Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Q400 Cities (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/43211-q400-cities.html)

brewpilot 08-23-2009 09:48 PM


Originally Posted by powrful1 (Post 667275)
I hear the Linx Qs are about to sign a contract with CO and flying out of IAH.

LOL Republic has to buy CO first then that will happen

Cruise 08-24-2009 04:50 AM


Originally Posted by goaround2000 (Post 667206)
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. I'm at XJT, and I'm also realistic enough to know that CAL will eventually bring the Q to IAH. I would venture a guess that anything in Louisiana and south Texas will be fair game.

I have no animosity towards the Colgan guys, I would rather give them and their newly elected MEC the benefit of the doubt as they embark in negotiating a better contract. We picked up the slack as CHQ left, and there's a chance we'll eventually replace someone in the United system, and the paint shuffle continues. What I would rather see more than any one regional getting more flying is mainline getting the flying back.

Let's just see what happens.

I'm at Colgan.....and I agree w/ this 1000%. In fact, whenever the topic of more Q's comes around; the first thing I mention is I would give up every new Q for the prospect of more mainline jobs.

More Q's = bad career opportunities.

Too Tall 08-24-2009 06:22 AM


Originally Posted by goaround2000 (Post 667285)
Actually, this statement is only partially true. The reason why XJT passed on it is because we didn't have the infrastructure to support a prop operation anymore, and launching it for what was at the time 15 frames (the original offer with no options), would not have been cost effective for XJT. Rumor has it (take it with a grain of salt) that our mgt. asked CAL to share the cost of launching the venture, and they decided it was more cost effective for them to just give the contract to Colgan. Either way, I don't think anyone is bitter, with a few exceptions who tend to be very vocal here.

There is a mission for both the Q and the ERJ (particularly for the XR), so I'm sure we'll be able to retain a good portion of our market share, and Colgan will get a few more markets. Most of us here at XJT, realize that the future of the company lies with expansion elsewhere anyways (possibly UA).

Good post. It gets older hearing the same XJT guys blaming Colgan pilots for everything that has happened there (furlough, pay cuts), but I wish XJT all the best and hope they can secure some new flying to bring all those on the streets back.

Milk Man 08-24-2009 06:29 AM

I hope OKC! OH and I wonder how many FURLOUGHED XJET guys are gonna throw their resume towards Colgan when we start hiring for these Qs??

brewpilot 08-24-2009 08:16 AM


Originally Posted by Cruise (Post 667384)
I'm at Colgan.....and I agree w/ this 1000%. In fact, whenever the topic of more Q's comes around; the first thing I mention is I would give up every new Q for the prospect of more mainline jobs.

More Q's = bad career opportunities.

Also agreed!!

cybourg10 08-24-2009 08:40 AM


Originally Posted by Milk Man (Post 667415)
I hope OKC! OH and I wonder how many FURLOUGHED XJET guys are gonna throw their resume towards Colgan when we start hiring for these Qs??

Hopefully they will be on their way back to XJT with higher pay for a smaller airplane. Just because some pilot apply does not justify the pay rates and horrible contract, although that is exactly what management will tell you.

captain152 08-24-2009 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by Milk Man (Post 667415)
I hope OKC! OH and I wonder how many FURLOUGHED XJET guys are gonna throw their resume towards Colgan when we start hiring for these Qs??

I don't think it will matter a whole lot. With our last new hire class we have about 2000 applicants for 10 positions ... 5 of which went to former Colgan pilots who came back. Just imagine how many applicants we will get when we're trying to hire 185 pilots next year for 16 more Q's (yes, 16, we're replacing the one we lost)

The Juice 08-24-2009 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by captain152 (Post 667517)
I don't think it will matter a whole lot. With our last new hire class we have about 2000 applicants for 10 positions ... 5 of which went to former Colgan pilots who came back. Just imagine how many applicants we will get when we're trying to hire 185 pilots next year for 16 more Q's (yes, 16, we're replacing the one we lost)



PNCL said in the conf call last month that they have not decided on the 16th plane yet and have not put an order in for it.

captain152 08-24-2009 06:18 PM


Originally Posted by The Juice (Post 667588)
[/B]

PNCL said in the conf call last month that they have not decided on the 16th plane yet and have not put an order in for it.

Fine!!! be that way ... like I said, we don't know anything in IAD ... all we hear are rumors. And as reliable as those are ... :rolleyes:

The Juice 08-25-2009 12:17 PM


Originally Posted by captain152 (Post 667751)
Fine!!! be that way ... like I said, we don't know anything in IAD ... all we hear are rumors. And as reliable as those are ... :rolleyes:

Is IAD a bubble that does not allow access to company/corp conference calls? Just wondering because it always amazes me how people would rather speculate and spread rumors and not take 30 minutes to listen to a conference call or read a PNCL Corp quarterly report. Most answers will be found in one of these places.

Remember, reading is fundamemtal;)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands