Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   putting life on hold (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/4622-putting-life-hold.html)

Freightpuppy 06-28-2006 09:13 AM


Originally Posted by fosters

Obviously as a doctor, you make $500k/yr starting from day one, so it's hard to compare the two, but my brain just couldn't handle medical school. props to those that make it

I really don't think every doctor makes $500K from day one. I know ER docs don't. Jetproppilot care to comment?

Brav989 06-28-2006 09:18 AM


Originally Posted by Freightpuppy
I really don't think every doctor makes $500K from day one. I know ER docs don't. Jetproppilot care to comment?

lol 500k a year. way too high of an estimate. My uncle was offered a position as a GP for some town in new mexico and was offered 'only' 450,000'. Which is quite a bit.

But no the median national salary for a general doctor is around $140k-$160k

rickair7777 06-28-2006 09:55 AM


Originally Posted by Brav989
lol 500k a year. way too high of an estimate. My uncle was offered a position as a GP for some town in new mexico and was offered 'only' 450,000'. Which is quite a bit.

But no the median national salary for a general doctor is around $140k-$160k


Certain specialists in their own practice can make $300-400k+. Most doctors who are employed by someone else are in the $80-150K range.

I seriously doubt a GP could make $450K with his own practice , unless he employs other physicians or PA's at which point he becomes a businessman and you have to consider his earnings as business, not personal income. And like all business owners he takes certain risks, mainly liaibility related.

2dotslow 06-28-2006 10:26 AM


Originally Posted by fosters
That's the way it works in corporate. Airlines have a much different system called "senority" to prevent ass kissers and brown nosers from screwing over others.

By the same token, "seniority" perpetuates the continued advancement of folks that, except for the grace of said system, you wouldn't want to ride in the hotel van with, much less fly a line trip. Haven't seen this yet? You will...


Youre in the left seat of an American MD 80. Ten years.

Why doesnt United wanna hire you doing the same thing, for the same pay?
No such animal, besides UAL doesn't have any MD-80s. But I digress, the aforementioned seniority system is contractually guaranteed. One may be a 15 year Delta captain, but if he went, say to UPS, he'd be listed behind every single pilot hired prior to his date...regardless of their relative experience. Then the bidding...and the fun...begins.

SkyHigh 06-28-2006 08:24 PM

Much Better
 

Originally Posted by fosters
That's the way it works in corporate. Airlines have a much different system called "senority" to prevent ass kissers and brown nosers from screwing over others.

Not only that, but personally I prefer to make a little bit of money now to make more money down the line. Would you rather be making $250k for say years 12 thru 30 or $125k for years 1-30?

Obviously as a doctor, you make $500k/yr starting from day one, so it's hard to compare the two, but my brain just couldn't handle medical school. props to those that make it


It would be a better decision to make 125K for 20 years than 250K for ten. Financial empires are built over time. Real estate takes time to appreciate and so do 401K's. It would be much better to receive a modest pay check over a longer period of time. In addition the taxes become crippling at the higher salaries and would take most of your earnings anyway.

SkyHigh

SkyHawg 06-28-2006 10:45 PM

You people are considerable mistaken if you think being a doctor is that glamerous. The insurance and HMO's have made being a doctor hell. Insurance and paperwork alone are enough to slit your throat over. The way universities are spitting doctors these days are causing saturation and that is why doctors are going back to school for specializing. These are the doctors making more money.

The health care industry will go through the same issues all industries go through. Canadian doctors are trying to flood into the US because the Canadian is system is screwed. This is what happens when governments try universal healthcare. The medicare system ns the US is bad enough.

fosters 06-29-2006 05:48 AM


Originally Posted by SkyHigh
It would be a better decision to make 125K for 20 years than 250K for ten. Financial empires are built over time. Real estate takes time to appreciate and so do 401K's. It would be much better to receive a modest pay check over a longer period of time. In addition the taxes become crippling at the higher salaries and would take most of your earnings anyway.

SkyHigh

I agree, having less of a paycheck (but enough to live off of) is better than maxing out like in your example over time.

In reality, you don't make your money by earning more, you make (and save) by spending less than you make. It just means one must live below their means or do things to bring in additional income. As an example, as a first year FO I have managed to sock away $5800 (pre and post tax) in the last 10 months towards retirement alone.

In regards to the income taxes, someone going from $125k to $250k in earnings would pay approximately 5% more tax on about $70,000 in income jumping into the next tax bracket, hardly "crippling" IMO. I personally would rather pay the additional tax and make $250k vs. $125k but that is just me. Federal income taxes are capped at 35%, and one could argue that 35% isn't "most" of our earnings.

SkyHigh 06-29-2006 07:10 AM

Yes
 

Originally Posted by fosters
I agree, having less of a paycheck (but enough to live off of) is better than maxing out like in your example over time.

In reality, you don't make your money by earning more, you make (and save) by spending less than you make. It just means one must live below their means or do things to bring in additional income. As an example, as a first year FO I have managed to sock away $5800 (pre and post tax) in the last 10 months towards retirement alone.

In regards to the income taxes, someone going from $125k to $250k in earnings would pay approximately 5% more tax on about $70,000 in income jumping into the next tax bracket, hardly "crippling" IMO. I personally would rather pay the additional tax and make $250k vs. $125k but that is just me. Federal income taxes are capped at 35%, and one could argue that 35% isn't "most" of our earnings.


Yes Fosters, I agree with your assessment. My next question is: Is it better to earn 50K starting at 20 years old and slowly raise at 5% per year over the next 40 to 45 years or to pursue a typical civilian flying career?

Example: 5 years in college then 3 years as a CFI to be followed by 5 years as an FO at a regional before reaching 50K. 80 to 180 thousand in education and training costs. Eventually reaching 100 thousand at the 20 year mark? Versus no college, trade school as a truck driver, heavy equipment driver or welder. 6 months in school and 10 to 20 thousand in training costs.

SkyHigh

Freightpuppy 06-29-2006 09:49 AM


Originally Posted by SkyHigh
Yes Fosters, I agree with your assessment. My next question is: Is it better to earn 50K starting at 20 years old and slowly raise at 5% per year over the next 40 to 45 years or to pursue a typical civilian flying career?

Example: 5 years in college then 3 years as a CFI to be followed by 5 years as an FO at a regional before reaching 50K. 80 to 180 thousand in education and training costs. Eventually reaching 100 thousand at the 20 year mark? Versus no college, trade school as a truck driver, heavy equipment driver or welder. 6 months in school and 10 to 20 thousand in training costs.

SkyHigh

Hmmmmm, 9-5 working like a dog or the airline career??????

I'll roll the dice with the airline career.

P.S. I have a friend that got furloughed and went to work as a truck driver. Guess what????? Yep, trying to get back into flying. He says it's hard work. I believe it.

fosters 06-29-2006 10:49 AM


Originally Posted by SkyHigh
Yes Fosters, I agree with your assessment. My next question is: Is it better to earn 50K starting at 20 years old and slowly raise at 5% per year over the next 40 to 45 years or to pursue a typical civilian flying career?

Example: 5 years in college then 3 years as a CFI to be followed by 5 years as an FO at a regional before reaching 50K. 80 to 180 thousand in education and training costs. Eventually reaching 100 thousand at the 20 year mark? Versus no college, trade school as a truck driver, heavy equipment driver or welder. 6 months in school and 10 to 20 thousand in training costs.

SkyHigh

I would still pick being a pilot, because I know when I worked "typical" jobs back in high school I know how much those suck to work. I spent around $35k or so in actual ratings, so I don't consider that excessive. For those that are spending $100k+ on college and ratings they either didn't want to look for another way or were lazy in training and spent more than they had to.

I disagree with your yearly outlook as well. I did college and flight training in less than 3 years, CFI'd longer than most at 2, and ended up at a regional. Hopefully this one hangs around for awhile. I would at least hope until I upgrade to captain and then some. Like I mentioned in an earlier thread this is a means to an end which allows for more time off than a 'normal' job (albeit while making less, but also working less).


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:34 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands