Republic First Officer's E190 Pay
09-26-2009, 05:14 AM
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 361
I think people forget that Midwest and Frontier were going to liquidate anyways. RAH was fortunate to see what was happening now they just added certificates that will allow them to do anything. The fact that Frontier pilots chose RAH instead of Southwest says a whole lot about their desperation. But Midwest seemed like they didn't have any say maybe that's why they are so angry. I'm pretty sure they'll get preferential hiring at RAH eventually, if they want it. Oh well.
I guess our careers are an "Oh well" to these people. Nice to know.
09-26-2009, 05:44 AM
#92
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
I think people forget that Midwest andFrontier were going to liquidate anyways. RAH was fortunate to see what was happening now they just added certificates that will allow them to do anything. The fact that Frontier pilots chose RAH instead of Southwest says a whole lot about their desperation. But Midwest seemed like they didn't have any say maybe that's why they are so angry. I'm pretty sure they'll get preferential hiring at RAH eventually, if they want it. Oh well.
09-26-2009, 06:27 AM
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
I can't believe the numbers posted looks like 50 seat pay to me. I wish you guys get a clue. Race to the bottom is right.
09-26-2009, 06:33 AM
#94
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
8 44
7 43
6 41
5 40
4 39
3 37
2 34
1 23
8 years FO pay at express FOR A 50 SEAT JET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
7 43
6 41
5 40
4 39
3 37
2 34
1 23
8 years FO pay at express FOR A 50 SEAT JET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
09-26-2009, 06:34 AM
#95
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
I think people forget that Midwest and Frontier were going to liquidate anyways. RAH was fortunate to see what was happening now they just added certificates that will allow them to do anything. The fact that Frontier pilots chose RAH instead of Southwest says a whole lot about their desperation. But Midwest seemed like they didn't have any say maybe that's why they are so angry. I'm pretty sure they'll get preferential hiring at RAH eventually, if they want it. Oh well.
This is not true.
Midwest stopped flying MD80 that were fully paid off. Why?
Midwest stopped flying B717 that had lower monthly leases than the E170. Why?
BB and TPG have said Midwest is making money in 2009. TPG found a partner in Republic to grow a 100 seat airline with E190... cheaper crew costs. Delta wants a low cost 100 seat airline to feed Delta and compete with AirTran.
09-26-2009, 08:54 AM
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: e190
Posts: 929
Heres a fact: YOU ARE FLYING A MAINLINE SIZED AIRPLANE FOR A LIVING. 100 seats or 99 seats in your case should not be flown for those pay rates EVER.... not in the interim between contracts, not because you like the airplane or even because you like the company. Your company blatantly whipshawed a pilot group and put them on the street so you guys could come in and make 40 grand a year while they were making 80+ for similar sized equipment.... How is this good for anyone?
09-26-2009, 09:14 AM
#97
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
wake the hell up! he wasnt flying a dc-9 replacement around for this contract. What is the point of this LOA? Was it to give a very small minority of pilots a few more dollars??? you did this LOA for the benefit of so few and have lost so much bargaining power in the process. Teamsters has failed your pilot group on this one.
Heres a fact: YOU ARE FLYING A MAINLINE SIZED AIRPLANE FOR A LIVING. 100 seats or 99 seats in your case should not be flown for those pay rates EVER.... not in the interim between contracts, not because you like the airplane or even because you like the company. Your company blatantly whipshawed a pilot group and put them on the street so you guys could come in and make 40 grand a year while they were making 80+ for similar sized equipment.... How is this good for anyone?
Heres a fact: YOU ARE FLYING A MAINLINE SIZED AIRPLANE FOR A LIVING. 100 seats or 99 seats in your case should not be flown for those pay rates EVER.... not in the interim between contracts, not because you like the airplane or even because you like the company. Your company blatantly whipshawed a pilot group and put them on the street so you guys could come in and make 40 grand a year while they were making 80+ for similar sized equipment.... How is this good for anyone?
It's good for the 300+ pilots at Republic (CHQ 50 seat equipment) who were going to be furloughed. Republic pilots have undermined Midwest pilot negotiations, delay integration talks and undermined the future of our profession to keep a $27,000 per year job. Then, with the profession watching, the EXCO offers a ridiculous LOA for industry low E190 first officer pay.
And they don't want to be called scabs.
Do not hire Republic Pilots
09-26-2009, 09:57 AM
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
ALPA droping the ball time after time.
09-26-2009, 10:06 AM
#99
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 574
LOL LOL LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jet blue 190 FO pay at 8years 90.00 and Capt pay 8years 134.00. If it was funny RAH pilots would be the laughing stock of the airline industry. Silly cats don't even get half of the JB boys. RAH has millions on hand to buy airlines and they tell you thats all we can afford to pay you. HA. The new MESA.
09-26-2009, 10:43 AM
#100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
So how far are you guys from a new contract and what are you doing to speed that up?
Who came up with these rates?
Who came up with these rates?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
