Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
ATPs required for FOs... Senate next week. >

ATPs required for FOs... Senate next week.

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ATPs required for FOs... Senate next week.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2010 | 05:49 PM
  #111  
resetjet's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by Aloha
Whacker,
I understand that you are making this argument from an economic standpoint, and although I would like to see RJ pay to go up as well, it is not a necessity in my view. The argument I am making is that we as an industry, need to have a minimum acceptable level of experience to operate a comercial airliner as an airline transport pilot. One needs to hold an Airline Transport Pilot rating to meet that acceptable level of experience in our cockpits. IF pay happens to go up, or down, because of this implementation, so be it.
-Aloha
Couldn't agree more
Reply
Old 03-08-2010 | 05:58 PM
  #112  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: The Beginnings
Default

Originally Posted by nwa757
Going into the Senate next week.

Vote [for] here:
WashingtonWatch.com - S. 1744, The Enhancing Flight Crewmembers' Training
Your vote makes a difference.... and write your Senators!



S. 1744: Enhancing Flight Crewmembers' Training (GovTrack.us)


Before a speaking engagement at the Heathcare Information and Management Systems Society Conference at the Georgia World Congress Center Thursday, Sullenberger endorsed legislation that would encourage regional airlines to hire more experienced pilots. That legislation is scheduled to be introduced as Senate Bill 1744 sometime next week, he said. 'Sully' Calls for Increased Airline Safety - 11Alive.com | WXIA | Atlanta, GA
Excellent post, excellent link. Thanks for not pushing either "side" or an agenda with your entry post.

I'll be writing my senator with my thoughts on the matter.
Reply
Old 03-09-2010 | 06:35 AM
  #113  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,870
Likes: 668
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

I noticed 25% voted against...the puppy mills and air universities must have turned out their student bodies en masse.
Reply
Old 03-09-2010 | 06:51 AM
  #114  
NightIP's Avatar
Tuk er jerbs!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: B747 Left
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I noticed 25% voted against...the puppy mills and air universities must have turned out their student bodies en masse.
If you're on facebook, go check out some of these "Against HR3371" groups. They're filled with current ERAU/UND/Purdue/etc. students who can't see the forest for the trees. They just want to be able to go fly jets as soon as possible; making a living doing it hasn't yet crossed their minds.
Reply
Old 03-09-2010 | 11:22 AM
  #115  
wags3539's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Gear Slinger
Default

Originally Posted by NightIP
If you're on facebook, go check out some of these "Against HR3371" groups. They're filled with current ERAU/UND/Purdue/etc. students who can't see the forest for the trees. They just want to be able to go fly jets as soon as possible; making a living doing it hasn't yet crossed their minds.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but can you really blame them. They were around to see some of their peers get into the industry at very low time, and this is going to prevent them from doing the same. I know if I was still back in school, I would be voting against it as well. Maybe more emphasis should be placed on the interview process, and the sim ride to weed out those who shouldn't be in the cockpit. If you can make it through a tough interview, and make it through ground school/IOE, why shouldn't they be allowed in. To flat out say 1500 hours is going to make you a better pilot, well, I can see why the up and coming generation of pilots would be frustrated with that.
Reply
Old 03-09-2010 | 11:25 AM
  #116  
wags3539's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Gear Slinger
Default

Just wanted to play devil's advocate, so before I get blasted, I do agree things need to change and standards need to be increased. I also think quality of flight time should be looked at, and more regulation on the training departments of airlines, since they need to share the blame if somebody makes it to the line who shouldn't be there.
Reply
Old 03-09-2010 | 12:03 PM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NightIP
If you're on facebook, go check out some of these "Against HR3371" groups. They're filled with current ERAU/UND/Purdue/etc. students who can't see the forest for the trees. They just want to be able to go fly jets as soon as possible; making a living doing it hasn't yet crossed their minds.
For those interested in seeing the group....it is called "Pilots Against the the First Officer ATP Requirement".....and yes, there are 2 "the"...sad I know
Reply
Old 03-09-2010 | 12:03 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Default

Anyone know what day are they voting on this?
Reply
Old 03-09-2010 | 12:17 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JPilot23
Anyone know what day are they voting on this?
Not this week like the title of this thread says. Right now it has been referred to committee. It still needs to get reported by committee before it can be voted on in the Senate and then the House.

S. 1744: Enhancing Flight Crewmembers' Training (GovTrack.us)
Reply
Old 03-09-2010 | 12:30 PM
  #120  
el jefe's Avatar
Tier 3 Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Canadair Gosh
Default

In the near future there will be a shortage of EXPERIENCED pilots.

If someone hasn't said that already...
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices