Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

RAH 100 seat pay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2010 | 07:20 AM
  #11  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It's not that simple. Some airline's (ex DAL) have scope which specifies that a regional subcontractor who flies for them may not operate airplanes larger than X for anyone or any reason, including other majors or as a branded airline.
? Not too sure about this one. Depends on who you ask. There are some on the MEC who say that this is not the case, and some who say it is. Looks like an arbitration is in order here.
Reply
Old 03-23-2010 | 07:31 AM
  #12  
JustAMushroom's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

Originally Posted by HawkerJet
True, RAH is operating the 190's as Midwest which they own, but how long till they do show up in United colors? A regional is flying a 100 seat aircraft, it will spread. Scope.

Pay is only part of the much larger issue looming for this industry.
Goodness.. I was simply saying this issue of 100 seat pay for Midwest/Frontier has nothing to do with scope because they're on a different certificate.

I don't see this 100 seat regional feed spreading to UA,AA,DA or any other large carrier because it would be like slitting your own throat (a topic which has been beaten to death).

WHEN SkyWest,XJet and the rest buy 100 seat planes to "codeshare" (which is different than regional feed) for UA or AA, etc.. this Republic deal will be the benchmark for those pilots wages.

Last edited by JustAMushroom; 03-23-2010 at 07:33 AM. Reason: Spelling, yet again!
Reply
Old 03-23-2010 | 08:04 AM
  #13  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sizzlechest
were you part of the negotiating EXCO in 2003 when the contract was ratified? No?..... that's what I thought. Don't claim to know what happened or the "why"s of what was negotiated.
Feel free to offer a better reason.
Reply
Old 03-23-2010 | 08:13 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
Things working against us:
Brian Bedford
Reply
Old 03-23-2010 | 08:39 AM
  #15  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 41
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
The company refused to negotiate new pay, and has removed the seatbelt from one seat, claiming that the 100th seat was deactivated, and therefore there is no reason to create a new pay scale.
Wow, they didnt even have the decency to physically remove the 100th seat. Pathetic. I am guessing BB knows he will lose this one in arbitration. Im also guessing things will drag on and on years in arbitration until that 100th seatbelt gets put back, so it will make $$ for BB until then.
Reply
Old 03-23-2010 | 08:44 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

other things going against you are plenty of industry arbitrations, mostly by FA's, and industry common practices of removing from service a few seats to get under FAA limits and then need fewer fight attendants...

IE - taking a few seats out of service to get a 155 seat jet to only 149 seats and then needing one less FA... althoigh they typically remove the seat, not just MEL it.... how do you have a permanent MEL? do they fix it, then put it back out oif service on some type of schedule?
Reply
Old 03-24-2010 | 10:59 AM
  #17  
banja12's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default


Do you think they removed seats?
Reply
Old 03-24-2010 | 11:51 AM
  #18  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
how do you have a permanent MEL? do they fix it, then put it back out oif service on some type of schedule?
The CRJ seatbelts are not deferrable, but the passenger seat is. The seat is repair category C, which means the MEL is only valid for 10 days after the deferral is made. I guess Embraer / Chautauqua have a different set of rules, or maybe their POI doesn't care.
Reply
Old 03-26-2010 | 02:24 AM
  #19  
duvie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
From: WB Bunkie
Default

Originally Posted by b82rez
Sizzlechest is right. Do not pretend to know the logic behind negotiating poverty wages for half of the pilot group.
Of all the things to jump on someone for, I thought this issue is pretty cut and dry. Is there another reason/rationalization for the FO "commuter" pay progression (or lack thereof)?
Reply
Old 03-26-2010 | 04:01 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by banja12

Do you think they removed seats?
HA!! Too funny
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
B1900YX
Regional
212
06-28-2009 08:55 AM
xjtr
Major
43
06-28-2009 06:51 AM
mjarosz
Regional
47
06-24-2009 06:33 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-14-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices