Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Best regional to work for >

Best regional to work for

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Best regional to work for

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2006, 04:46 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
QCappy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 260
Default

Originally Posted by QXrjdriver
I think Horizon will only have a net increase of 4 maybe 5 aircraft after they take delivery of the 12 new mega-whackers. The plans are to retire 9 of the baby dash's sometime next year.
Common now, were getting 13! They just exercised one option! That's a lot more than the 12 you stated. Let the upgrades roll
QCappy is offline  
Old 07-11-2006, 07:11 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 401
Default

Originally Posted by DjHubberts
It might be a tight race as to who is the worst to fly for, GoJets or Mesa
I have no first hand knowlege of GoJet, but Mesa has the history. Not even close.
Pilot41 is offline  
Old 07-12-2006, 04:25 AM
  #13  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot41
I have no first hand knowlege of GoJet, but Mesa has the history. Not even close.
GoJet was formed as an alter-ego of Trans States Airlines. TSA is furloughing pilots and parking airplanes while GoJet is hiring and gaining airplanes, flying many of the same United routes TSA used to fly.

People can bash Mesa all you want, but Mesa took their crappy contract to scope alter-ego Freedom. Freedom A listers are just as bad as GayJet pilots.

You are right, the comparison is not even close - GoJet is much worse.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 07-12-2006, 06:50 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 401
Default

As I understand (I have never worked for either, and have no plans to due so anytime in the future) it TSA pilot had the opportunity to avoid all of this. As I understand it TSA rejected the opportunity to have one seniority list for both carriers. It would have resulted in a 3 year contract extension, not good but maybe better than what you have now. The real problem as I see it, and this is from an outsider looking in, is that TSA pilots were negotiating from a point of weakness. The reality is in the current economic environment one needs to pick their battles, the facts are with thousands of pilots on the street pilot groups have very little negotiating power. It seems to me that there was zero hope of stopping GoJet from coming into being, TSA pilots had little power to do anything about it, and so what was the ultimate goal? My personal opinion is TSA guys are getting screwed; however they should have realized they were dealing from a position of weakness not strength. Again this is a prospective of someone on the outside looking in, which is always different from being on the inside. I do know from personal experience that ALPA has a history of handing out bad advice to its membership. I hope TSA flight crews ultimately get this resolved, they deserve a lot better than they have gotten over the years.
Pilot41 is offline  
Old 07-12-2006, 07:20 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: EMB170 FO
Posts: 168
Default

TSA guys could have been more proactive and resolved this a year ago. Now it snowballed because of their tenacity
C175 is offline  
Old 07-12-2006, 07:26 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
G-Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 737
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot41
As I understand (I have never worked for either, and have no plans to due so anytime in the future) it TSA pilot had the opportunity to avoid all of this. As I understand it TSA rejected the opportunity to have one seniority list for both carriers. It would have resulted in a 3 year contract extension, not good but maybe better than what you have now. The real problem as I see it, and this is from an outsider looking in, is that TSA pilots were negotiating from a point of weakness. The reality is in the current economic environment one needs to pick their battles, the facts are with thousands of pilots on the street pilot groups have very little negotiating power. It seems to me that there was zero hope of stopping GoJet from coming into being, TSA pilots had little power to do anything about it, and so what was the ultimate goal?
Pilot41 may have said it best. TSA guys may have never had a chance. Looking from the outside does make appear that way. I have also heard that the TSA guys had their chance to take Go Jet.

Sometimes you have to take the lesser of two evils. Really, who is the lesser of two evils?
G-Dog is offline  
Old 07-12-2006, 07:59 AM
  #17  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

Originally Posted by C175
TSA guys could have been more proactive and resolved this a year ago. Now it snowballed because of their tenacity
What? Do you even know what you are talking about?

TSA pilots stood firm and rejected a crappy contract extention that would have made their already poor contract even worse, allowing furlough by fleet not seniority, providing furlough protection to the GoJet pilots already on property while allowing the company to furlough J-41 crews as their planes are parked.

How would you have felt if Heller had integrated all the S5 Saab guys at their DOH? You'd probably be pretty ****ed off, and your union did the right thing. To fault TSA pilots for declining an industry-worst contract is foolish at best.

TSA pilots never had a fair shot at securing this flying, despite what any GoJet pilot or TSA manager might say.
BoilerUP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tomo
Major
11
02-27-2007 01:20 PM
starvinteacher
Regional
10
04-13-2006 08:16 PM
cl65
Major
1
03-02-2006 09:14 PM
pilotrod
Regional
28
02-01-2006 03:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices