Why was pay cut after 9/11?
#7
#8
so did flying just never rebound?
I dont but the whole supply vs demand, as I said before I realize just after the towers nobody flying but 6months later I will go out on a limb and say it was back to normal.
It seems to me they just used it as an excuse.
am I right or wrong?
I dont but the whole supply vs demand, as I said before I realize just after the towers nobody flying but 6months later I will go out on a limb and say it was back to normal.
It seems to me they just used it as an excuse.
am I right or wrong?
#9
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 12
From: Maddog FO
Two routes:
Threaten bankruptcy: Put the fear into the pilots and make them give up pay/work rules to "avoid bankruptcy"
Go into Bankruptcy: Rip up contracts, threaten pilots with a loss of pension, furloughs, liquidation, etc.
Threaten bankruptcy: Put the fear into the pilots and make them give up pay/work rules to "avoid bankruptcy"
Go into Bankruptcy: Rip up contracts, threaten pilots with a loss of pension, furloughs, liquidation, etc.
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
so did flying just never rebound?
I dont but the whole supply vs demand, as I said before I realize just after the towers nobody flying but 6months later I will go out on a limb and say it was back to normal.
It seems to me they just used it as an excuse.
am I right or wrong?
I dont but the whole supply vs demand, as I said before I realize just after the towers nobody flying but 6months later I will go out on a limb and say it was back to normal.
It seems to me they just used it as an excuse.
am I right or wrong?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



