise).

You don't have to be flipped completely upside down for it to become an issue. Vref over the numbers in an ERJ with a wake sweeping across from an E-Jet/erj/crj/717/737 could still cause enough disturbance where it's better to go missed. Wake strength might "generally" be related to aircraft weight but that doesn't mean you have to be behind a A380 to notice it. Refuse to believe it all you want but wake is like gun, don't show it respect and it could come back to bite you.
Reply
Old 08-14-2009 | 08:53 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
Sorry, looks like I hit a nerve.
no, it's not that you work for GoJet, necessarily. It's that you constantly bash every other airline out there,except the one you happen to be at at the current time. You even bashed GoJet before you went there, as did 2 other well known GJetters on this forum. THAT is the problem people have with you (and those other 2).
Reply
Old 08-14-2009 | 08:57 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: http://rahcontractnow.org/
Default

Originally Posted by IBPilot
no, it's not that you work for GoJet, necessarily. It's that you constantly bash every other airline out there,except the one you happen to be at at the current time. You even bashed GoJet before you went there, as did 2 other well known GJetters on this forum. THAT is the problem people have with you (and those other 2).
Exactly. Thank you.
Reply
Old 08-14-2009 | 08:59 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Default

Mod note:

This might be a good time to, once again, explain how the ignore user function works. Click on the users screen name, click on personal profile, and add the user to your ignore list.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
Major
26
05-23-2009 07:53 AM
jungle
Money Talk
2
02-19-2009 07:50 PM
ToiletDuck
Money Talk
20
10-09-2008 11:16 PM
TonyMontana
Leaving the Career
206
09-30-2008 07:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices