Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
ATC #1 high paying job least schooling >

ATC #1 high paying job least schooling

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ATC #1 high paying job least schooling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2009 | 05:42 PM
  #11  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

I'm pretty sure that new controllers will not have as good of a future payscale as "legacy" controllers...Tony?
Reply
Old 11-03-2009 | 07:11 PM
  #12  
gsphuntr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Reverse cowgirl
Default

They are pretty much direct hiring into facilities these days. Take the AT-SAT exam and they are pretty much placing well qualified individuals into the facility of their choosing IF there is a spot. You are given a location before you even go to OKC. I took the AT-SAT for the heck of it....We'll see..
Reply
Old 11-03-2009 | 07:52 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Student Pilot
Default

Originally Posted by USMC3197
I think it is very misleading to accuse them of less education.

10-jobs-with-high-pay-and-minimal-schooling-required: Personal Finance News from Yahoo! Finance

OJT is schooling in my opinion.
I don't think it's misleading at all. Right now the most formal education that the FAA is requiring applicants to have is a high school degree. Most high school grads in other job sectors will never see a payscale like that of an ATC, esp within only a few years on the job. Sure there are occasional success stories like dropout-self-made-millionaire types but most decent, well paying professions require a college or even more advanced degree. Even if it's not required, it's competitive to have one.

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
Times might be tough right now and i personally know a lot of people who have left the airlines to go to ATC. I thought about it myself as well but when it came down to it i thought to myself how i would feel in 10 years when i was clearing one of my friends to take off in a 777 and saying that could have been me, and thats how i made my choice. The money is good and yeah, you get to be home every day. But you work some wierd shifts and if you have flying in your blood, it may not be for you.
Same here.. I actually had an offer letter in my hand but when it came down to it I just couldnt see myself being happy doing that. I thought of myself in the future sitting up in the tower looking around at the planes and I knew that I would be wishing that I were in a plane instead. The salary and pension were incredibly tempting.. I wondered if I earned enough money to never worry about bills again and also have pension, could that security and peace of mind be enough to compensate for doing a job I don't enjoy... that was such a tough call but for me ultimately the answer was no.
Reply
Old 11-03-2009 | 08:03 PM
  #14  
NaviNut's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: C152 Left Seat
Default

I'd rather be in the cockpit making half that amount
Reply
Old 11-03-2009 | 08:11 PM
  #15  
gsphuntr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Reverse cowgirl
Default

who ever said controllers can't fly? I know a handful that fly contract corporate, instruct, one owns his own J3....Stick around with hopes of flying a 777 someday? seriously? RJ, 73, 777...it's all the same job guys...Is your ego that important you have to fly a 777 someday? your willing to starve to get there? Hope you look back in the end and say it was worth it...5 years in and three airframes later...a wife, a baby, no benies, no pension...I'm out! You can have my #!
Reply
Old 11-03-2009 | 09:07 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
When I attended the ATC academy in Oklahoma City in 1988, they told you to look to each side... one of those guys won't be here at the end of 3 months.

With a 50% washout rate, and it didn't matter if you had a degree, or not, or had military ATC, or not (we had two Air Force ATC guys in my class... one made it, and went to Bay Approach, and the other washed out).

For entertainment, I composed a spreadsheet (ok, this is mega nerdy) of all my classmates, and any identifiable "features" that might provide a trend towards whether we would pass or fail. Important stuff, like smoking or not, beer or wine drinker, etc. No trends could be indentified when the final verdict came out.

Those of us in the top portion of our class (lucky me) had to go to a center. I didn't even really know what a center was. I had a private pilot certificate, and had never talked to a center. I wanted Orange County tower in SoCal. I got Oakland Center (ZOA) in lovely Fremont, after briefly considering ZLA in even less lovely Palmdale.

A few that scored very close to passing were offered Flight Service jobs. Five of us went to Fremont, and even though it had a 40% failure rate, only one failed the 3-4 year checkouts to become journeyman enroute radar controllers. The agency gave the one failure from our group a Flight Data position (mostly putting in international flight plans in the center).

One of my classmates went to ZFW, and I went on to SCT in San Diego, both after about 10 years at ZOA.
The screening process before the class was hired was also not easy. So 50% still washed out.
Reply
Old 11-03-2009 | 09:39 PM
  #17  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by schone
So at the end of your term in Oak city you don't get to choose whether or not you go to an airport or a center?

The faa choses for you?

How is the determination made?

In 1988, no, I didn't get to chose. I think now that they are assigned a specific facility before being hired.

As I stated above, the determination was based on our academy scores as to what facility type (enroute center, terminal, or flight service) you would be assigned. You could haggle a little bit within the region that you were hired into, which is why I could have gotten ZLA or ZOA.

Also, the academy is no longer a screening process, but training. Almost nobody washes out at the academy, therefore folks who would have been kicked to the street 20 years ago are now just sent on their agreed upon facility.

Historically, if you washed out at the academy, you were fired. If you washed out at a center, you were sent to a tower. If you wash out of a tower, you were sent to Flight Service. And if you washed out of FSS; probably the end of the road.


If you go to an airport, does everyone start at flight data/clnc delivery on their journey to become departure/approach controllers?

Most towers do not have a combined approach control (so-called "up/downs"), so I'll say that in general, no. You will start at clearance / flight data / ground control first, however.

Last edited by TonyWilliams; 11-03-2009 at 09:54 PM.
Reply
Old 11-03-2009 | 09:53 PM
  #18  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I'm pretty sure that new controllers will not have as good of a future payscale as "legacy" controllers...Tony?

Au contraire !!! Our union, NATCA, was able to turn that around. As of October 1, 2009, controllers are once again enjoying "legacy" benefits, and the "B scale" controllers will be ramped up in pay over several years.

I don't know if a new hire today will make what I did on my last day on their last day, but it should be similar. My contemporaries at ZOA have a base pay of about $170,000 now, and should have the highest base pay in the country due to the highest government locality pay.

But, as I warned; the past four years saw FSS contracted out, and guys with days to go to retirement were kicked to the street. Absolutely sickening. Then, the agency unilaterally imposed their own pay and work rules until this recent change. This change would not have happened without intervention from the president of the US.

So, like the airlines, bad stuff can happen at no fault of your own.

At ZOA, we had several airline guys (regional airlines were still just "commuters" then ;-) One, whose dad was seniority number 1 at TWA for a long time (John Maris), was hired after being furloughed right out of TWA new hire class (I think an FE in the B707?). He retired over ten years ago, after 25 years at ZOA. I'm sure he'd think it was a good plan.

We had another who was recalled by PanAm after 15 years at FAA. We went to the class, but came back to ATC. I don't think he completed ground school. That was about 1990 !!!! He also retired.

By the way, you don't have to "make a career out of it". If you're furloughed, go for it. When hiring turns around, start throwing out the apps. If you fail at ATC, there's no PRIA !!!!!

Last edited by TonyWilliams; 11-03-2009 at 10:05 PM.
Reply
Old 11-03-2009 | 10:01 PM
  #19  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
The screening process before the class was hired was also not easy. So 50% still washed out.

Ya, I almost forgot about the test you had to take to get the interview. I scored 90-ish something I think. It took about one year from application in summer 1987 until I was hired on in the fall of 1988.

They offered a September class, but I'd just bought a house literally days before, so I deferred until the Oct 5 class. I didn't know how important that could be for seniority then !!!
Reply
Old 11-04-2009 | 05:15 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: Heavies
Default

How long after getting a well qualified do people usually hear back?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMCFLYR
Leaving the Career
2
10-10-2009 09:31 AM
Weasel
Corporate
30
04-29-2009 12:35 PM
USMCFLYR
Leaving the Career
0
04-15-2009 04:44 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
2
12-02-2008 03:39 PM
vagabond
Hiring News
1
09-15-2008 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices