![]() |
Originally Posted by dojetdriver
(Post 802106)
Not sure about that, on a clear VFR day with the plane lit up in full disco/lights a shinein' mode, on final I'd hardly say birds are scurrying away from the path of the aircraft.
http://news.discovery.com/tech/wide-...ance-tech.html |
Originally Posted by Phrog Phlyer
(Post 802035)
That was proven in an USAF study to not work.
Illuminating the aircraft does have some effect. Anything which increases the aircraft's visibility to birds is good. Even if bugs are attracted to the light and birds like bugs, if the birds can see the bugs being chased by a 250 knot big metal bird, then they will probably get out of the way. |
Let the birds avoid you
Telling someone they should try to avoid birds is usually dangerous advice. Most of the incidents occur on takeoff or landing, with little extra airspeed available for maneuvering to avoid. There was a T-38 a number of years back that took out a large section of the perimeter fence with its gear while trying to avoid a bird. It came within a few feet of a fireball due to an avoidance reaction -- no critique on the pilot, just something to think about. The best reaction I know is to duck below the glare shield (save yourself first), then take action if the bird actually hits you.
I've lost an engine twice due to birdstrikes, once entering the pattern in formation (we always briefed to take the bird rather than to maneuver with a jet a few feet away), and another on a touch and go. Avoidance was not an option in either case. The only time I came close to hitting geese was at night. I still have visions of that V passing about 5 feet over the top of the canopy while we were at 300 knots on radar downwind. Not scary at the time, but scares the snot out of me every time I remember it. I wouldn't even have had the chance to duck. |
Bingo.. this talk of "Sully should have just turned to avoid the birds" is couch chuck yeager talk.
How on earth did a thread about a guy that moved the flaps during a takeoff roll and didn't understand why he got a config warning turn into that? Come on, people.... |
It's official: Both pilots have been canned.
|
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 802502)
It's official: Both pilots have been canned.
PSA'ers, is this true? |
[quote=The Juice;802735] Also that PSA is having captains take classes now on command authority.quote]
A class is being devleoped according to a memo sent to all crews from the VP of Flight Operations |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 802735)
I heard that PSA management is more upset about the lack of "command authority" demonstrated by the captain after the accident rather than about the actual cause of the accident? Also that PSA is having captains take classes now on command authority.
PSA'ers, is this true?
Originally Posted by FlyingNasaForm
(Post 802783)
Also that PSA is having captains take classes now on command authority.quote]
A class is being devleoped according to a memo sent to all crews from the VP of Flight Operations Not sure you can teach that stuff. You can teach what is expected, but if someone is going to freeze, I imagine that they are just as likely to freeze after having another 2 hour class as they were before. The fact is - you just don't know how one is going to react until faced with the situation without having been put in that situation during training that is so realistic that it draws out those same emotions. Now this is assuming that these Command Authority classes are in response to the company's opinion that the CA did not act accordingly after the mishap. Is there not already similar training during upgrade. Do airlines have any post-mishap training? USMCFLYR |
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
(Post 802796)
Do airlines have any post-mishap training?
USMCFLYR The course feedback program is administered by the Unemployment Office. |
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
(Post 802796)
Classes on Command Authority?
Not sure you can teach that stuff. You can teach what is expected, but if someone is going to freeze, I imagine that they are just as likely to freeze after having another 2 hour class as they were before. The fact is - you just don't know how one is going to react until faced with the situation without having been put in that situation during training that is so realistic that it draws out those same emotions. Now this is assuming that these Command Authority classes are in response to the company's opinion that the CA did not act accordingly after the mishap. Is there not already similar training during upgrade. Do airlines have any post-mishap training? USMCFLYR |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 802920)
The problem is you are thinking as a smart person, not as airline management. This reminds me of how Colgan now teaches a Threat Error Management class which is mandatory for all pilots. It is supposed to teach pilots to identify threats in behavior and situations and break the chain before it becomes something much worse. They teach the pilots this but crew schedulers are still allowed to run wild with extensions, JRM, and 9 leg days...where is the Threat Error Management in that way of thinking?
|
Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
(Post 802977)
9 leg days??? I thought 6 leg days sucked!
Pathetic |
Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
(Post 802813)
Yes, The course title is "Terminated."
The course feedback program is administered by the Unemployment Office. Training that teaches you what to do after you have a mishap. Not training after you have had a mishap ;) USMCFLYR |
@...hey it's Tom @. I'm #...um well we're going down the runway here in
uh Charleston, West Virginia, and we got a config flap config uh spoiler and I rejected and uh well long story short um past the runway I'm into that over thing you know where the airplane sinks into the— into it. uh so now I don't know what the hell I'm supposed to do cause I've never obviously had anything like this you know...yeah I'm sitting in the airplane right now...yeah pretty— yeah yeah...yeah who do I call on that? do I call chief pilot? well okay I'm gonna tell you exactly what happened. um well yeah we were— we were flaps eight okay? well uh # the data said flaps twenty...and it was at eight so as we're going down the runway I kind of noticed that so I put it to twenty and then we got config flaps probably I'm sure because they were movin'. so i just figured # okay I'll stop. you know I got config flaps config spoilers so like # you know so I tried to stop and it # went—yeah. so you know how— how am I gonna #— so cause obviously they're gonna come and look at all this # right? they're gonna be able to see it...yeah...no hold on a second. hey everybody's fine right in the back. hey is the gear—the gear hasn't collapsed or anything has it? |
Originally Posted by The Juice
(Post 802735)
I heard that PSA management is more upset about the lack of "command authority" demonstrated by the captain after the accident rather than about the actual cause of the accident? Also that PSA is having captains take classes now on command authority.
PSA'ers, is this true? |
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 802502)
It's official: Both pilots have been canned.
Sad that one incident torpedo's a career, you wonder how many office workers and other professionals have done something stupid and just moved on.... Bad choice, definately, worth getting fired? Not sure. |
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
(Post 803286)
:D You misunderstood my question.
Training that teaches you what to do after you have a mishap. Not training after you have had a mishap ;) USMCFLYR |
Originally Posted by solinator
(Post 803706)
Do you guys feel, in a comparison between ex-military vs. civilian background, that ex-military would have a stronger sense of command authority?
I feel that ex-military pilots as a whole demonstrate command authority better than civilian background pilots. Again, this is just my opinion. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands